prostoalex writes "Google's acquisition of online video sharing site YouTube.com resulted in massive traffic headed to uTube.com, "the number one supplier of used Tube & Pipe equipment in the world!", according to the site. CNN Money reports: "The company, which sells used machinery for making tubes to clients worldwide, has seen its site utube.com knocked off line by millions of online searchers looking for video site. "It's killing us," said Ralph Girkins, president and owner of the 22-year-old business. "All my worldwide reps use our Web site. Customers all over the world use it to bring up photos of the machinery, descriptions and specifications there."""
Ahem, I think you mean tubes. And, yes, given that the Internet is a series of tubes, it stands to reason that buying more tubes would allow you to get your Internets faster. After all, it's not just a truck that you can dump stuff on. Good grief, everyone knows that, you loser.
If all slashdot readers can AVOID the temptation to visit the utube site I'm sure the company would much appreciate it!
Opps. Why the heck did they post links in the summary if they didn't want us to visit it?
It sounds like the company should update their webhosting and look at all the miss directed youtube folks as free ads. Well, I can see where the company is coming from. My dad sells large farm equipment. Their company would never ever just stick an ad in newspaper or do TV ads. They put ads only in ind
Worth noting that the professionally edited article at CNN links to everyone concerned except utube.com. At least they engage their brains before publishing stories.
Well, actually several, but mostly it boils down to the utter lack of editorial standards. Bad grammar, bad spelling, slashvertisements, links to semi-literate amateur blogs for stories carried by decent, high-quality sites, and... sheer idiocy like this. I enjoy slashdot. It's an interesting diversion. And I've been around for a long time, and I still haven't given up on it. But the complete and utter lack of editorial common sense or professionalism is simpy infuriating at times! I would miss slashdot if it disappeared, but there's no way I'm willing to pay for something this poorly produced. And that's the bottom line.
However, at least this time I can be proud to announce that I did not RTFA!:)
The site seems to be performing fine. Maybe someone's just taking the opportunity to get their company in the news. Nothing wrong with that, of course.
You know, MLB.com had this problem a few years ago when it was owned by some law firm. Their solution is simple, have a really simple front page saying "If you are looking for the video site YOUtube, click on the link, if you are looking for used hardware, click on Utube It will save them some trouble in the short run, but my question is shouldn't this be happening all along since youtube is popular BEFORE google decided to buy it out?
The issue is that if the site gets promoted electronically, then the name/link tends to be correct. But, if the issue is promoted on TV (like it was with the google buyout), then people just hear the name "youtoob" and with the trend of naming things iThis, eThat, it's quite likely that these people think that it should be written uTube. Noone is going to make the mistake if they get the recommendation in writing - via e-mail, IM, etc - then YouTube can't be confused with uTube - but they do sound the same.
Their site is fine now. Their equipment, though...
They're a surplus machinery dealer, and much of their equipment has seen hard use followed by neglect. The neglect is worse than the hard use. This lathe [utube.com] is a good example. That's a good Monarch precision lathe, but the picture, taken in 2000, shows considerable rust. Most of their gear is like that; it looks like it came out of an abandoned factory. It's repairable; you can send the lathe back to Monarch [lucasprecision.com] for an overhaul. But it's not good for much in its current condition. If there's any rust in the bearings, the precision is lost.
For comparison, see this Monarch Lathe [ebay.com] on eBay. Made in 1950, and still in good shape. Those things will last a century if cared for.
If you have machinery like that around that's not in use, you have to oil it, then wrap it in plastic with some dessicant inside.
It is far more interesting, in a relative sense, than the three hundred posts of "haw haw, now utube.com is linked by slashdot and they will get teh slashdoted" that comprise most of the rest of the discussion.
The most frightening aspect of this is that there are tens of millions of people out there that are having a difficult time spelling out YouTube. If it were a case of mistyping, would that particular iteration really show up that much? Perhaps we have millions of kids out there who genuinely believe that you is spelled u.
