BBC Strikes Deal With YouTube 156
twofish writes "Google's YouTube video site will soon be showing content from the BBC in a deal announced today. Auntie Beeb's content will be spread across three different channels, one for news and two for entertainment programmes. Content will include adverts, and clips from shows such as "Top Gear," "The Mighty Boosh," and nature shows narrated by David Attenborough. The deal is likely to be controversial, particularly since the BBC is paid for by a compulsory tax system (the license fee) rather than through advertising or subscription. The article goes on to say that they won't be 'hunting down' people that upload their content to YouTube. Just the same, they reserve the right to take down or remove programmes that have run on their channels which might damage relationships; examples might be football offerings or 'edited' shows."
Adverts... (Score:5, Insightful)
-sheriff
Finally (Score:4, Insightful)
And for commercial stations that would be even better - they would be able to add some of advertising, or such.
oh my god! the ignorance! it burns! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:A compulsory Tax system (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not really a "compulsory" tax. You're obliged to pay the license fee if you own a television tuner set to recieve broadcast television stations.
This is, as you might imagine, ludicrously difficult to enforce. I'm a student, I use a tv tuner card, and I sure as hell don't pay £130 or whatever it is per year. How exactly am I going to be forced to pay the license fee? I get threatening letters often (which is the primary tactic the license fee collection agency use to get people to pay up) but if a license inspector ever comes to my property and asks to come in to verify I don't own an operational tv tuner, I'll politely tell him to fsck off.
From there, the only way he can get access to my property is to get a warrant from a judge, based on zero evidence that I'm doing anything wrong. Good luck there.
The license fee collection agencry is an RIAA type agency that uses scare tactics and ignorance to collect its money. The only people who get fined tend to be relatively poor people who don't pay for a license but also don't realise that they have the legal right to refuse entry to a license inspector. An inspector calls round, demands to be let in, the person lets them in, shows them the tv, and they get a fine to the order of several thousand pounds.
The whole system is ludicrous, outdated and monstrously inefficient. We would be much better served if an independent body determined an appropriate level of funding for the BBC year-on-year, and the money came from general taxation.
Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)
I particularly like the one where they do a road trip from Miami to New Orleans and conclude that nobody should ever travel to America.
And I completely agree, and I'm an American.
Re:It's not a tax. It's not compulsory (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a tax AND a licence. And, like most taxes, it's compulsory for people who fulfil a certain criterion (in this case, owning a TV).
The only real difference is that the money doesn't go to the Government as you say, although this isn't that different to any other taxation money which the Government hands to private companies for services. The BBC still have the Government backing to be able to enforce it (clearly, no other TV company has the right to "licence" its services this way).
Advertising tax (Score:4, Insightful)
I think I'll stick with paying the BBC upfront.
BBC: "1. We're not part of a conspiracy." (Score:2, Insightful)
I guess that's the logical equivalent of those big, flashing "SELF-DESTRUCT" buttons evil villains always seem to have in their command centers.
As far as the constant response of "move along, nothing to see here" (in this case quite literally!), a metaphor from Ted Geisel describes it best:
"And what happened then...? Well...in Who-ville they say that the Grinch's small heart grew three sizes that day."
Re:Top Gear (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)
they do still do the motoring satisfaction survey, but one quiz a year on new cars is hardly investigative jounalism
Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)
Beckham is a poofter.
Besides, it wasn't just the slogans. They were threatened with a lawsuit for GIVING SOMEONE A CAR.
Re:Top Gear (Score:2, Insightful)
What does that have to do with the rest of the population of the United States?
In my travels, when I treat people with courtesy and respect, that's what I get back. Clarkson is constitutionally incapable of same (I'm pretty sure his enormous head would assplode), so people treat him like a dick. Which works, because he IS a dick. A sometimes-fairly-entertaining dick, but the man is a still a dick. May and Hammond hang around with him, so they get the same treatment.
(that may be the most times I've ever said dick at the same time. dick.)
YouTube + BBC = Nothing New (Score:3, Insightful)