What's Next For Google News 59
Stony Stevenson writes in with a Computerworld interview with a Google product manager talking about what's coming up for Google News, such as the possible addition of a video component and closer cooperation with YouTube. "One of Google's most popular and controversial services, Google News, is the aggregation and search site that media companies love to hate because it has become a major source of Web traffic and frustrations for many of them.... 'In an ideal world, Google News would show you who broke the story and the other articles that built on that. There are places where we're not doing that perfectly today.'"
EPIC (Score:5, Insightful)
Quality over quantity (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Good and Bad (Score:4, Insightful)
Thanks, but.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Wont kudos override accuracy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Its bad enough with 24h news networks trying to out do each other - this can only make it worse. Why not rank in terms of the reliability of the source. (How one measures that is, of course, a bit of a problem...)
Re:Good and Bad (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Good and Bad (Score:5, Insightful)
There are different news sources for different purposes, and each one requires a different degree of verifiability.
I knew a guy who edited an electronic newsletter for metals traders. In their business, they have a saying, "buy on rumor, sell on fact." They wanted rumors, and they wanted them immediately. They were paying $1,000 a year subscription for that privilege.
If you happen to be living in New Orleans, and the weather station finds out about a hurricane headed your way, you might want to know about that immediately rather than wait for the White House to verify the facts.
OTOH when I read about the potential dangers of a new drug that millions of people may be taking http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMe078
I also expect that when the President of the U.S. gives us reasons why we should go to war, the newspapers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller_(journ
There's plenty of news sources that do that. http://pulitzer.org/ [pulitzer.org] http://pulitzer.org/cgi-bin/year.pl?1979,16 [pulitzer.org] If you don't like the news you see on Google, be a little bit more selective in what you read.
I think readers have a certain responsibility to learn how to think. As the New Scientist suggested last week, people who know how to think will turn the argument around and look at it from the other guy's perspective. It's not fair to complain about the news media just because the stories report facts you don't agree with. If you did agree with them all the time, they wouldn't be doing their job -- which is to give your preconceived notions a kick in the ass sometimes.
Re:Good and Bad (Score:2, Insightful)
Pretty please? You're not that naive, right?