Steve Chen Making China's Supercomputer Grid 128
nanotrends writes "Steve Chen was the principal designer of the Cray X-MP supercomputer. He recently created multi-teraflop blade based supercomputers for a Chinese company. He is now creating a supercomputer grid across China and he is working on a bio-supercomputer extension to
human brains called THIRD-BRAIN. The THIRD-BRAIN project has significant 3 year and 5 year targets."
I certainly hope this plan is actually reasonable. (Score:5, Insightful)
One brain in your head, one in your pants (Score:3, Insightful)
Why call it Third Brain? I'm not terribly familiar with Anatomy, but I thought humans only had one brain. (Well, unless you're a guy. Then you've got an extra one in your pants that does most of the thinking)
Haha. Not funny. (Score:1, Insightful)
s/communist/capitalist/
s/Tibet/Iraq/
You cannot even talk about their dumb leaders after electing Bush.
Maybe someone comes up with moral enough to make speeches. This is not America, though.
Strange... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Difficult to take 3rd brain seriously (Score:3, Insightful)
It's pure hubris. Even if he does make some AI breakthrough (unlikely), he may find that his shiny new grid is not suited to its implementation. It may not clique well. He has a system (a grid) and is trying to apply it to a known problem (AI). It's a lofty and noble goal, but it isn't the best way to solve a problem. Usually, it's a good idea to have your algorithms and systems though out (or at least an idea of what they are) before starting implementation.
Fortunately for him though, he has a nice preexisting model that he can copy the structure of. Our brains are distributed, and are cliqued (from my understanding). So building a grid and trying to apply it to AI is not a terrible idea.
At least the Chinese will have a nice super-grid to do weapons research on in the mean time.
Re:I certainly hope this plan is actually reasonab (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, isn't that what made America so great?
Re:A Great Leap Forward in computing? (Score:3, Insightful)
This is in no small part due to government agricultural subsidies, but the fact that these subsidies continue despite the fact that they actively undermine our health has to say something about the power our government grants business.
Meanwhile, the wages of the poorest 40% of Americans have hardly budged since the 1970s, while the richest 1% of Americans now own about half the wealth in this country. Is that the sort of economy anyone would plan, or anyone would ask for? Besides the aforementioned 1%, I mean.
In a way, we have the worst sort of mix of private and public: a government which allows business to write its rules. Capitalism is no more a panacea than communism. Global capitalism isn't all prosperity and health and flat-screen TVs; it also brings wage arbitrage, huge wealth inequalities, unsustainable overconsumption, sweatshop labor, and a host of other problems. In your rush to defend the good aspects of the free market, you shouldn't ignore its pitfalls and limitations.