Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Communications

Nortel Strong-Arms Open Source Vendor Fonality 143

leecidivo alerts us to Tom Keating's blog, where he writes about how Nortel forced a former subsidiary to return its open source-based phone system (Fonality) after the subsidiary went public with how happy they are with the Fonality phone system compared to Nortel. Quoting: "What happens when a VoIP blog (yours truly) writes about the fact that a former Nortel subsidiary (Blade Network Technologies) went looking for a new phone system, chose an open-source Asterisk-based solution from Fonality instead of using Nortel's own PBX and then agreed to go on record on the VoIP & Gadgets blog about why they made such a shocking decision? A) Nothing — it's a VoIP blog — who cares? Nortel is an $11 billion dollar company that certainly doesn't read blogs for their news. B) Nortel reads the blog post, is a little peeved, but other than some emails sent internally, no one outside Nortel would ever know they were annoyed. C) A Nortel Board Member flips out over the article, contacts Blade and then pressures Blade to return the Fonality system and have Fonality print a retraction to the blog article (and the subsequent press release)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nortel Strong-Arms Open Source Vendor Fonality

Comments Filter:
  • by L. VeGas ( 580015 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @06:01PM (#19228687) Homepage Journal
    What happens when an article is posted in the form of an overly long rhetorical question with confusing formatting and mutiple choice answers where the third option is presumed to be the correct answer? A) Slashdot readers, being generally fairly intelligent and thorough readers, react with good humor and are amused by the clever presentation. B) People reading the summary are somewhat confused and are forced to read it again to understand what is being said. C) A snarky post is made that light-heartedly mocks the original poster.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @07:29PM (#19229811)

    Hopefully Chinese farmers will, so they'll die like my two dogs did from their food.
    Is this a new take on the "In Soviet Russia" meme? Usually dogs die because the chinese use them as food. "In Maoist China, dogs eat chinese."
  • Retraction? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Rixel ( 131146 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @07:55PM (#19230137)
    "have Fonality print a retraction to the blog article (and the subsequent press release)."

    Nortel wants some other company to do a restatement?

    That's rich. :)

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...