Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses The Internet Television Media

BBC Strikes Deal With YouTube 156

twofish writes "Google's YouTube video site will soon be showing content from the BBC in a deal announced today. Auntie Beeb's content will be spread across three different channels, one for news and two for entertainment programmes. Content will include adverts, and clips from shows such as "Top Gear," "The Mighty Boosh," and nature shows narrated by David Attenborough. The deal is likely to be controversial, particularly since the BBC is paid for by a compulsory tax system (the license fee) rather than through advertising or subscription. The article goes on to say that they won't be 'hunting down' people that upload their content to YouTube. Just the same, they reserve the right to take down or remove programmes that have run on their channels which might damage relationships; examples might be football offerings or 'edited' shows."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

BBC Strikes Deal With YouTube

Comments Filter:
  • Adverts... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sheriff_p ( 138609 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @09:50AM (#18206034)
    Worth noting that in the UK, the BBC's "iPlayer" project which is currently being rolled out, will provide ad-free TV-over-IP on-demand for anyone with a UK IP address. Thus, just like BBC America, the BBC's adverts are the BBC's way of maximising the value they offer to the UK public, by getting foreigners to watch 'em.

    -sheriff
  • Finally (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jackharrer ( 972403 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @09:50AM (#18206036)
    Finally somebody got into their heads that quality of YouTube is crap and broadcasting programs there will work only as an advertisement. What's the point of suing them if you can work with them and have advertisement for free. If somebody likes their programmes they will watch them on telly anyway. Think about watching Attenborough's programs and thinking: "Are those 20 pixels a lion trying to catch an antilope (other 20 pixels)?"

    And for commercial stations that would be even better - they would be able to add some of advertising, or such.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 02, 2007 @09:51AM (#18206042)
    Not compulsory taxation. It's a subscription, it's just that you take out the subscription by owning a TV (or other device capable of receiving TV signals).
  • by Odiumjunkie ( 926074 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @09:58AM (#18206082) Journal
    >..is the perfect way to fund public goods, like information.

    It's not really a "compulsory" tax. You're obliged to pay the license fee if you own a television tuner set to recieve broadcast television stations.

    This is, as you might imagine, ludicrously difficult to enforce. I'm a student, I use a tv tuner card, and I sure as hell don't pay £130 or whatever it is per year. How exactly am I going to be forced to pay the license fee? I get threatening letters often (which is the primary tactic the license fee collection agency use to get people to pay up) but if a license inspector ever comes to my property and asks to come in to verify I don't own an operational tv tuner, I'll politely tell him to fsck off.

    From there, the only way he can get access to my property is to get a warrant from a judge, based on zero evidence that I'm doing anything wrong. Good luck there.

    The license fee collection agencry is an RIAA type agency that uses scare tactics and ignorance to collect its money. The only people who get fined tend to be relatively poor people who don't pay for a license but also don't realise that they have the legal right to refuse entry to a license inspector. An inspector calls round, demands to be let in, the person lets them in, shows them the tv, and they get a fine to the order of several thousand pounds.

    The whole system is ludicrous, outdated and monstrously inefficient. We would be much better served if an independent body determined an appropriate level of funding for the BBC year-on-year, and the money came from general taxation.
  • Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Paulrothrock ( 685079 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @10:09AM (#18206150) Homepage Journal

    I particularly like the one where they do a road trip from Miami to New Orleans and conclude that nobody should ever travel to America.

    And I completely agree, and I'm an American.

  • by mdwh2 ( 535323 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @10:27AM (#18206288) Journal
    That it's a "licence" doesn't mean it also isn't a tax. A tax doesn't have to be paid by everyone - there are many taxes which only have to be paid by some people. That's like saying income tax isn't compulsory because you don't have to have a job, or council tax isn't compulsory because you don't have to own a property...

    It's a tax AND a licence. And, like most taxes, it's compulsory for people who fulfil a certain criterion (in this case, owning a TV).

    The only real difference is that the money doesn't go to the Government as you say, although this isn't that different to any other taxation money which the Government hands to private companies for services. The BBC still have the Government backing to be able to enforce it (clearly, no other TV company has the right to "licence" its services this way).
  • Advertising tax (Score:4, Insightful)

    by oliverthered ( 187439 ) <oliverthered@nOSPAm.hotmail.com> on Friday March 02, 2007 @10:53AM (#18206564) Journal
    Just like the Advertising tax I pay (indirectly) to Rupert Murdoch every time I buy something from the shops. I I don't even own a satellite dish or read the sun.

