Install Vista Upgrade Without Preexisting XP 196
Johannes K. writes "It has previously been claimed that to install Windows Vista from an upgrade DVD requires having Windows XP installed on your computer. DailyTech reports on a workaround: no previous version of Windows is required at all." Anyone know whether this workaround moots the finding by LXer that during upgrade Microsoft invalidates your original XP CD-key?
No evidence for XP key invalidation (Score:5, Informative)
Is there any evidence whatsoever that Microsoft will invalidate XP keys for their WGA check (because they'll certainly still work to install the media) if you upgrade that installation of XP to Vista? Has anyone actually tried it?
Certainly, Microsoft could probably link the two installations, if you do an actual upgrade. If they can do that, what do you think they'll do to 'upgrade' copies that were installed using the Vista->Vista trick? Maybe they'll wait awhile, then decide that these copies are 'pirate' installations, and lock you out of upgrades (possibly drop you down to degraded mode) until you pay a fee to convert your installation to a Full install.
Instructions from the article... (Score:5, Informative)
1. Boot with the Windows Vista Upgrade DVD.
2. Click "Install Now."
3. Do not enter a Product Key When prompted.
4. When prompted, select the Vista product edition that you do have.
6. Install Vista normally.
7. Once the install is complete, restart the DVD-based Setup from within Windows Vista. Perform an in-place upgrade. 8. Enter your Product Key when prompted.
EULA is still unclear (Score:4, Informative)
The problem is that the upgrade version invalidates the agreement for XP, which means you are not allowed to re-install XP, which is needed to re-install Vista...
I suppose this work-around does allow you to re-install Vista, but they may well remove this in the future.
I submitted a support request to Microsoft about this a few days ago, but they haven't responded.
That's the plan (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Oh great so now I need a DVD player? (Score:3, Informative)
Alternative way to install from upgrade disc (Score:5, Informative)
1.) create \windows\system32\ on any partition you want (even extended partitions)
2.) copy a validated 'legitcontrolcheck.dll file into the directory.
3.) you might need ntdetect.com and ntldr in the root, (try without)
(I've not tested this)
Re:What a solution. (Score:3, Informative)
I did a re-install on Vista the other night (not because I had to, but because I wanted to test differences between 64 and 32 bit). I slicked the partition, and started the re-install. I looked over at the screen a few minutes later, and it had progressed so far I wondered for a second if I'd forgotten to wipe the partition and it wasn't really re-copying all the files. So far, it's been under a half-hour from first boot to working system.
Note, however, that this is installing from DVD. I don't know if the performance/process is different installing off of CD.
Slashdot FUD (Score:1, Informative)
How about, "invalid question since Vista doesn't do that?". Please stop trying to be the new digg and spreading misinformation.
Re:Still asking questions? Ok here are MY suggesti (Score:3, Informative)
Translation may be a bit off, didn't understand a few of the details
- BIOS (bios ID) (not bios upgrade) (9 points)
For those of you interested (or Norwegian), the blog article is here [msdn.com]Re:Use a dodgy XP key (Score:3, Informative)
Is is painful, since you have to install vista twice (once for the trial, then once for the upgrade from the trial), but it does give you a steep discount from the "full" version, without requiring any old version at all.
How long it is until MS fixes this loophole is anybodies guess, but as of right now, it works.
Re:What a solution. (Score:4, Informative)
And don't say that doesn't matter if the keys don't get invalidated. If you are going to completely ignore the EULA, why are you not just pirating it in the first place?
Because ignoring a EULA which hasn't been proven to have any force in law and probably isn't worth the bits it occupies on the disk is a lot different to downloading the entire software without paying for it and installing it without any kind of license? Most licenses have to stand up to a test of reasonableness at the very least before they can have any kind of binding effect - if I have a legitimate copy of XP and install a Vista upgrade, don't like it and go back to XP I'd not have a hard time arguing in court that it was unreasonable for the EULA to prevent me doing this. To say that I have to either accept a blatantly unreasonable EULA or download pirated software and these are my only options is just wrong, the third option is to contest the EULA (and the fourth is to use *nix of course... or is that the first?)
Re:Pointless to do this to save money. (Score:4, Informative)
Then, according to MS, you're SOL. At some point, with either a completely new system rebuild or enough significant upgrades, your OEM license will be invalidated.
You could probably call up and beg MS, but they are under no obligation to issue you a new key or reactivate your old one.
Am I a genius and know all about this stuff? No, it's just what I understand to be the case after reading the comments from from linked article, where they raise the same question.
On a side note, I just bought XP-Pro. It comes with a free upgrade to Vista. If I can use that upgrade for a different system using this hack, then WOOHOO! A two-fer!
Re:What a solution. (Score:4, Informative)
With Vista, the installer now simply decompress an image file to your hard drive.
One can read on about WIM here and how to create and manipulate such images yourself: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsvista/a
A less technical article here: http://www.apcstart.com/3834/inside_vistas_new_im
Re:What a solution. (Score:3, Informative)
My "upgrade" did not invalidate anything. I can still use Windowsupdate.Microsoft.Com on both boxes with WGA.
FYI...two separate partitions on the same box, booting using a custom boot loader.
Confirmed, and why this is important (Score:5, Informative)
Why is this important? Because a clean Vista install is strongly preferred to an in-place upgrade install (munging your existing XP installation so it's now a Vista installation); but Microsoft does not allow this [microsoft.com]: "you cannot use an upgrade key to perform a clean installation of Windows Vista". This same Microsoft Knowledge Base article then provides a workaround, the same thing discussed by DailyTech and WindowsSecrets: "Start the installation from a compliant version of Windows, such as Windows Vista, Microsoft Windows XP, or Microsoft Windows 2000. After you have started the installation, you can select Custom at the installation choice screen to perform a clean installation."
I'm glad for this particular huge security hole, but it makes me wonder how many more they are.
Re:Instructions from the article... (Score:3, Informative)
Just saying perform a in-place upgrade could lead to misunderstanding and confusion.
Re:Use a dodgy XP key (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not gonna do it since I have legal XP already, and I don't want Vista. But Brian Livingston (of windowssecrets.com) argues that Microsoft put this loophole in intentionally, so it's ethical to do. I have my doubts, but. . .