YouTube Blocked in Brazil 387
keeboo writes "The popular video sharing site YouTube is now blocked in Brazil due to a local court decision last Thursday. The site was ordered to block the uploaded sex videos of Brazilian media starlet Daniela Cicarelli and, although it complied, many users kept re-uploading it to the site. After the failure of YouTube to keep the video off of the site, the domain was blocked nationwide at a DNS level. Predictably, many Brazilians are annoyed and I've started to receive even SPAMs protesting on this blocking. From the article: 'The case now goes automatically to a three-member panel of judges who will decide whether to make the order permanent and whether to fine YouTube as much as US$119,000 (euro91,000) for each day the video was viewable, said Rubens Decousseau Tilkian.'"
Re:The inevietable obligatory question. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not so sure... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Funny (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Work around? (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.opendns.com/
Silly politicians, thinking they can block by hostname and keep the server inaccessable...
Only effective way to do it is by IP, and then you have to be sure to watch for IP changes.
Re:If the internet works as advertised (Score:4, Informative)
www.youtube.com has address 208.65.153.253
www.youtube.com has address 208.65.153.241
www.youtube.com has address 208.65.153.242
www.youtube.com has address 208.65.153.245
Re:Funny (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Funny (Score:2, Informative)
Some interesting points:
I'm accessing youtube from Brazil right now. The judge's decision was not clear as to wheter only the video be censored for Brazil, or the whole site be blocked. Cicarelli's lawyer seems to think that the whole site should be blocked from all the 8 backbones that serve internet connectivity to Brazil. Nobody else seems to interpret the judge's decision that way. This issue will be clarified monday.
Renato Malzoni Filho is from a very rich and influent family (go figure). They are in fact fighting against any common sense, everybody in the media is saying how absurd is to try to block a whole site in the whole country. It could backfire. In fact, it already did; everyone in Brazil is downloading said video from other sources just because it was on the news.
The video is pretty boring, there are much more hardcore stuffs on brazilian dramas.
Re:If the internet works as advertised (Score:4, Informative)
Re:If the internet works as advertised (Score:5, Informative)
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www.youtube.com
Addresses: 208.65.153.245, 208.65.153.251, 208.65.153.253, 208.65.153.241
208.65.153.242
Re:If the internet works as advertised (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The inevietable obligatory question. (Score:4, Informative)
2:26
4:07
It was pretty obvious what was going on in the water. (that's probably why they went in the water)
Re:Work around? (Score:5, Informative)
No, it was not a DNS block. Brasil Telecom (serving south, center-west and part of the north) blocked it, probably using route or packet filters against youtube IP addresses.
There was a judge that ordered the video down and the remedy was decided by a justice from a state supreme court. Only it seems that the justice thought that he was ordering only the video down, because it seems he was told that carriers would just have to implement filters, which they are capable of doing (they are). According to an interview he gave, he thinks that those filters would only block that video.
I wrote about that in my crappy vox blog here [vox.com].
They haven't grasped the concept of "Internet"... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Work around? (Score:3, Informative)
uh, i was checking for research purposes.
Brazilian Media says the blacklist is not true (Score:4, Informative)
Read yourself (in Portuguese) at Folha de Sao Paulo [uol.com.br] or, use Google Translator [google.com] to translate it.
"The version of that all the YouTube would have of being removed of air arrived to be propagated by some Brazilian sites and international agencies in the thursday, but it was contradicted by the Court of Justice. Justice only determined that the YouTube hinders the propagation it video with Daniela Cicarelli."
Re:Work around? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:The inevietable obligatory question. (Score:5, Informative)
So... (Score:3, Informative)
Quite simple, really. Not sure if Youtube's videos will work (which would make it a useless workaround), but translating from (for example) Chinese Simplified to English will usually ensure you get non-altered text (it being a different character set the engine's looking for and all. You could also technically use one of the following IP's if it's just blocked at the domain level (Youtube's linking seems to be all relative):
208.65.153.242
208.65.153.245
208.65.153.251
208.65.153.253
208.65.153.241
And then there's the obligatory mention of Tor [eff.org].
