Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Seeing Color in the Night 166

Roland Piquepaille writes "In 'Things that show color in the night,' the Boston Globe reports that a company named Tenebraex is helping color blind people to travel. But it's also developing goggles to help soldiers and physicians to see all colors at night, and not only the green color of current night vision systems. These goggles, which should become available this summer, will be sold for about $6,000 to the Army. But as states one of the founders of the company, with monochrome night vision, 'blood is the same color as water.' So these expensive night vision devices might be more targeted to Army physicians than to regular soldiers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Seeing Color in the Night

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 26, 2007 @02:25PM (#18490819)

    I'm tired of this idiot and the way he copies other articles so the silly slashdot editors can direct traffic at his half assed blog and help him make some money. He's even more annoying than the proprietary Micheal Simms.

    Glass

  • by ScentCone ( 795499 ) on Monday March 26, 2007 @02:32PM (#18490905)
    There are some non-gun-toting people who need to operate in a stealthy or semi-stealthy manner that would make use of this sort of thing. Think of the National Geographic-types that are setting up a pre-dawn shoot and trying to remain less visible, or the guys working on a forward helicopter refueling station who definitely prefer to be harder to see and definitely want to know the difference between stepping in a puddle of water and a puddle of hydraulic fluid.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 26, 2007 @03:07PM (#18491375)

    In that case I propose a general rule - no links back to blogs of posters should be permitted. I have seen very many articles where people link to their blogs.

    Surely, this is about creating _generalised principles for proper behaviour, and moral imperatives for good governance of a discussion form_ as opposed to simply _doing what is possible to damage and ostracize an individual because you think he is an ass_? If the latter is the purpose then please enlighten the audience.
  • by gravesb ( 967413 ) on Monday March 26, 2007 @03:31PM (#18491667) Homepage
    Actually, as an infantry officer, I prefer the monocular. If you get whited-out, you still have one good eye. It takes a bit to get used to, but once you are used to it, the monocular is an excellent system.
  • by Grishnakh ( 216268 ) on Monday March 26, 2007 @03:49PM (#18491871)
    I'm "attacking" the Army by complaining how it doesn't adequately supply troops? Maybe I'm attacking the top brass that controls those things, but I don't think I'm attacking the Army as a whole, certainly not the soldiers who have to put up with doing battle without any armor, or having to accept substandard medical care.

    Ultimately, the blame for these things lies at the very top.

    And yes, I do bitch about my tax money being spent on the military: I can think of many better things to spend $1 TRILLION on than an unjustified war. A standing military for national defense is a good thing; starting wars in other countries for no good reason (and the consequential gigantic military expenditures) is not. If you disagree, I'm sure the Pentagon will happily accept your donations.
  • by Ed Avis ( 5917 ) <ed@membled.com> on Monday March 26, 2007 @04:16PM (#18492271) Homepage
    No. Ronald Piquepaille has mended his ways. The story links straight to the relevant article and not to his blog. The last few stories from him have done the same. It's time to declare victory and move on to some other gripe.
  • by Brad1138 ( 590148 ) * <brad1138@yahoo.com> on Monday March 26, 2007 @04:43PM (#18492709)
    This reminds me of a question my Grandfather posed to me when I was young (30+ yrs ago). When the lights are out, can you not see colors (objects) because it is dark or because they don't have any color w/o light shining on them, a bit like "does a tree falling make noise if no one is there to hear it". I haven't thought of this in a while, I am sure there is a scientific answer, I would guess the prior, the characteristics that make an object a certain color are still there when the lights are out.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 26, 2007 @05:27PM (#18493377)
    OOOOOOhhhhh saaayyyy can you seeee ... by the dawns early light.... That's right you punk ass commie bitches.... don't you ever question the government or the army!!!! You MUST be a TRUE PATRIOT like GigG and never question anything!! If the U.S. of A. says we're at war, you must shut down your brains to preserve patriotismness and fight the ENEMY. Complainin that the army didn't put enough armour on the humvees, or had crappy GPSs, or anything that might be deficient is unpatriotic and hurts our troops. We mustn't tell anyone that the soldiers might need better equipment as the ENEMY might find out. Like those evil general public who isn't smart enough for public debate. Something bad might happen like putting more armour on the humvees, or getinng better night vision goggles. Worst case, we might find out that this was a B.S. war to begin with, and thousands of good U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians died for Cheney's and Bush's personal cause. You know it GigG, exercising freedom of speech by questioning policy is very unpatriotic.
  • by cp.tar ( 871488 ) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday March 26, 2007 @05:39PM (#18493573) Journal

    Now, sorry for being blunt (i.e. trolling), but military equipment is expensive.
    Suckers who volunteer to fight in wars are a dime a dozen.

    I mean, nobody pays people to reproduce, but they do it anyway, eh? The more you kill, the more will spawn.

    (Why, yes, I am a mizanthrope.)

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...