After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad 774
mrcgran writes "Sys-Con has a look at some advantages of using Ubuntu over Windows. 'My recent switch to a single-boot Ubuntu setup on my Thinkpad T60 simply floors me on a regular basis. Most recently it's had to do with the experience of maintaining the software. Fresh from a very long Windows 2000 experience and a four-month Windows XP experience along with a long-time Linux sys admin role puts me in a great position to assess Ubuntu. Three prior attempts over the years at using Linux as my daily desktop OS had me primed for failure. Well, Ubuntu takes Linux where I've long hoped it would go — easy to use, reliable, dependable, great applications too but more on that later. It has some elegance to it — bet you never heard that about a Linux desktop before.'"
wow, what a popup! (Score:3, Informative)
Popup / flash / whatever alert (Score:5, Informative)
Print version (Score:4, Informative)
Oh no... here we go again... (Score:2, Informative)
Flamebait I say
Print Version (Score:0, Informative)
Re:Popup / flash / whatever alert (Score:1, Informative)
Oh and the publishers (Sys-con) of this article suck.
more evidence (Score:3, Informative)
Symantec? (Score:5, Informative)
Ever try removing Norton from a system? It's like pulling wisdom teeth!
I understand that virus protection wasn't the main focus of the article, but he did make reference to it, and in the defense of Windows and giving the article a bit more of a balanced test, the testers should at least make sure they are using good 3rd party products.
h
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:4, Informative)
The List (Score:5, Informative)
Whenever these discussions come up, I like to forestall some of the repetition by posting my list of wins for OS X, Windows, and Linux. This is a list of the things each OS does better than some others, not a list of problems. Feel free to post and suggest other items, but please know what you;re talking about. I hate getting posts from people who clearly have never used two of the OS's in question and are simply assuming their favorite OS must do it better.
OS X Wins:
Windows Vista Wins:
Ubuntu Fonts (Score:3, Informative)
P.S. One thing I missed from the Windows world was a simple RPN calculator like XCalc.
Re:Differing Opinion (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Differing Opinion (Score:3, Informative)
Your example is neither complicated (correct), or intuitive (incorrect).
Somebody stopping by and playing with Linux will probably have *no* clue what the etc direcotry is, or even to look there. And then telling them what it is for (everyone I have heard has described it as "configuration settings"), they would never guess to *look* there for starting and stopping applications, they would probably look in the
This is especially true (Score:5, Informative)
--E-Mail: Check. Linux has Thunderbird, which is what I use under Windows.
--Web: Check. Again, same thing as I'd use under Windows (Firefox).
--SSH: Check. Maybe the command line SSH client isn't quite as pretty, but it works in ever way as well.
--Remote Desktop: Check. Not as slick as the Windows one, but doesn't lack for anything important.
--Text editor: Check. I like UltraEdit better, but there are plenty that work fine for Linux.
--Ability to map SMB and/or NFS shares: Check.
That's pretty much it for the major tools I need. So long as I can check on the problems that need solving, and get to the servers that they need solving on, that's all my system needs to do for that part of the job. Linux does that just fine. Hell, so does Solaris.
However that doesn't carry over to other areas necessarily. A good example of where it doesn't is media production. The tools for Linux are sub par at best in my experience. In theory it might be possible to do what I need, but in practice I have never been able to figure out how and it is just too much effort. For Windows I just install Sony Vegas and go, it makes everything easy. In Linux it is fighting with many different tools, some of which are quite hard to get compiled (no binary distribution) none of which seem to be able to do everything that is needed.
So picking an area that Linux is strongest at isn't necessarily that useful, especially when talking Linux on the desktop. I mean I've known sysadmins that use Solaris as their desktop OS, doesn't mean that anyone would suggest it is intended for prime time desktop usage. Also, sysadmins are (or at least should be) more able to deal with some of the problems you'll encounter. Dropping to a command line it something a sysadmin should be able to do. A normal user? Not so much. If it isn't pointy and clicky with everything spelled out, it may be past their competence.
