Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses The Internet

Google's Silent Monopoly 425

An anonymous reader writes "Isaac Garcia from Central Desktop Blog writes, 'How much does Google pay *itself* to claim the top ad position for searches relevant to its own products? Google holds the top advertisement (Adword) slot for the following key words: intranet, spreadsheet, documents, calendar, word processor, email, video, instant messenger, blog, photo sharing, online groups, maps, start page, restaurants, dining, and books... ...if you are trying to advertise a product that is competitive to Google, then you'll never be able to receive the Top Ad Position, no matter how much money you bid and spend. How different is it than MSFT placing its products (Internet Explorer) in a premium marketing position (embedded in the OS)?'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google's Silent Monopoly

Comments Filter:
  • by tronicum ( 617382 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:25PM (#17130988)
    thats an evil monopoly!
  • by __aaclcg7560 ( 824291 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:26PM (#17131008)
    Maybe you need to find a product or service that doesn't compete with Google Enterprises?
  • by Rastignac ( 1014569 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:27PM (#17131046)
    ...doesn't give "GoogleOS" as a result. Someone else has operating system monopoly, indeed.
  • by UbuntuDupe ( 970646 ) * on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:30PM (#17131090) Journal
    And when I **** my wife, I'm denying myself the revenue of a third-party john who might have rented her for that slot. Thus, in a very real sense, I pay the same rate as everyone else.
  • not true (Score:3, Funny)

    by Lehk228 ( 705449 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:32PM (#17131134) Journal
    I just tested "intranet"

    .Net Office Intranet www.intranetdashboard.com .Net CMS - Over 35 apps included. Free 30 Day Trial - Download Now !
    Intranet www.google.com/a Create a custom start page for all users on your domain. Learn more.


    google's ad comes in at #2 on this one Google Checkout
  • by lastchance_000 ( 847415 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:33PM (#17131154)
    No. Since you're married, you pay much, much more.
  • by pdabbadabba ( 720526 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:33PM (#17131172) Homepage
    That sounds ridiculous, but its true, really. Opportunity cost. Bet you didn't know that about your wife. :)
  • by maxume ( 22995 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:36PM (#17131246)
    Walmart refuses Target's request to advertise in Walmart stores.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:37PM (#17131284)
    if len("microsoft") > len("google") {
       print "STFU";
    } else {
       print "GOOG";
    }
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:43PM (#17131428)
    Strange. When I **** your wife, I don't pay anything. I think you're getting ripped off.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @12:49PM (#17131530)
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/ 061206seedmoney.htm [prisonplanet.com]

    Ex-Agent: CIA Seed Money Helped Launch Google
    Steele goes further than before in detailing ties, names Google's CIA liaison

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet
    Wednesday, December 6, 2006

    An ex-CIA agent has gone further than ever before in detailing Google's relationship with the Central Intelligence Agency, claiming sources told him that CIA seed money helped get the company off the ground and naming for the first time Google's CIA point man.

    Robert David Steele, a 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer and a former clandestine services case officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, is the CEO of OSS.net.

    Speaking to the Alex Jones Show, Steele elaborated on his previous revelations by making it known that the CIA helped bankroll Google at its very inception.

    "I think Google took money from the CIA when it was poor and it was starting up and unfortunately our system right now floods money into spying and other illegal and largely unethical activities, and it doesn't fund what I call the open source world," said Steele, citing "trusted individuals" as his sources for the claim.

    "They've been together for quite a while," added Steele.

    Asked to impart to what level Google is "in bed" with the CIA, Steele described the bond as a "small but significant relationship," adding, "it is by no means dominating Google in fact Google has been embarrassed because everything the CIA asked it to do they couldn't do."

    "I also think it's very very wrong of Google to have this relationship," cautioned Steele.

    The former agent went further than before in identifying by name Google's liaison at the CIA.

    "Let me say very explicitly - their contact at the CIA is named Dr. Rick Steinheiser, he's in the Office of Research and Development," said Steele.

    Steele highlighted Google's blatant censorship policies whereby press releases put out by credible organizations that are critical of Dick Cheney and other administration members don't make it to Google News even though they are carried by PR Newswire.

    We have repeatedly highlighted past examples of censorship on behalf of Google, including their blacklisting of a mainstream news website that was mildly critical of China, and also the deliberate stifling and manipulation of Alex Jones' Terror Storm film ranking on Google Video. Google was also caught red-handed attempting to bury the Charlie Sheen 9/11 story at the height of its notoriety.

    Saying Google had become "too big for itself," Steele opined that Google was "long overdue for a public audit."

    "One of the problems with privatized power is that it's not subject to public audit," said Steele, arguing that groups should rally to "put Google out of business unless they're willing to go the open source software route."

    We regularly highlight Google's damaging role in aiding the march towards a big brother society, but the admission that Google were planning on teaming up with the U.S. government to use microphones in the computers of an estimated 150 million-plus Internet active Americans to spy on their lifestyle choices and build psychological profiles which will be used for surveillance and minority report style invasive advertising and data mining, astounded even us.

    Steele said that our previous story about Google's ties to the CIA, which was picked up by dozens of top technology websites, concerned Google enough to lie to the public about it and deny its validity.

    It remains to be seen how Google will react to these latest revelations.

    Listen to the interview with Robert David Steele, in which he also questions the official version of 9/11, by clicking here
  • by aleksiel ( 678251 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @01:09PM (#17132016)
    google search is people!
  • by teh_chrizzle ( 963897 ) <kill-9@hobbiton . o rg> on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @01:17PM (#17132202) Homepage
    google adwords are not exactly a bankable commodity... the fifth entry is often to "buy X on ebay" where X is the thing you are searching for. i currently have filed a class action lawsuit against ebay over their claims that they have the lowest prices on slarphdoojies.
  • by heinousjay ( 683506 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @01:20PM (#17132250) Journal
    Obviously the answer would be to force Microsoft to advocate for its competitors. Nothing else makes sense.
  • by zerocool^ ( 112121 ) on Wednesday December 06, 2006 @04:23PM (#17135808) Homepage Journal
    By "renting out" that "slot" (!)

    Was it really necesary to give us an ascii representation of the female anatomy after you describe it as a slot?

    ~Wx

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...