Yes, I also realize that my first method is cruelly aligned to anglophones.
its not blocked (Score:2, Informative)
Cicarelli lawyers said bullshit as it would block google in Brazil, of course court order dimissed it and just asked google to comply.
Re:The inevietable obligatory question. (Score:3, Informative)
What, this video? (Score:4, Informative)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-28835788
Why, what, where, who, when (Score:5, Informative)
In Brazil, there have been over 3,510,804 norms and regulations published in the last 18 years alone. This averages 534 per day or 783 per work day (source,in Portuguese, here [ibpt.com.br]) (If you read Spanish, you read Portugese). Any corporation in Brazil is bound to have a gigantic body of lawyers. The whole system is about to collapse, but there's no sign of a legal reform. There are too many laws, and too many stupid decisions. Until recently, it was possible to maneuver in legal waters to a point that even trivial matters went to the Supreme Court. By trivial, I mean a dog biting the neighbour. Can you even imagine that in the U.S of A.? Also, judges here have too much power, it would seem. Even when they are complete and utter imbecils, as seems to be the case. Were I on a Brazilian blog, BTW, I would not dare say I thought the judge was an imbecil, though.
Also, there is such a thing in the civil code as "the right to one's own image." This means that you have the right to control the use of your image. However, it would seem that fucking in a public beach, when you are a celebrity of sorts would preclude to right to pledge the right to such right. Am I being clear? I mean, there have been all sorts of pornographic interpretation of individual rights. I recently witnessed a complete douchebag seriously threaten with a lawsuit a list moderator. The guy had been expelled because of bad behaviour, but he went on to take legal action on the ground his "right to expression" was being denied. I bet he's got a 50-50 chance of pulling it off, too. All sorts of weird shit like this in Brazil. Another fun one was a judge ruling spam was ok, because it didn't "waste any material resources" (that was circa 1996, though). Oh, yeah, and the Brazilian Constitution does not grant you the right to express yourslef anonymously. Huh.
There have been cases, for instance, of cartoonists being sued because of portraying politicians in what was judged to be "excessive" ridicule. Now, either that is the job of a cartoonist that specializes in political satire or I just really should be just as well living in Iran, Cuba or China. All this means is that Brazil, sadly, has little garantees of real freedom of expression. Just about every newspaper has to waste a huge amount of money and time in courts. I wouldn't say it would be wise to have a blog and express one's opinion as openly as people do in the United States, in Brazil. Chances are, they'll sue your pants off. Unless you are working in a big media outlet, you're dead meat. In a more shameful example, when NYT reporter Larry Rother suggested in an article that Brazil's president had a penchant for heavy drinking, the president and his acolytes considered actually banning Mr. Rother form the country. They went bananas.
We will live yet to see the day when Google gets blocked in Brazil, because they refused to remove a link to press material judged "offensive" to corrupt politicos. You'll see... There'll come a time I'll probably ask for political exile somewhere. When they ask me why, I'll answer: "Because living in Brazil fucks too much with my head and I'll become a mental case, sooner or later."
Re:Work around? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Work around? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Work around? (Score:3, Informative)
I recently discovered that BrTurbo blocks, besides youtube now, nasa.gov and perform traffic shaping. They should have used the court decision as an excuse to stop users from using one of the biggest bandwidth consuming sites.
Re:As a brazillian (luckily ouside the country) (Score:1, Informative)
Too bad. I'm about to leave this country for good. Too much social gapping, too much illiteracy, too much belly button sighting and terrible television. There seems to be no initiative for a change, neither from politicians nor from the voters.
Re:What, this video? (Score:2, Informative)
It will be a long time to me decide to go back to Brazil... long long time...