Unofficial Win2K Daylight Saving Time Fix 299
Saturn2003a writes "Microsoft has stated that they will not be offering a patch for the new US Daylight Saving Time for Windows 2000 and earlier. Only customers with an extended support agreement can get a Hotfix from Microsoft. To get around this, IntelliAdmin has created an unofficial patch (source code provided) that will fix Daylight Saving Time on Windows 2000 and Windows NT machines."
Re:Hm... (Score:3, Insightful)
Ford aint giving garantee for their 2000 models cars either.
And Ford doesn't get my business either. 10 year / 100,000 miles. Thank you Kia and Suzuki.
And a big middle finger to Microsoft for this move.
I've got a fix (Score:2, Insightful)
Win2k (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hm... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hm... (Score:3, Insightful)
Warranty - and safety - are also the reasons I went with a Kia Sportage. Manufacturer support counts for a lot, the sense that they will stand behind their product. That's also why I've been an OSX user for the last few years. Microsoft would have to make huge changes for me to go back. Apple simply does a better job. There's a bonus, too; old Windows machines make great linux-based servers. :)
Re:and it's.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Win2k (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually, i think 3.51 takes the cake. It was a solid machine, and was the first OS with the new interface (if installed from the CD as the "experimental" interface.)
Re:My fix - avoid vendors that act like assholes. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:There IS an official fix (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:DST in some countries changes every year... (Score:2, Insightful)
The thing is, Microsoft has provided a fix, but only to customers with Extended Support [microsoft.com].
I don't know if there is some technical reason why Microsoft is unable to simply make it available to everyone on the Windows Update website, but I suspect this is simply another opportunity for them to keep the old forced-upgrade treadmill running.
Re:The fix (Score:1, Insightful)
Good luck with your solution...
Re:I'll stretch it (Score:5, Insightful)
And now for another episode of, "Good Idea, Bad Idea"
Seriously... downloading patches from a website operated by the government?
Re:Why the 3rd party patch? (Score:3, Insightful)
But they're still an asshole. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not that W2K is broken that makes M$ an asshole in all of this. It's that they have a patch available for those who have paid for extended support, but they won't release it for the general public.
Since the cost to produce the patch has already been absorbed by M$, the only reason to withhold the patch is to make people frustrated with W2K to encourage them to upgrade. When you can readily fix something, but you don't, so that people will upgrade, well, then, your an asshole.
Re:It's not like there are no other options (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hm... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The fix (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:What about Linux? (Score:3, Insightful)