So you go shopping on EBB-eh for used IP-odds? Does it confuse you when Emile sends you email?
Single-letter prefixes and intentional bizarre "mispellings" are par for the course on the Internet. There's no good way for anyone not already familiar with YouTube to umabiguously know whether it was "utube" or "youtube" if they just heard the name.
think about it- "E"bay "E"trade they hear about utube on the radio business news or finance programs, (npr for example) and type that name in, best guess
I suppose you laugh at people who think eyeTunes is spelt iTunes, right? They must be illiterate as well, right? Perhaps they really do think the body part known as the eye is spelt i.
Wherever possible, pick a name that is easily read in an email or understood when read out over radio, on the phone, or in conversation. Also, easy to remember and spell.
But almost $2b later, I can't imagine that the founders care all that much!
"All my worldwide reps use our Web site. Customers all over the world use it to bring up photos of the machinery, descriptions and specifications there."
I guess they found out the hard way that making normal business operation dependent on the availability of the website, without taking great pains to assure that availability, is asking for trouble.
This time, they got slashdotted by mistake. Next time, it could be a targeted DDoS attack.
Utube marketing guy: WTF? Our server is down! Utube hosting provider: (putting down fire extinguisher) We want more money, you're burning bandwidth like the U.S. burns fossil fuels! Utube marketing guy: Wait - I've just hear that Google bought YouTube and people are interested. Hey! This is an amazing marketing opportunity, I wonder how we can make use of it? (Pays hosting provider big wodge of cash)
(...ten minutes of googling later)
Utube marketing guy: My highly expensive and accurate research shows that tubes are incredibly important to our new potential customer base at slashdot.org, they talk about them a lot. Utube CEO: OK, so how do we get their attention? Utube marketing guy: Simple, we whine to CNN about how our business is going down the toilet thanks to google, then submit a story to slashdot - they love that stuff!
(...)
Slashdot editor: Hmm, I've been rejecting a lot of stories like this recently, and this one appears to be suitably poorly put together - perfect! Slashdot editor: (skipping "Dupe Check"/"Spel Check"/"Grahma Check" buttons) *PUBLISH* Slashdot readers: Oooh, how cruel to link to that site! (Follows link to see if servers really are down or not). Server room: (indifferent rattle of hard disks) Utube hosting provider: (puffing on expensive cigar) Suckers! Time to order my new Humvee.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
-- Albert Einstein
Insult to injury (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Insult to injury (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Insult to injury (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:Insult to injury (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Insult to injury (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Insult to injury (Score:5, Funny)
2.5 inch PVC happens to be very close to the size of a tennis ball.
Not that anyone would ever special order 2.5" PVC for use in a pneumatic air cannon.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Insult to injury (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Opps. Why the heck did they post links in the summary if they didn't want us to visit it?
It sounds like the company should update their webhosting and look at all the miss directed youtube folks as free ads. Well, I can see where the company is coming from. My dad sells large farm equipment. Their company would never ever just stick an ad in newspaper or do TV ads. They put ads only in ind
and now we /. them (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:and now we /. them (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
there's a reason I don't give slashdot my money! (Score:5, Insightful)
However, at least this time I can be proud to announce that I did not RTFA!
Parent
Re:and now we /. them (Score:5, Interesting)
Two firsts in the one day!
(Someone had to say it. But I agree they made the correct decision)
Parent
And as if that wasn't enough.. (Score:5, Funny)
Poor guys.
Tubes (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, come off it. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Next aquisition (Score:5, Funny)
Obviously, utube.com will be Google's next aquisition - just look at how much traffic they get!
Re:Next aquisition (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Put up some advertising/adsense banners (Score:5, Funny)
Or is it free publicity? (Score:2, Informative)
-b
Oh, boo hoo (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
youtube.com has been registered since 2005
i think when they first made their website that was the last thing they were thinking about.