Re:Ubuntu Fonts (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Kubuntu 7.04 (feisty) ppc (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Kubuntu 7.04 (feisty) ppc (Score:2, Informative)
For Gnome users (ubuntu) Digikam isn't so great because it is KDE related software and Gnome apps dont know how to use KIO slaves so well, thats why gnome users should try F-spot first.
Re:Nice pitch, but... (Score:5, Informative)
I have to call you on that latter point.
His point was that you don't need crappy vendor-supplied restore solutions with Ubuntu because install CDs can be easily obtained for free.
After suffering a total hard drive failure, I tried to obtain a factory-restore CD from IBM (this was before they sold the PC business to Lenovo). They told me I couldn't have one without paying because *Microsoft* forbids them from giving them away.
I think his point is fair and legitimate.
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:4, Informative)
don't you rsync as root? (Score:3, Informative)
Surely you jest!
I've used rsync for backups for years. I back up my mail, my Thunderbird data, and "my document" directory (i.e., /home/xxxx/). One of these backup commands looks like this and sits in a single shell script and runs from cron once a day (I've already sent the ssh key to the backup target server so no need to manually login to the backup server for this command to run):
/home/xxxx/.mozilla-thunderbird/ root@mycomcastipnumber:/hdb/ibmt60-ubuntu-mozilla- tbird/ >> /home/xxxx/backup-.txt
rsync -avgz
I'm sure plenty of linux admins promote the use of both rsync as a backup/restore mechanism and the use of the root login over the internet! They all happen to be 13, but still...
Doesn't happen in Opera 9.21.8776! (Score:2, Informative)
I am doing the following:
1.) Using its built-in popup blocker
2.) Combining that with
3.) Combining THAT even moreso w/ filtering custom css stuff I use
4.) Not allowing JAVA or JavaScript in my webbrowsers on the public internet (some sites I have to make exception to, Opera allows this though, by site in its rightclick on a page "EDIT SITE PREFERENCES" popup menu options)
5.) Disallowing FLASH via registry hacks to the Win32 OS I use (Windows Server 2003 SP #2, FULLY hardened, per this URL -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=237507&cid
6.) & lastly, a custom adbanner blocking HOSTS file (referred to in the URL above)!
(In regards to the latter - I have one built up from years of doing this on my own & lately, from http://stopbadware.org/ [stopbadware.org] , & that has over 90,000 sites in it, as of today that could be banners that suck up my bandwidth, OR WORSE, deliver me "Mal-Content" (pun intended, because this has been shown to be the case sometimes, yes, believe-it-or-not, in adbanners having code that is malicious in them the past 2-4 years now, & articles here on
Anyhow, sorry webmasters of the planet - I am a HUGE fan of HOSTS files that block banners, because of the above, & the fact it's MY MONEY I spend to go online, & I want ALL OF MY POSSIBLE BANDWIDTH!
APK
Re:What is Ubuntu? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:wow, what a popup! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Nice pitch, but... (Score:3, Informative)
Also, to get rid of the video (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:2, Informative)
I have to call you on *your* latter point (Score:2, Informative)
As for not being able to give out the disks later, as a replacement? Wrongo! Again, that's OEM policy, not Microsoft's.
Blame the OEM for the crappy recovery process and lack of disks, not Microsoft.
Re:The List (Score:3, Informative)
linux wins:
* can run efficiently on cheap, out of date x86 machines
* g++ and lots of developer tools pre-installed by most distros
* out of the box can scale to 64 CPU's. some kernel tweaks and IBM uses it as a supercomputer OS with thousands of nodes.
* wide variety of virtualization solutions, many of them completely free
windows wins:
* easier to control large number of machines in a corporate environment
* support techs are cheaper to employ
* games, games, games
mac wins:
* the higher initial price is offset by longer hardware and OS lifetime (5 year old mac's still have significant resale value)
Re:wow, what a popup! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:wow, what a popup! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I'm very impressed with Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
It all comes down to hardware support in the form of firmwares and drivers. Unfortunately, there's not much Ubuntu can do about that, since most hardware manufacturers don't care even a little about their OSS using customers.
So if you want to blame someone, don't blame the Ubuntu team. They're doing the best they can with that they've got.