A Sneak Preview of KDE 4 350
An anonymous reader writes "In recent times, a lot of discussion has been generated about the state of KDE version 4.0 and as Linux users we are ever inquisitive about what the final user experience is going to be. This article throws light on some of the features that we can look forward to when KDE 4.0 is finally released some time this year. The article indicates that the most exciting fact about KDE 4.0 is going to be that it is developed using the Qt 4.0 library. This is significant because Qt 4.0 is released under a GPL license even for non-Unix platforms. So this clears the ideological path for KDE 4.0 to be ported to Windows and other non-Unix/X11 platforms."
great (Score:2, Insightful)
Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:2, Insightful)
I wish they'd follow GNOME or Firefox and realise that overloading the senses with tabs, buttons and checkboxes does not make for a pleasant desktop experience. I'd be happy if all KDE 4 consisted of was a rationalisation of the menus and prefs to slash out most of the crap, or at least move it into an advanced mode where only masochists could see it.
Re:From dot.kde.org (Score:3, Insightful)
Glad you mentioned that before I posted! I was about to rant about how much I hate the look of that start menu. It looks too similar to the Windows XP, expanding-to-fill-the-screen-with-icons-all-over-t he-place one which drives me mad. That said, I do occasionally have trouble finding seldom-used stuff within my KDE start menu (is $APP under Settings, Utilities or System?), so I know my current set-up isn't brilliant either.
KDE vs. Gnome (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Kstill Ktoo Kmany Koptions (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes.
KFG
Re:You know that... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:3, Insightful)
No it doesn't give everyone a desktop they're comfortable with. If you put twice as many options in a user's face than they would reasonably expect or ever require they are going to get confused. They'll be scared of even opening prefs or menus for fear of trashing their app or desktop. As I said, if somebody in the minority absolutely needs all those options, create some tool for them to get at them or implement an advanced mode that shows them. For example, I can type about:config into Firefox and fiddle with all the options, without inflicting them on regular users. And Windows has TweakUI and regedit.
There is a very good reason that the likes of Apple, and to a lesser extent Windows & GNOME hide options - it makes the desktop more accessible, more productive and easier to use for everybody. Expecting the vast majority to wade through crap makes for a terrible user experience. Regardless of what advantages KDE might offer over GNOME in other ways I know which side my money would be on in a usability lab.
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:3, Insightful)
Have you ever had the feeling that "this program is awesome, but there's this really annoying tiny thing I wish I could easily change"? I had a couple of these with GNOME last time I tried it, and I've never had this with KDE 3.x.
GNOME is already a good, clean desktop. KDE is the good, customizable desktop. It's better to have one of each, rather than two of the same, don't you think?
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:4, Insightful)
Likewise, GNOME hides the options so deep as well, that only a poweruser spending the day on Google is ever going to even figure out how to get to them.
At least KDE (and Windows) put the options where you can find them using just the normal flow of the GUI.
This whole "assume the user is a drooling moron or an ubergeek, with *nothing* in-between" really puts off a lot of "competent" Windows users.
Re:Still not there yet.. (Score:4, Insightful)
But if you mean just the window manager and such, and not Quanta/Konqueror/Konsole... I'd have to pass. KDE is useful to me. It's not about looks.
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:5, Insightful)
Disagree.
I use Gnome because I have a million and one things to do and so long as the interface isn't annoying, looks ok and doesn't get in the way, then it's good for me.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a power, business and techie user. When KDE 1 came out I spent loads of happy minutes changing every setting just to how i liked it on my home PC. Partly because I could and partly because I found the default kde setup annoying.
I now use Ubuntu (at work) and have never felt the urge to change a single option. Now, the techie in me wants to do cool things at a PC, not change how the taskbar looks.
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:5, Insightful)
Hear hear!
You're so right! I wish the KDE team would realise that a pleasant desktop experience involves editing
What is thin about it? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Kool! (Score:4, Insightful)
MSPerhaps, MSthat MSshould MSstop MSeverywhere.
.netof
ior imaybe iyour igrip is inothing.
Pardon my ignorance... (Score:4, Insightful)
GTD Anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
I use KDE for the sheer convenience and ease of use. Windows seems like it's virtually stood still in time for the last four or five years. KDE has far surpassed it, ease-of-use-wise. Gnome is still such a joke. I don't get it. How is it that Firefox, Thunderbird (at least on Linux) and other packages have to emulate Gnome when it comes to: finding files (GIMP and Firefox try to be so Gnome-like -- sucks!), the whole "Would you like to do this? No? Yes?" anti-natural-language (but oh-so geek-orthodox) OK / Cancel thing. Why do so many distros (Red Hat, Ubuntu) have Gnome as the default? Makes no sense.
I'll trade a little "bloat" for "getting things done" any time.
Re:GTD Anyone? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's like the Motorola 68020 architecture and Assembly instruction set vs Intel's convoluted silicon / Assembly instruction set. Why, oh why did the Intel processor have to become the most popular?! Well, back in the day, when board layout and Assembly code mattered, it mattered, OK?
Re:Less of the kitchen sink would make KDE better (Score:2, Insightful)