Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds 505
WED Fan writes "A University of Washington researcher who couldn't find funds the old fashioned way has raised funds from private parties to continue with his studies of 'time travel'. He is studying the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Basically, using spooky action, he wants to be able to use entangled pairs to send messages, not only through space, but also in time. 'As the evidence for this has accumulated, several fairly contorted and unsatisfying efforts have been aimed at solving the puzzle. Cramer has proposed an explanation that doesn't violate the speed of light but does kind of mess with the traditional concept of time.' Despite the implausibility of the science here laypeople have been inspired by the researcher's idea, enough to donate almost $35,000 to his project."
obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
I have a bridge that...
In soviet Russia Time Travel You.
Is this the Lt. Commander Data theory or the Spock theory of time travel?
if you do manage to do this, send me a copy of all the sports results for the next 100 years and history of the stocks, etc.
Seriously.. If this was possible, i can only start to imagine how the wrong people or even the right people could really mess up things with their first little test.
Its not that far fetched. (Score:5, Funny)
I invested some money in this guy next week and have been earning a decent return on my investment for the last 3 years.
I did however feel a little shiver as I considered shorting his stock and for some damned reason pictures of my family have started to fade.
So? (Score:5, Funny)
he wants to be able to use entangled pairs to send messages, not only through space, but also in time.
Big deal, Slashdot has been bringing us news from the past for years!
As The Doctor once said... (Score:5, Funny)
First Post from 1972 (Score:5, Funny)
Come on... (Score:4, Funny)
I am already Half way there. (Score:5, Funny)
Push it to the limit (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Its not that far fetched. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:5, Funny)
>:-*-D
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:5, Funny)
RIAA Funded (Score:2, Funny)
Oh no! This must be a conspiracy to allow RIAA hit-men to go back into time and take out the Internet before it was born.
Re:obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re:First Post from 1972 (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe they did... (Score:5, Funny)
How do you know they didn't?
Sure, it may seem like it's a foolish investment, but if it pays off... Oh, man... Invest a penny at the beginning at time, and before you know it, you'll be dining at Milliways.
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:1, Funny)
Dude you forgot 2s complement.
Re:First Post from 1972 (Score:3, Funny)
I am an investor. (Score:5, Funny)
I have yet to hear of any results, although I did have a strange experience the other day. I was about to try my first sip of Milo's Famous Sweet Tea when a 500 lb man appeared from thin air and knocked the glass from my hand before disappearing again.
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:3, Funny)
Ok, it doesn't work as intended, but it compiles, so hell, ship it!
Re:for chists sake (Score:5, Funny)
Re:obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re:As The Doctor once said... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:ROI (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Its not that far fetched. (Score:5, Funny)
2. ???
3. Invent Time Machine
Dear God! (Score:5, Funny)
Now THAT would be annoying! Imagine turning the thing on for the first time ever, and immediately receiving Zetabytes of "Frist psot!" messages.
Re:I wanna see this technology at the network laye (Score:2, Funny)
64 bytes from 192.168.65.24: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=-20.84 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.65.24: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=-21.33 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.65.24: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=-19.43 ms
----science.slashdot.org PING Statistics----
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = -23.45/-21.26/-19.43 ms
myserver:/home/idontgno > ping science.slashdot.org
PING science.slashdot.org (66.35.250.150): 56 data bytes
Re:obligatory (Score:3, Funny)
So, how do you weed through the noise? How do you know what pair to listen to when you don't even know a message has been sent?
Weaponize this sucker, grab an intangled pair in a critical system, like a reactor, twist the sucker until it does something bad. Boom, Three Mile Island goes into shut down because an Iranian...oh, wait.
Turn this into an industrial sabotage device, grab an intangled pair from a critical processor, twist the sucker, Intel turns out faulty math co-processors in the mid-90's...oh, wait.
Blimps...New Jersey...oh, wait.
Re:Two counterpoints (Score:5, Funny)
Cue pissed off insulted caveman Geico commercial.
-
Re:So? (Score:5, Funny)
Not hard for those with superior intellect (Score:3, Funny)
Pffft...everyone knows that really intelligent people [youtube.com]have already figured this out.
Re:Two counterpoints (Score:5, Funny)
I am writing to inform you that I have recieved a message from your future self. Included is the text from that message.
Here's my address..
Yes, but look at the bright side... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So? (Score:3, Funny)
Oddly enough, most of the articles from the future are also from the past...
Re:ROI (Score:3, Funny)
Who knew Chicago had it right all these years; I really do no longer know what time it is.
Re:obligatory (Score:3, Funny)
You still make money in the many world interpretation. Though trading on a sport event might not be your best bet, By having a view of the future you can sell or invest in right technologies etc, this is robust enough not to be affected by small changes.
Making money in Many Worlds is easy, even without time travel. Suppose you want to bet on who will win the World Series. Get some quantum bits, and decide beforehand on what (orthogonal) states of those qubits correspond to which teams. Prepare a superposition of all 30 possible teams. Now, measure your state, and bet all your money on whichever team your measurement tells you. Wait for the world series to finish, then either collect all your winnings, or, if you didn't win, kill yourself.
In all worlds where you're still alive, you'll have won a lot of money.
Note to theoretical computer scientists: this is very similar to how someone (who believes in Many Worlds) might try to compute the answer to a problem in the complexity class Post-BQP [caltech.edu].
Note to everyone else: don't try this at home.
Re:Not hard for those with superior intellect (Score:0, Funny)
Re:I am already Half way there. (Score:4, Funny)
2038 (Score:2, Funny)