jginspace writes "As per the advance notification, Microsoft's monthly security bulletin, released yesterday, addressed five general Windows issues and one in Visual Studio. It also included a fix for a problem in Outlook Express for a total of seven updates. As patch Tuesdays go it was fairly unremarkable. The only general Windows update labeled 'critical' is for a flaw in Media Player. As usual, there's a cumulative update for Internet Explorer, but significantly, the only versions of IE affected are 5 and 6. Version 7 is clean — which is welcome news in this first update since the upgrade was pushed to the world last month. Microsoft was silent on the two zero-day Word holes, one reported here and a new one. Sans is calling this 'Black Tuesday' and recommends patches be applied urgently for the Visual Studio and Media Player vulnerabilities. Sans is recommending the Heise Offline Update utility covered in a previous story."
Would I be trolling here if I wondered out loud: Did Microsoft really not find and fix anything with IE7 during the last month that they considered worthy of pushing out with this latest bulletin? Consider that this is the first set of updates since IE7 was pushed out to the whole world and how the inclusion of a patch for IE7 would be met with a jaundiced 'business as usual'. I suppose Microsoft just can't win on this can they?
I fully assume that IE7's phishing filter, like Outlook 2003's Junk Mail Filter, will receive monthly updates from Microsoft to keep it up to date with the latest phising "heuristics".
Depending on your WSUS server's settings, Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filter updates (and likely IE7 phishing filter updates) may appear as "Critical Updates" despite not actually being security patches for %0-day_exploit_01%.
I fully assume that IE7's phishing filter, like Outlook 2003's Junk Mail Filter, will receive monthly updates from Microsoft to keep it up to date with the latest phising "heuristics".
Actually, IE7's anti-phishing technology is server-based. The judgement of a URL as "phish" or "non-phish" is done completely outside of your browser, outside of your own PC even, so there's no need for heuristic, signature, or filter updates to be pushed to users.
They maintain a local whitelist of "sites that definately aren't phishing sites". However, I believe they update that via some sort of background mechanism in IE and not via WU.
The URL is of course hashed before it's transmitted anywhere. So the only sites they can actually recognize are ones that exist in their database as phishing sites. Maybe not hugely comforting, but it's not like they're blasting your browsing behavior back to their servers in plaintext.
Course that didn't stop me from turning it off anyway. I guess there are a lot of retards out there, but I'm not one.
Old news. You can turn the fishing filter off - in fact, when you first run IE7, it asks you if you want to turn it on.
They don't track the computers the filter requests come from. It's certainly techically possible that they could, but conspiracy theories aside, they don't.
You're not alone in your speculation. Leave it to an MS troll to slant non-news away from a non-event.
It is more that IE7 by default is put on the backburner in terms of any kind of update activity, simply because it has only been out a month. Doesn't mean it is clean, and certainly doesn't mean anything significant, by any means.
I'm willing to give MS a month breather, but I'm not willing to give a pass to the clean story, at all.
There's a cross-window injection problem, which could let sleazebuckets.com (if you're viewing them at the same time as you visit your bank) place a popup on top of yourbank.com. This kind of problem is not new. On the one hand that means Microsoft really should have prevented it, on the other hand it means that it's already best practice to have nothing else open when visiting a sensitive site. There's an address bar integrity problem which "could allow phishing". Again, MS should have used their experience
I uninstalled Outlook Express around 2 years ago using "Add/Remove Windows Components".
However, Windows/Microsoft Update keeps applying patches for "Outlook Express".
I'm sure that if I searched my drive for Outlook Express (or the correct search pattern), I would find that Windows never really uninstalled Outlooked Express. Lies lies lies!
If you clicked uninstall and the application failed to uninstall all of it's components then I'd say you own those components compleatly. Please GPL Outlook Express for us.
What a headline... I thought for a second there that they had recalled IE7.
I assume that only security vulnerabilities will be patched in XP's IE7 until Vista is on the same update schedule as XP. These patches will be fashionably late and will only address the most severe issues with the browser, and that simple compatibility glitches will go unanswered. Once Vista is really rolling along there will be more consistency.
How much have the network protocols changed since IE was released? And now in version 7 we actually have a program that can (supposedly) capably utilize the protocols? Hell. I guess this is news.
The article text is not well-written. It makes mention of a "Sans," without bothering to identify what Sans is. I assume they don't mean the SANS Institute? Just rubbish, not at all well-edited.
It's official, IE7 is clean. This shows that Microsoft have gotten all of the bugs and there will be no more patches, ever. Uninstall your virus and spyware scanners - they're not needed anymore.
Seriously, has the situation come to a place for Microsoft where a month with no patches for IE is actually news?
Seriously, has the situation come to a place for Microsoft where a month with no patches for IE is actually news?
Yes. This thing had systems administrators running because of the forced upgrade and general wariness. Now that it's being proven that it won't wreak havoc on corporate systems, I figure some BOFHs will start to ponder a roll-out after blocking it. If it proves in the short-run to be more secure than IE6 (which isn't saying much, of course), they might jump on it.
