Apache Now the Leader in SSL Servers? 160
miller60 writes "Apache has overtaken Microsoft as the leading developer of secure web servers, according to Netcraft's monthly SSL survey. Apache now runs on 44.0% of secure web sites, compared to 43.8% for Microsoft. Apache's recent gains are attributed to the inclusion of mod_ssl in version 2, and strong growth of SSL-enabled sites in non-US markets where Apache has stronger market share."
Congratulations (Score:5, Interesting)
Shows what I know (Score:5, Interesting)
Just now? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Congratulations (Score:4, Interesting)
They rejected many security patches from OpenBSD for httpd 1.3.29, and even before OpenBSD forked httpd 1.3 (the infamous license change) the in-tree diff was over 4000 lines of code.
Re:oblig troll (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Shows what I know (Score:4, Interesting)
false readings (Score:4, Interesting)
I run several ssl www-servers with linux+apache configuration, and yet they show as windows 2003 on netcraft surveys because eNom reports them that way.
The true amount of IIS-based ssl servers is much smaller.
Re:Shows what I know (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Who chooses Microsoft? (Score:2, Interesting)
As far as dynamic web-page language/technology goes, PHP runs poorly, is a bit painful to install / configure compared to the
As far as databases go, MS SQL server comes with better tools than mysql, and generally requires less knowledge to administer.
Apache might be more configurable but editing Apache configuration XML has been problematic for me the limited times I've had to do it. IIS has most of that exposed in the UI, and there are generally more "30 second how-tos" for doing that stuff with the meta-data editor if you need to.
Linux vs. Windows comes down to the fact that I prefer Linux for a server OS but IIS / MS SQL don't run on Linux.
Re:Who chooses Microsoft? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm not FOR IIS, nor am I against it. I'm just saying that it's sometimes difficult for someone/some group to make such a big switch.
Re:Just now? (Score:3, Interesting)
The stats listed might simply be reflecting this trend towards a split/more secure setup.
Re:Thought MS was further back. (Score:4, Interesting)
It's all about the developers. People use IIS because it serves ASP and more importantly ASP.net. Say what you will about Microsoft, but Visual Stuido is a first-class development environment. Building scalable and functional web applications in ASP.net using the graphical tools in VS is easier than anything I've seen in the LAMP world, with the possible exception of Rails.
Plus, Microsoft's near-suicidal devotion to backwards compatibility makes heavily mixed ASP/ASP.net sites like CDW [cdw.com] reasonably easy, probably easier than mixing different web frameworks on a LAMP or Java platform.
Re:Not really. It all depends on how you count it. (Score:3, Interesting)