Are they confused as Ted Stevens? (Score:3, Funny)
It's 2006 (Score:2, Funny)
Deja Vu (Score:5, Funny)
(I can hear their servers weeping in the corner right now).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, they're not weeping -- that sound you hear is the server's molten case dripping out of the rack.
Solution (Score:4, Insightful)
if you are looking for used hardware, click on Utube
It will save them some trouble in the short run, but my question is shouldn't this be happening all along since youtube is popular BEFORE google decided to buy it out?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But, if the issue is promoted on TV (like it was with the google buyout), then people just hear the name "youtoob" and with the trend of naming things iThis, eThat, it's quite likely that these people think that it should be written uTube.
Noone is going to make the mistake if they get the recommendation in writing - via e-mail, IM, etc - then YouTube can't be confused with uTube - but they do sound the same.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You would though if you owned a shirt.
Nothing to see here, it's up (Score:5, Interesting)
Their site is fine now. Their equipment, though...
They're a surplus machinery dealer, and much of their equipment has seen hard use followed by neglect. The neglect is worse than the hard use. This lathe [utube.com] is a good example. That's a good Monarch precision lathe, but the picture, taken in 2000, shows considerable rust. Most of their gear is like that; it looks like it came out of an abandoned factory. It's repairable; you can send the lathe back to Monarch [lucasprecision.com] for an overhaul. But it's not good for much in its current condition. If there's any rust in the bearings, the precision is lost.
For comparison, see this Monarch Lathe [ebay.com] on eBay. Made in 1950, and still in good shape. Those things will last a century if cared for.
If you have machinery like that around that's not in use, you have to oil it, then wrap it in plastic with some dessicant inside.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Spelling is HARD (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Spelling is HARD (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Single-letter prefixes and intentional bizarre "mispellings" are par for the course on the Internet. There's no good way for anyone not already familiar with YouTube to umabiguously know whether it was "utube" or "youtube" if they just heard the name.
They've been trained (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Spelling is HARD (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Lesson in domain names for YouTube (Score:3, Interesting)
But almost $2b later, I can't imagine that the founders care all that much!
That's not nice! (Score:4, Funny)
YAFIYGI (Score:3, Insightful)
I guess they found out the hard way that making normal business operation dependent on the availability of the website, without taking great pains to assure that availability, is asking for trouble.
This time, they got slashdotted by mistake. Next time, it could be a targeted DDoS attack.
Probably just a misguided marketing ploy anyway (Score:5, Funny)
Utube hosting provider: (putting down fire extinguisher) We want more money, you're burning bandwidth like the U.S. burns fossil fuels!
Utube marketing guy: Wait - I've just hear that Google bought YouTube and people are interested. Hey! This is an amazing marketing opportunity, I wonder how we can make use of it? (Pays hosting provider big wodge of cash)
(...ten minutes of googling later)
Utube marketing guy: My highly expensive and accurate research shows that tubes are incredibly important to our new potential customer base at slashdot.org, they talk about them a lot.
Utube CEO: OK, so how do we get their attention?
Utube marketing guy: Simple, we whine to CNN about how our business is going down the toilet thanks to google, then submit a story to slashdot - they love that stuff!
(...)
Slashdot editor: Hmm, I've been rejecting a lot of stories like this recently, and this one appears to be suitably poorly put together - perfect!
Slashdot editor: (skipping "Dupe Check"/"Spel Check"/"Grahma Check" buttons) *PUBLISH*
Slashdot readers: Oooh, how cruel to link to that site! (Follows link to see if servers really are down or not).
Server room: (indifferent rattle of hard disks)
Utube hosting provider: (puffing on expensive cigar) Suckers! Time to order my new Humvee.
Now the name makes sense (Score:4, Interesting)
Free Advertising? (Score:3, Insightful)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
I don't hear sysco complaining (cisco?) (Score:3, Insightful)
sysco - provider of food stuff to eateries
http://www.sysco.com/ [sysco.com]
cisco - provider of network equipment.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)