The reason the corporations have been blocking it is that it breaks many web apps, including ones based on some of the larger vendors' platforms (Oracle, SAP, etc...). At the university where I work they have blocked it because it breaks with our purchasing system.
Yeah, that was the second part of why we blocked it at work; to wait until it got tested out. We haven't noticed any problems with web apps, but then again, we don't run a lot of apps that require client-side plugins/programs, either. Only thing I've seen is some features of SharePoint will crap it out.
Version 7 is clean -- which is welcome news in this first update since the upgrade was pushed to the world last month.
I know you Americans consider "the USA" the same as "the world", but I can assure you that IE7 was NOT pushed out in the Dutch version of Windows XP. It is not even available as an optional package in Windows update. And I think it is the same in many other countries.
Here in the UK, I was notified of it being available by Automatic Update at work on Monday. As I work in the web and we currently have no strategy for dealing with IE7*, I refused and set it not to remind me about it. I have heard of friends who have autoupdate set to download and install automatically who were surprised to find that they'd been upgraded, but that was recently, certainly not "last month". Still, assuming that everyone is in the same situation as you is hardly a uniquely American trait (altho
Last time I checked, it was not even available in Dutch. That may be one of the reasons it is not offered automatically here. Looking at the stats on the webserver at work, I see only 3% of MSIE 7 visitors. This means our visitors, which are mainly from the Netherlands, probably don't get this update pushed automatically. (MSIE 6 is at 78.7% and Windows XP at 68.1%)
Even if you are running Firefox or Opera or something else as your main web browser, upgrading to IE7 (if you are on a system where IE7 will run) still makes sense, if nothing else for all those applications that embed the IE widget which will get the benifits of all the bug fixes IE7 has. (although if said applications are known to fail with IE7 installed, thats a different matter)
does the autoupdater insist on nagging me every 15 minuttes about restarting???? It's so bloody annoying, I know you just updated some of my software, but I'm working so shut the f*** up!
Anyways, you can ask it to bugger off by going to control panel -> administrative tools -> services, find automatic updates, right click and press stop, that will stop it from nagging you about restarting.
I've been doing it for a couple of years now. I have one program I have to RunAs administrator, and I logoff as user, login as admin for WindowsUpdate stuff. All in all, very smooth.
The most annoying thing is that you can't dblclick the tray clock to see the monthly calendar; it thinks you're changing the date, which is admin-only. Fixed in Vista.
I have to say that if there was just one Microsoft product that needed patching, IE7 would most certaily be it. I've had numerous clients complain about the absolute incompetency of this browser to do what it is fundamentally made to do - view web pages. Even on my own system I encountered at least one complete crash of IE7 every..single..day that it was installed, not to mention the painfully slow performance of the product.
Granted, I didn't do everything in my power to make it stable - was running on de
Secunia released a new tool last week. You can use this to verify that you have the latest secure versions of software installed, including MS updates.
http://secunia.com/software_inspector/ [secunia.com]
The organization referred to as Sans in this article is the SANS Internet Storm Center found at http://isc.sans.org/ [sans.org] You can find the reference to Black Tuesday and more information on this update at http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1928 [sans.org]
I'm searching for where SANS has recommended the Heise Security Offline update script and cannot seem to find this information anywhere on the SANS site.
If I can find this evidence it would go a long way towards convincing my security group that my IT organization can use this to develope iso cds.
"I'm searching for where SANS has recommended the Heise Security Offline update script and cannot seem to find this information anywhere on the SANS site. If I can find this evidence it would go a long way towards convincing my security group that my IT organization can use this to develope iso cds."
The SANS homepage changed shortly after the editors published this story. For the last few hours it's been the somewhat underwhelming account: "Microsoft Office 2004 (Mac OS X) update was a accident. (NEW)" .
You know the one who claims not to have caught an STD, but you've seen her around the free clinic a few times? You know the one. She has documents that say she has a clean bill of health but somehow you don't think there's a Doctor Fakopsky.
Then of course you go out with her and the next day you know what falls off? We've all had that experience, haven't we?
Oddly enough that sounds exactly like IE7. I'll stick with my hotter girlfriend, Firefox. It's true she might have "enhancements" and she might be a little "slower" but at least she's not sleeping around like IE.
Yes, you can still keep things reasonably safe; as long as you:
Have a virus scanner that scans all incoming and outgoing email *before* your email program gets at it (For example, AVG, which is free).
Have a firewall -- preferably a hardware firewall, but a good software one like Zonealarm will do at a pinch.
And most importantly -- don't use IE and OE. This isn't any bias on my part, only that any program you use that connects to the internet should be kept completely up to date. Since this is impossib
IE7 really clean? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
*any* new piece of code has bugs, no matter how good the development team.
clean != free of "critical" updates (Score:2)
Depending on your WSUS server's settings, Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filter updates (and likely IE7 phishing filter updates) may appear as "Critical Updates" despite not actually being security patches for %0-day_exploit_01%.
Re:clean != free of "critical" updates (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, IE7's anti-phishing technology is server-based. The judgement of a URL as "phish" or "non-phish" is done completely outside of your browser, outside of your own PC even, so there's no need for heuristic, signature, or filter updates to be pushed to users.
