Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Networking Government The Internet IT Politics

India To Offer Free Broadband by 2009 245

codecracker007 writes "The Government of India is planning to introduce free 2 mbps broadband for all residents of the Indian subcontinent by 2009. The expected service shall be launched by the government owned telecom operators BSNL and MTNL. Quoting from the article: 'The government proposes to offer all citizens of India free, high-speed broadband connectivity by 2009, through the state-owned telecom service providers BSNL and MTNL. While consumers would cheer, the move holds the potential to kill the telecom business as we know it.' The India Times has an extensive editorial on the decision. It must be mentioned that the Indian government and its autonomous regulatory bodies are very proactive in holding the consumer interests above the operators', managing to reduce the long distance and wireless tariffs by a up to factor of 20 in less than 7 years."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

India To Offer Free Broadband by 2009

Comments Filter:
  • More Outsourcing? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by OakLEE ( 91103 ) on Friday April 27, 2007 @10:43AM (#18900327)
    The article raises a few issues. The first of which is what level of connectivity are we talking about? Does "access" mean a line to every home, or just access to a line by every household. The former would be a boon to all citizens (especially those living in tenement slums). The latter isn't as impressive as one could establish this by having access to one computer in each village.

    I think the greater issue, however, is the potential boon this might be to companies looking to outsource operations. One of the driving forces behind outsourcing is the penetration of cheap telecom into emerging markets. Here, you'd have a situation where companies wouldn't even need to pay for internet access to hire workers. They could just have them telecommute from home. If that's the case the amount of outsourcing could increase rapidly. It's a smart decision by the Indian government, as their investment would pay off ten fold if that were case. For the American engineer, though, this is perhaps not such a good development.
  • by arun_s ( 877518 ) on Friday April 27, 2007 @10:49AM (#18900419) Homepage Journal
    If they go through with this, it'll be really cool. Maybe, before that, just one small change would make me really happy. I have a 'broadband' conncetion right now, and the speed is a blazing 256 kbps. That's because that's what our Department of Telecommunications has defined [dot.gov.in] the minimum speed to be, for an ISP to call its service as a broadband connection. Disappointing, somewhat.
    Btw 256 kbps is also the maximum they're offering in my area in my city, I can't even upgrade if I want to.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 27, 2007 @10:52AM (#18900475)
    For any company that sets up offices in India, bypassing the public telecom system is job 1. When you see a picture of big-wig executives showing off their snazzy India facility, see if you can spot the satellite uplink on the roof. Believe me, it's there.


    My former employer built an office in India. The prices we were quoted for internet bandwidth were roughly 8X what we paid in the US. In the end, we settled for a quarter of T1 speed for about double the US price. In exchange for all of this, the throughput sucked. Packet latency and loss were simply miserable. The parent article's quote about "...regulators are very proactive in holding the consumer interests above the operators" is total BS as far as I'm concerned.


    Power is free in India, which leads to overconsumption and underinvestment in the power grid. Politically, free power is untouchable, yet there is no money available to make it reliable. Anyone who truly needs power learns to generate their own on-site. The same holds true for bandwidth -- bring your own.

  • by Dazza ( 2865 ) on Friday April 27, 2007 @11:12AM (#18900783)
    Just having a wander through the streets of Delhi makes you realise how daft this idea of offering every citizen broadband is.

    I was having a conversation recently with a well educated, wealthy, middle class Indian lady. She was telling me how high the average Indian wage was now. I was staggered at the figure she quoted, which, upon some questioning didn't include anyone not 'middle class'. Or, in other words, most of the country.

    Something tells me this is the type of person who decided it would be offered to 'every citizen', for a suitable definition of 'every citizen'

    There's a huge shortage of landlines for a start, which help the mobile boom ( again, for the middle classes ) and can be seen in the vast number of STD/ISD booths all over Delhi.

    And this is just Delhi. Are they going to cable up Srinagar or Jammu in the next couple of years ? somehow I doubt it.

    It's a laudable aim, but a dose of realism is needed I think
  • Rubbish! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mateo_LeFou ( 859634 ) on Friday April 27, 2007 @11:19AM (#18900891) Homepage
    You have NO IDEA what the costs of running a broadband network are! You left out
    -My $1.4 million salary [newnetworks.com]
    -$2 - $7 million/yr in campaign contributions [opensecrets.org]
    -Dozens of attorneys to sue Vonage out of existence
    ...and a bunch of things I'm not allowed to talk about
    Mateo LeFou, CEO, Verizon/AT&T
  • Re:Subsidized (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 27, 2007 @11:23AM (#18900937)
    Reading comprehension for teh win!!

    You might want to give that another shot...

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...