US GPS, EU Galileo to Work Together 203
saintory writes "The US and EU are in talks to allow their separate GPS systems to work together. The future uses would allow enhanced location information based on two readings, among other benefits. 'The market probably will drive dual-use receivers. We think probably that single (U.S.) GPS-specific, or Galileo-specific receivers — the market will phase out in time [...] It just doesn't make sense to limit yourself to just one system'."
How very... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I don't know about Galileo, but GPS needs help (Score:3, Insightful)
and besides - how does adding additional signals to your already shitty location change anything? If you've got bad multipath problems or narrow FOV problems, more satellites isn't going to change anything.
One system (Score:2, Insightful)
No, what we need is like 500 different systems. Just like in the world of memory cards.
Don't ask me (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm just reporting what's been in the news. I definitely wasn't say it was a good idea - I was just trying to clarify the context around it.
OTOH, playing devil's advocate, a missile shield would (theoretically) stop missiles coming from a terrorist group were they to acquire one. It would presumably not be meant to stand alone but rather be part of an entire well thought out system (stop giggling). You could scan for dirty bombs at the border, have great devices for detecting pathogens, make your airline passengers fly naked, but none of that will stop a missile coming towards your country any more than a missile shield would prevent the discreet release of poisons into the drinking water.
The truth is all in the numbers (Score:2, Insightful)
It's a military decision... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I love posts like yours, being small must suck (Score:2, Insightful)
Military use (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How does this qualify as news? (Score:3, Insightful)
1. GIOVE-A, the first Galileo test satellite, was launched on 28 December 2005 from Baikonur Cosmodrome. It transmitted its (not it's) first navigation signal on 12 January 2006 and began transmitting complete navigation messages (i.e. with ephemeris and clock performance data) on 2nd May this year. No Frigidaire (just a commercially available satellite bus), no amateur radio (although SSTL, who built GIOVE-A, got their start building amateur radio satellites at the University of Surrey), two rubidium frequency standards (but no metronome), no baling wire (or bailing wire, either) and definitely no Weird Al.
2. Nobody has hacked any Galileo encryption. They have deduced the previously unspecified content of the signals transmitted by GIOVE-A and made out like they had discovered some big secret. The Cornell GPS lab deduced the PRN codes used by GIOVE-A - which were not secret, just not widely distributed. When the time comes, the two Galileo Public Regulated Service navigation signals will have their ranging codes and data encrypted - and no teenagers will be able to hack them - just like nobody has ever hacked the P(Y)-codes on GPS. In any case, the encryption keys will be replaceable in-service.
3. The agreement doesn't call for the US to rely on Europe. It calls for the systems to be interoperable so that, when they are both functioning, user can get quicker and more accurate fixes by having more satellites visible. Galileo will offer better performance at higher latitudes - won't someone think of the Alaskans?
Europe didn't kill Concorde. British Airways and Air France killed Concorde because it became unprofitable after a modification programme made necessary mainly by an accident caused by a piece of metal that fell off of an American airliner.
Airbus may yet get to eat Boeing's lunch - let's wait for the outcome of the Dreamliner/AB380 death match.
Your only (partially) valid criticism: it turned out that the industrial consortium that was supposed to build Galileo couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery, let alone take responsibility for a major space infrastructure project. Most likely, the European Space Agency will act as procurement agent for the system, which will then be operated by someone sensible, like Inmarsat.
Who's the tosser now?
Re:I thought the whole point.... (Score:2, Insightful)
"They are way too old, the GPS satellites (at least, most of them)."
Well, which is better: older working models or wonderful new technology that doesn't really exist yet?
EU Galileo Satellites in orbit: 1 of 30 (see also: Vaporware)
US GPS System: 30 known broadcasting satellites. (Some sources suggest that there are other 'dark' GPS satellites that are already orbiting 'in reserve' to backup the system as a failsafe in case of disaster or hostile action.)
I think the Galileo system sounds wonderful, but then again, so do flying cars. I'm not holding my breath waiting for either one.
Re:How very... (Score:1, Insightful)
Oh. Pity you don't live in a democracy or anything so you could change it.
power (Score:3, Insightful)
If they could somehow make the two systems act as one, and you could read a channel from one system with no extra power cost, then I agree that getting a fix from best available satellites and mixing-an-matching during the process is superior to limiting yourself to one system.