Apple and Google to Blog the World 218
Zrop writes "AppleInsider is reporting that Apple has been working on OS-level integration of an geographical mapping technology as an integral part of Leopard, its next-generation OS. The technology is rumoured to employ GPS functionality. Will GPS chips make Apple iPod phones and MacBooks location aware? Users would be able to post information at a location, hanging in the air, ready to be browsed by people passing by. Imagine getting highly relevant messages, without even pressing a button, simply because you are in the vicinity and your preferences match the content of the post."
You mean... (Score:5, Insightful)
"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Why is it that when apple does this kind of thing it's somehow "cool", but when Microsoft does it, it's somehow "evil"?
Will this "feature" have an off button? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because when Apple does it, it becomes a well documented [apple.com], open [webkit.org] API. Microsoft? Not so much [microsoft.com].
BBS Lession 12,102 (Score:1, Insightful)
I guess as long as you know the worst people will take over this kind of a system... you can still get something useful out of it.
Re:Will this "feature" have an off button? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't remember everybody freaking out. That would surely make the world news, and lead to civil chaos, if the entire population of the planet started "freaking out." I don't remember anybody freaking out, actually. A few people raised some privacy concerns, yes. Not the same thing as everybody freaking out.
Actually, the majority of the posts so far are talking about ways this could be abused, and a sprinkling of "Apple is teh suck" posts. I haven't yet seen anyone on slashdot say it is "cool" or put a happy spin on it.
GPS + Ipod (Score:5, Insightful)
I like Gmail's targeted adverts (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Will this "feature" have an off button? (Score:4, Insightful)
If "the man" wanted to know where you were at any given time, it's not like it was hard before. The serial number 'scare' (if you can really call it that) was different because it reported information unrelated to any communication purpose. With wireless devices of any kind, you're already broadcasting your location by using it (even just having it turned on), so it's really a non-issue. Why not provide the option of doing something with it?
The difference between Microsoft and just about anyone else (including Apple) is that Microsoft would turn it on by default without any real security concerns, and it would "integrate" with a soldering iron. Take Media Center for instance--if you choose "satellite" in the setup, you CAN'T continue if it doesn't detect an MCE-compatible IR receiver (even if you don't want to use it). You also can't cheat by calling your connection "cable" and then choosing a satellite lineup. Microsoft is too smart for that. With this, it's like texting to a bulletin board (the cork-and-pin variety). You can put something up there that might be helpful to someone else--but you aren't obligated to post anything, nor are you obligated to read any of it.
Re:Too complicated for laptops (Score:3, Insightful)
http://www.geospatialexperts.com/ricoh.html [geospatialexperts.com]
http://scilib.typepad.com/science_library_pad/200
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Will this "feature" have an off button? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since when did Apple sign illegal OEM deals that forced OEMs to not ship competing products to prevent them from entering the market?
Next.
Physical location is a meat phenomenon. (Score:2, Insightful)
At least on an Internet forum I stand a reasonable chance of meeting people I actually want to talk to, and where they are physically located is irrelevant.
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Want a good example? Compare the documentation for OS X and Windows on the same equivalent subject:
http://www.google.com/search?q=exception.port+sit
http://www.google.com/search?q=vectored.exception
One has a two line blurb, the other has a full article and API documentation.
As for openness, well, they only use standards when they're useful to them. They have a half-assed implementation of the MPEG standard, for example. They also use proprietary connectors, such as ADC(now dead) and mini-DVI.
Has its drawbacks, but could be useful (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, abuse would be just as easy as messing up a wiki page, but that hasn't stopped their popularity either.
I don't see why this would have to be tied into an OS though, and it would make more sense for phones than laptops. Once we have cheap unlimited GPRS/UMTS connections, that is.
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:3, Insightful)
A more interesting answer is, 'because their software sucks'. If Microsoft's software was better, they would have some fans, and on social websites like this one there wouldn't be such a strong prevailing dislike of them.
Obviously apple also engages in evil business ethics. But because they have fans, they can get away with it a bit more. Microsoft has, as far as I can tell, no fans. I am a long-time PC owners, and I don't give a toss about the monopolistic and unethical behaviour of either company, but I couldn't look you in the eye and say that Microsoft ships really good products. This is why I don't spring to their defense if some Mac or Linux fan calls them 'evil'.
Re:WHO CARES what Apple intends to use it for... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:WHO CARES what Apple intends to use it for... (Score:1, Insightful)
wrong place instead? You know, to let you know you weren't
in the right place.
Re:"integration" or "bundling"? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:WHO CARES what Apple intends to use it for... (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, that all depends on your definition of "place." For example, is the meeting room a "place," or is the whole office building a "place?" If it's on the former scale, maybe you have the situation where you want to be reminded of the meeting if you're in your office, but not if you're in the meeting room. But if it's the latter, maybe you want to be reminded to go, say, get something from a particular coworker before you leave. Also, it can even depend on the transitions between places. For example, if you're transitioning from work to home maybe you want to be reminded to get milk on the way when you get near the grocery store, but if you're transitioning in the opposite direction (or to a different destination entirely) you don't.
In other words, it depends a lot on context. For a more detailed investigation of the kind of thing I'm talking about, read this [atl.ga.us] (note: PDF).
Re:I can graphiti the WORLD! (Score:2, Insightful)