    I think I'll stick with paying the BBC upfront.
  • by Eternal Vigilance ( 573501 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @11:41AM (#18207108)
    And we all know anyone part of a cabal evil beyond imagination would when asked be honor-bound to answer "Well...we are part of a conspiracy to overthrow the last vestiges of western democracy and enslave you and your descendants forever, yes."

    I guess that's the logical equivalent of those big, flashing "SELF-DESTRUCT" buttons evil villains always seem to have in their command centers.

    As far as the constant response of "move along, nothing to see here" (in this case quite literally!), a metaphor from Ted Geisel describes it best:

    And the Grinch grabbed the tree, and he started to shove
    When he heard a small sound like the coo of a dove.
    He turned around fast, and he saw a small Who!
    Little Cindy-Lou Who, who was not more than two.

    The Grinch had been caught by this little Who daughter
    Who'd got out of bed for a cup of cold water.
    She stared at the Grinch and said, "Santy Claus, why,
    "Why are you taking our Christmas tree? WHY?"

    But, you know, that old Grinch was so smart and so slick
    He thought up a lie, and he thought it up quick!
    "Why, my sweet little tot," the fake Santy Claus lied,
    "There's a light on this tree that won't light on one side.
    "So I'm taking it home to my workshop, my dear.
    "I'll fix it up there. Then I'll bring it back here."

    And his fib fooled the child. Then he patted her head
    And he got her a drink and he sent he to bed.
    And when Cindy-Lou Who went to bed with her cup,
    HE went to the chimney and stuffed the tree up!


    "And what happened then...? Well...in Who-ville they say that the Grinch's small heart grew three sizes that day."
  • Re:Top Gear (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Moofie ( 22272 ) <lee AT ringofsaturn DOT com> on Friday March 02, 2007 @11:44AM (#18207152) Homepage
    Right, because if you spray-painted "Beckham is a Poofter!" on your car and drove it through rough neighborhoods in Great Britain, they'd offer you tea.
  • Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Skrynesaver ( 994435 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @11:51AM (#18207238) Homepage
    To wander totally off topic for a moment, (as I am wont to do), Top Gear started out pretending to be public service broadcasting, you know the sort of thing, consumer advocacy. But Clarkson et. al. have turned it into a juvenile pissing contest. Yes it's fun to see articles on ridiculous cars such as the Evo and the Veyron but it needs more coverage of the real world. More on keeping a 15 year-old Toyota going (not difficult) and less on the relative styling merits of the latest unaffordable McLaren Mercedes V's the BMW Mid-Life Crisis.

    they do still do the motoring satisfaction survey, but one quiz a year on new cars is hardly investigative jounalism

  • Re:Top Gear (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Paulrothrock ( 685079 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @11:51AM (#18207258) Homepage Journal

    Beckham is a poofter.

    Besides, it wasn't just the slogans. They were threatened with a lawsuit for GIVING SOMEONE A CAR.

  • Re:Top Gear (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Moofie ( 22272 ) <lee AT ringofsaturn DOT com> on Friday March 02, 2007 @11:59AM (#18207354) Homepage
    Yep. That was, indeed, a dick move by a very sleazy lawyer.

    What does that have to do with the rest of the population of the United States?

    In my travels, when I treat people with courtesy and respect, that's what I get back. Clarkson is constitutionally incapable of same (I'm pretty sure his enormous head would assplode), so people treat him like a dick. Which works, because he IS a dick. A sometimes-fairly-entertaining dick, but the man is a still a dick. May and Hammond hang around with him, so they get the same treatment.

    (that may be the most times I've ever said dick at the same time. dick.)
  • by Kichigai Mentat ( 588759 ) on Friday March 02, 2007 @12:14PM (#18207558) Journal
    Beeb content has been showing up on Google Video for a while now, mostly because Google Video doesn't impose a 10 minute limit. And I personally like it because Google lets me download things for my iPod and PSP, which is especially nice when my laptop is doing some heavy lifting stuff. Hopefully Google will at least drag those features into YouTube.

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...