Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Technology

First Cellphone Use On Airplane Given OK 305

s31523 writes "With over 1 billion cell phone users worldwide, and with so many business travelers, using the cell phone on the airplane has been a recent hot topic. Emirate airlines is announcing they will give the OK for cell phone use on their planes, making them the first airline to do so. The FCC and FAA still ban the use, but are working to determine safety implications, if any."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Cellphone Use On Airplane Given OK

Comments Filter:
  • Re:To those confused (Score:2, Interesting)

    by fdrebin ( 846000 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:11PM (#17329736)
    More like the WASP [wikipedia.org] answer to excessive provocation.

    Perhaps my comment is best viewed with a sense of humor... It was intended to convey displeasure, hopefully to not actually predict the future.

    /F

  • by bananaendian ( 928499 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:15PM (#17329824) Homepage Journal

    This "Cellphones in Airplanes" type of article appears periodically in /. and every time I have to rise from my grave to correct the false speculation about cellphones interfering with avionics.

    Cellphones do not cause aircraft to crash and burn! There. Thank you.

    Here's my longer explanation for those interested: Avionics ABC [slashdot.org]

    Airlines offering the use of GSM cellphone services equip the cabin with a basestation similar to one used RF-secure buildings and underground facilities. It will handle all the calls within the cabin and connect to the phone network via satellite datalink. It's all compatible, safe and tested method that has been used for years now on business jets.

  • by zoftie ( 195518 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:22PM (#17329922) Homepage
    Thats what earlugs are for. :) I think they should mandate though microphone masks, so they keep their sounds to their face. Or something like talk booths where they go and talk all they want.
  • Re:Counting down... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Stanistani ( 808333 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:23PM (#17329936) Homepage Journal
    Ah, but you never know which straw is the one that finally blows out the camel's back, do you?
    Let's hope at some point airlines and our security apparatus will try to improve the airline travel experience.

    Enabling cellphone use on airliners ain't it.
  • by Abcd1234 ( 188840 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:39PM (#17330188) Homepage
    Nah, what you really want are a pair of canalphones. Personally, I have a pair of Shure's which were a godsend on my last flight, when I got to experience two cowboy-types behind me spending a full hour talking loud enough for half the cabin to hear them...
  • by jav27 ( 603992 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @05:41PM (#17330220)
    I think the rates that Emirates will charge are about $2 per minute. not bad compared to Airphone rates, but still expensive enough to make most people cautious about long use. Most likely on top of the $2 per minute, the carrier will also bill you for international roaming.
  • by AlpineR ( 32307 ) <wagnerr@umich.edu> on Thursday December 21, 2006 @06:00PM (#17330526) Homepage

    I don't care about being able to use my cellphone, but can I please use other electronics on the airplane?

    I'd love to listen to my iPod for the entirety of my flight, not just the half hour between reaching cruising altitude and beginning descent. Ideally I could put the earbuds in when I sit down and keep them while we taxi, fly, taxi, deboard, and collect our luggage. The flight attendents would treat me as a terrorist if I did that now.

  • Re:Counting down... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by lymond01 ( 314120 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @06:17PM (#17330768)
    I was in front of this guy a few years back. He's on his cellphone, talking to his credit card company. He's trying to be quiet about it, but ends up giving them his full name, card info, mother's maiden name, and some password (I was surprised by this last one until I tried to talk to my own CC company recently...they were looking at the wrong account which apparently needed a password to access. When I gave them my account number again, my account wasn't password protected.).

    So I've already had my pad of paper out for a few minutes, I jot down all his information. When my stop comes, before his, I stand up, make a show of tearing the page out of my notebook, fold it up, and hand it to him. "Be more careful," I tell him, and walk off.

