Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses The Internet Patents

Google Patents the Design of Search Results Page 114

prostoalex writes "ZDNet is reporting that USPTO issued a patent to Google, Inc. for 'ornamental design for a graphical user interface'. This is not, as ZDNet points out, a software patent (which is usually issued as a utility patent), but a design patent, which governs the look and feel of the product and prevents others from directly copying it." Ironic, given Google's recent slip-up of copying a Yahoo page. In news on the flipside, Google has launched a patent search service (in beta).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Patents the Design of Search Results Page

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 14, 2006 @09:45AM (#17235364)
    Design patents aren't "look and feel" they're "exact look". Unlike utility patents, a design patent covers one thing and one thing only: the decorative appearance of something. So I can make a doorknob that looks a particular way, and since it's a physical object and not a play, song, book, whatever, it's not copyrightable but with the design patent, I can prevent other companies from making the exact same doorknob. But I can't stop them from making a "kind of roundish square doorknob", which was the idea behind the feel part of the "look and feel" patent attempt.
  • RTFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by Frankie70 ( 803801 ) on Thursday December 14, 2006 @10:40AM (#17236160)

    On the subject of them "copying" a Yahoo page:

    Has anyone thought that maybe, just maybe, that's a template provided by Microsoft? You know, since it's pitching the IE7 upgrade and all that.


    From the article [zawodny.com],
    Quote "And I've checked with our PR group to make sure that this wasn't just a template that Microsoft gave to all partners. It's not." Unquote.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 14, 2006 @11:03AM (#17236584)
    How the heck can a perfect functional duplicate of a complete menu tree be OK, but a vague organization of elements on a web screen be copyrightable?

    Probably because Lotus didn't bother to get a design patent on their interface. This may have something to do with them ripping off the interface from VisiCalc in the first place.

  • by jbeaupre ( 752124 ) on Thursday December 14, 2006 @11:22AM (#17236896)
    Since so many people are confused as to what a design patent is :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patent [wikipedia.org]

    And for those of you too lazy to even click: "In the United States, a design patent is a patent granted on the ornamental design of a functional item. Design patents are a type of industrial design right. Ornamental designs of jewelry, furniture, beverage containers (see Fig. 1) and computer icons are examples of what can be protected with design patents."

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...