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
Re:clean != free of "critical" updates (Score:4, Insightful)
Even sounds a bit like spyware...
[adds another layer to tinfoil hat]
Parent
Re:clean != free of "critical" updates (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Course that didn't stop me from turning it off anyway. I guess there are a lot of retards out there, but I'm not one.
Phishing Filter (Score:2)
Old news. You can turn the fishing filter off - in fact, when you first run IE7, it asks you if you want to turn it on.
They don't track the computers the filter requests come from. It's certainly techically possible that they could, but conspiracy theories aside, they don't.
Re: (Score:2)
It is more that IE7 by default is put on the backburner in terms of any kind of update activity, simply because it has only been out a month. Doesn't mean it is clean, and certainly doesn't mean anything significant, by any means.
I'm willing to give MS a month breather, but I'm not willing to give a pass to the clean story, at all.
IE7 not clean: Secunia shows 3 unpatched holes (Score:5, Interesting)
http://secunia.com/product/12366/?task=advisories
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
So it appears that the new definition of 'clean' is "we haven't made any patches yet".
Sounds like Stef Murky himself thought up this one...
All better than the days of drive-by downloads (Score:2)
There's an address bar integrity problem which "could allow phishing". Again, MS should have used their experience
But I installed Outlook Express 2 years ago? (Score:1, Interesting)
However, Windows/Microsoft Update keeps applying patches for "Outlook Express".
I'm sure that if I searched my drive for Outlook Express (or the correct search pattern), I would find that Windows never really uninstalled Outlooked Express. Lies lies lies!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Please GPL Outlook Express for us.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You really want to bring down Open Source, don't you?
There's a reason no-one has done that yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Damn. (Score:3, Insightful)
I assume that only security vulnerabilities will be patched in XP's IE7 until Vista is on the same update schedule as XP. These patches will be fashionably late and will only address the most severe issues with the browser, and that simple compatibility glitches will go unanswered. Once Vista is really rolling along there will be more consistency.
Ahhhh (Score:2)
TLF
Article Text Isn't Very Good Journalism (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:1)
clean (Score:5, Funny)
IE 7 Clean (Score:1)
Alright everyone, show's over (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, has the situation come to a place for Microsoft where a month with no patches for IE is actually news?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes. This thing had systems administrators running because of the forced upgrade and general wariness. Now that it's being proven that it won't wreak havoc on corporate systems, I figure some BOFHs will start to ponder a roll-out after blocking it. If it proves in the short-run to be more secure than IE6 (which isn't saying much, of course), they might jump on it.
As much as
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pushed out? (Score:5, Informative)
I know you Americans consider "the USA" the same as "the world", but I can assure you that IE7 was NOT pushed out in the Dutch version of Windows XP. It is not even available as an optional package in Windows update.
And I think it is the same in many other countries.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Still, assuming that everyone is in the same situation as you is hardly a uniquely American trait (altho
Re: (Score:2)
Looking at the stats on the webserver at work, I see only 3% of MSIE 7 visitors. This means our visitors, which are mainly from the Netherlands, probably don't get this update pushed automatically.
(MSIE 6 is at 78.7% and Windows XP at 68.1%)
Re: (Score:2)
The World (Score:2)
I know you Americans consider "the USA" the same as "the world", but I can assure you that IE7 was NOT pushed out in the Dutch version of Windows XP.
Silly you. Dutchistan is in a completely different world - there's an ocean between them.
Re: (Score:2)
Enjoy?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Who owned you today? (Score:1)
In Soviet Union Politburo declare Chernobyl clean.
Enjoy the Zero Day parade, now with improved security.
There is a patch for IE7 available today. (Score:1, Informative)
This update resolves a performance issue with the Phishing Filter.
Why oh why... (Score:5, Informative)
Anyways, you can ask it to bugger off by going to control panel -> administrative tools -> services, find automatic updates, right click and press stop, that will stop it from nagging you about restarting.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The most annoying thing is that you can't dblclick the tray clock to see the monthly calendar; it thinks you're changing the date, which is admin-only. Fixed in Vista.
This news saddens me (Score:1, Troll)
Handy tool - Check for insecure software (Score:2, Interesting)
Sans = SANS Internet Storm Center (Score:2, Informative)
SANS "recommends" the Offline Update tool? (Score:2)
If I can find this evidence it would go a long way towards convincing my security group that my IT organization can use this to develope iso cds.
Re: (Score:2)
The SANS homepage changed shortly after the editors published this story. For the last few hours it's been the somewhat underwhelming account: "Microsoft Office 2004 (Mac OS X) update was a accident. (NEW)" .
IE is clean like that girl you know.. (Score:4, Funny)
Then of course you go out with her and the next day you know what falls off? We've all had that experience, haven't we?
Oddly enough that sounds exactly like IE7. I'll stick with my hotter girlfriend, Firefox. It's true she might have "enhancements" and she might be a little "slower" but at least she's not sleeping around like IE.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)