Vonage and Verizon — Prepare for Round 2 49
According to the New York Times, Vonage is preparing to take it's case back down to the lower courts for a retrial of the lawsuit against them from Verizon. Their hope is that with newer approaches set forth by the supreme court that the lower courts will be able to decide whether Verizon's patent(s) are ordinary/obvious or deserve patent protection. I wonder if this time it will be more obvious to the courts that Verizon's patents aren't so original?
Ordinary and obvious? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This is great news (Score:2, Interesting)
Even if they crash at the end of the summer, I'll have only paid $30/mo for a good phone system. I call that a good deal.
Re:At the end of the day (Score:3, Interesting)
JPEG, WMV, and most other codecs mostly do minor adaptations to compression techniques that have been around since the 1960s, and as such, should have very few valid patents (despite the huge number of patents that have been granted in these areas).
Codecs are also a good example of when interoperability should trump patentability. IMHO, data formats and the means needed to convert data formats to a standard format should not be protected under any body of intellectual property law (including patents), as this leads inevitably to vendor lock-in. In other words, decompressing technology should be legal to implement under all circumstances without any license.