MySpace Agrees to Share Sex Offender Data 297
mikesd81 writes "The Seattle Times is reporting that MySpace will be providing a number of state attorney generals with data on registered sex offenders who use their site. Attorney generals from eight states demanded last week that the company provide data on how many registered sex offenders are using the site and where they live. MySpace obtained the data from Sentinel Tech Holding Corp., which the company partnered with in December to build a database with information on sex offenders. Attorneys general in North Carolina, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania asked for the Sentinel data last week."
Correction for the anal (Score:5, Informative)
General is an adjective, not the noun. You pluralize the noun not the adjective.
Before Cletus gets his rope... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/terms/i
Theoretically, you have to be trying to 'assualt' someone by exposing yourself. Of course any DA with an agenda can make certain charges stick with a plea-bargain deal, even when they might not otherwise be applicable.
How many people can afford to hire lawyers necessary to try to defend themselves in such a case? If you do try to fight it, I hope you've got a damn good Public Defender.
Age verification.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Bullshit. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Privacy (Score:5, Informative)
Oral sex is illegal in: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia and Washington D.C. (OK, I admit, I got great head in MN)
An erection that shows through a man's clothing is illegal in: Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington D.C. and Wisconsin. (Lock me up for pretty much every time I had to read to the class in French classes during my teens)
In Missouri sexually deviant behavior between people of the same sex is classified as a class A misdemeanor.
In Willowdale, Oregon it is against the law for a husband to talk to dirty in his wife's ear during sex.
In Washington State there is a law against having sex with a virgin under any circumstances (including the wedding night!).
Newcastle, Wyoming it is illegal to have sex in a butcher shop's meat freezer.
In Washington D.C. there is a law against having sex in any position other than face to face.
Source [sfsu.edu]
I say lock the dirty bastards up and throw away the key!
Or, alternatively, accept that demonising people for being sexual deviants, without classification as to the act, is complete b.s.
More homogeneous feelings (Score:4, Informative)
From the Bureau of Justice [usdoj.gov]:
To me, these statistics do not indicate an "incredibly high" recidivism rate. Sure, sex offenders are more likely than non-sex offenders to commit a sex offense, but if 2.5% recidivism is high enough to justify lifetime tracking, then 1.2% (for murder!) is as well.
Re:Really mixed feelings (Score:1, Informative)
Sex offenders statistically have the LOWEST recidivism rates of ALL offenders. Go look it up, it's been shown time and time again.
This fact is inconvenient for various persecutions and pogroms so people choose to ignore it.
You've bought into the media frenzy. Check your facts before you post next time.
Re:Correction for the anal (Score:2, Informative)
No, because that would completely change the meaning of the sentence. Adding the apostrophe and then an "s" makes the word 'attorney' be possessive. Therefore, you are turning 'general' back into a noun, and saying that the attorney possesses the general.
The GP is right; the correct format would be "State Attorneys General." As he stated, 'General' is an adjective that modifies 'State Attorneys.' It's a little-used style of notation, so that's why it may seem foreign to read it that way. It's almost the same as if you were to write it like, "State Attorneys (General)."
Bleargh...Twitch...ATTORNEYS GENERAL!!! (Score:4, Informative)
That and "son of a bitches." Bah. It's SONS OF A BITCH or SONS OF BITCHES (depending on the number of dogs involved). Our science isn't advanced enough to generate one son from more than one female dog, damn it!
This could be interesting. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Age verification? (Score:4, Informative)
That is a defense in American statutory law, but not in practice. There are any number of outlets where anyone of any age with a sufficient amount of cash may buy a Visa gift card. [allaccessgift.com] I once sent an 8 year old to do it and he came back to me with a legally-purchased, fully working card I used to buy a subscription to a porn site.
Indeed, Visa specifically prohibits using a Visa card number as an age verification mechanism in their Rules for Merchants [visa.com]:
"The merchant must not use the account number for age verification or any purpose other than payment."
(Approximately 60% of adult industry transactions carried our by credit card on the net are carried out with Visa cards.) cite [ccbill.com]
Even if Visa permitted such a use, the merchant fees make it unworkable: Visa charges a percentage of every transaction, and the acquiring bank charges a fee as well, generally anything from a quarter to a dollar per transaction, PLUS a percentage, ranging anywhere from 2.3% to 15% of the ticket price, depending on a lot of factors they won't tell you about. This means that it simply isn't economical to use credit cards as a verification mechanism: It costs the merchant too much. To make a credit card transaction pay for itself, the merchant must make enough profit on the transaction to cover the fee, and if there's no fee, there's no profit one can use to cover the cost of the transaction, so it's a money-losing proposition.
So, right now, there is no way to effectively prove age, either adult or minor, on the internet. None.
How are they determining who the sex offenders are (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Correction for the anal (Score:3, Informative)
You mean like: keys, abbeys, monkeys, valleys, jockeys, surveys, turkeys, trolleys ...
Re:Call me an idiot... (Score:1, Informative)
Illinois for example only requires a 10 year term on the list as long as you're not a repeat offender.