    And I'm not sure why some people talk so loudly on the cell phone. I don't fly often, but I agree with others...let people text or something, but no calls please.
  • Re:To those confused (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Dun Malg ( 230075 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @09:01PM (#17332396) Homepage

    you always get some jackass who talk at top volume on their mobiles for hours

    Anyone ever figured out why people talk louder on cellphones? Are they actually talking louder, or is it just a perception we have? Is it because on of their ears isn't available to hear back their loud talking so they compensate? A J. Seinfeld would say, "What's the deal?"

    Regular phones have what is called "sidetone", which is your own voice coming out your earpiece. This is the natural result of all parties on a landline communicating on the same circuit. This feedback mechanism essentially allows you to monitor your own volume level by letting you hear what the other person is hearing. Cell phones, on the other hand, do not have sidetone. Your outgoing voice and the other party's incoming voice are on two separate channels. Since people are not "trained" on the use of cell phones, and are even somewhat programmed by landline usage to expect sidetone, they exercise little control over their volume levels. Since the automatic reaction to not hearing your own voice clearly in a sidetone system is to speak louder, the ones that really shout into their cells are mindless morons who are allowing their programmed behavior on landline phones to happen on their cells.

    Basically, it comes down to this: if they're speaking above a normal conversational tone on a cell, then they're unthinking fools who can't adjust to lack of sidetone because they're too stupid to realize it's not there. The world is full of unthinking fools.
  • by Dynedain ( 141758 ) <slashdot2 AT anthonymclin DOT com> on Thursday December 21, 2006 @09:38PM (#17332682) Homepage
    Did I say I am making those calls? Did I say I want to annoy you?

    No.

    All I am expressing is that there are people that need to be able to be reached anytime, anywhere, and that the statement "Nobody is so important they can't be unreachable for a few hours." is completely false in the modern world.
  • by Gordo_1 ( 256312 ) on Thursday December 21, 2006 @10:53PM (#17333146)
    And the FAA knows it.

    Yes, I know... Mythbusters showed that a hugely amplified transmitter placed practically on top of the instrumentation could have a measurable effect. There was little even remotely cell-phone-like about the experiment at that point.

    Do you really think that after all the Draconian (though mostly useless) security checks they put you though at the airport, the FAA would just say, "oh well, there's this real threat posed to flight avionics by cell phones, but we'll just ask the airlines to have flight attendants smile and ask passengers to put their cell phones in 'Airplane mode' when they hand out pretzels"?

    No, they wouldn't. If they really thought that planes might go down from cell phone transmissions, they'd make you take out your cell phone battery at security and place it in a lead box with a key and then they'd scan the checked luggage compartment for cell signal and empty your socks and underwear on the tarmac in search of offending devices.

    Does anyone seriously think that of the thousands of flights and hundreds of thousands of passengers that fly in the US every day, not a single one of them receives an SMS, voicemail or email during flight? Likely billions of cell phone data/voice packets find their way to and from cell phones sitting in planes during takeoff, flight and landing every day.

    It's not crashing flights.
  • by FirienFirien ( 857374 ) on Friday December 22, 2006 @05:22AM (#17335048) Homepage
    I remember an earlier post here something like a year ago, when one person left his phone on while in his two-seater (mechanical control = less worry about getting bricked out of the sky even if you're pretty sure it shouldn't interfere).

    He mentioned he got a cease-and-desist-please letter from his provider, because his phone being in contact with so many cells at once was causing their network to shit itself.

    As mentioned above - the problem is that, unlike wifi, the cellphone is designed to hand off seamlessly as you travel between cells. Think of 802.11s, wireless mesh networking, which measures signal strength and reconfigures the shared network to suit. If you have one box racing across the grid at high speed, it'll be reconfiguring hard and fast as the signal strengths change and it works out where the box should fit at each given instance. If you have 50, or however many you'd normally have on a commercial airline, the system will shit bricks. Routing packets outwards is easy - to route inwards you need to know where to send to, and if you're going fast enough then you're racing the sum of (signal (negligible) + processor cost of working out where you are + switches + rerouting + collision detection...)

    On a lighter note, if you have a satellite phone you're probably ok.

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...