Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Windows Operating Systems Software Bug Microsoft IT

Windows Genuine Advantage Servers Out 300

krewemaynard writes to let us know that Microsoft has been having major problems with its WGA servers since at least Friday evening. Quoting Ars: "Users of both Windows XP and Windows Vista were writing to say that they could not validate their installations using WGA, and one user even said that his installation was invalidated by the service... The Microsoft WGA Forums are full of problem reports, and Microsoft WGA Program Manager Phil Liu has acknowledged that there is a problem, and that MS is investigating." Update: 07/25 22:10 GMT by KD :Microsoft has identified and fixed the problem and posted instructions for anyone whose system mistakenly failed a WGA check. (The link posted earlier was to a 2006 article.)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Windows Genuine Advantage Servers Out

Comments Filter:
  • by ivoras ( 455934 ) <ivoras AT fer DOT hr> on Saturday August 25, 2007 @03:29PM (#20355497) Homepage
    A friend of mine was immediately reminded of the Fight Club movie - how they tried to blow up all the banks at the end so nobody would owe anybody anything. Imagine if some digital vigilante wiped out Microsoft's database of keys, maybe like an inside job... all installs everywhere would simply be invalidated in an instant :) Now *that* would be a strong and immediate demonstration of both how the whole "activation" thing and DRM are wrong.

    Man can dream...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 25, 2007 @03:35PM (#20355543)
    is that they're calling the people that sell their software thieves. They are biting the hands that feed them. One of our customers bought a copy at Fry's, and when they called Microsoft about the problem, Microsoft accused Fry's of selling pirated software. Accusing the people that make money for you is a good way to kill a business.
  • Repay the compliment (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jeevesbond ( 1066726 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @03:57PM (#20355737) Homepage

    Microsoft frequently shill online forums, they're even attacking the venerable ISO! From this Groklaw article [groklaw.net]:

    And if it were me, I'd want to know if there is any Microsoft shadow in the background. Someone placed a threatening comment on Groklaw the other day, saying someday the "darkness" behind PJ would be revealed, and to "sleep well", and because of the threatening tone, I checked the logs and the comment appears to have come from an ad agency that does a lot of work for Microsoft. So I am wondering about things I didn't think about before. I remember what happened to an innocent man's reputation in the Massachusetts ODF affair.

    So, this would seem like the ideal time to feed them some of their own medicine. Get over to the WGA forums [microsoft.com] and do some pro GNU+Linux astroturfing. Here was my message:

    I came here not because I have a problem but because the mainstream media is starting to pick up on this issue, I suspect that pressure on MS to fix the problem will tremendously increase once this hits a few news/social networking sites.

    The reason I'm not having any issues? I use Ubuntu and have the pleasure of knowing my OS and computer are owned by me. Maybe a few people here should give it a try: you never know, it might work! If it doesn't, all you've wasted are a couple of hours when you couldn't use Vista anyway.

    Either way, I hope these problems get fixed for you guys soon.

    As long as you're polite and make a point it can only help the adoption of Free software. Show these people that we're not zealots and offer them a way out of the WGA doldrums! :)

  • Microsoft fanboi (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ctid ( 449118 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:09PM (#20355827) Homepage
    JohninTN's contribution to that forum is just funny. He seems to think that people should just "calm down" when the functionality that they have paid (rather a lot of money) for suddenly doesn't work because of some MS boneheadedness. His attitude in this thread [microsoft.com] is quite amazing, in my opinion.

  • Re:WGA sucks (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jeevesbond ( 1066726 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:11PM (#20355845) Homepage

    It will work out of the box and you won't have to spend hours recompiling the kernel etc. to get it to work

    Are you just horribly mis-informed, joking, trolling or shilling? The missus and I have been using GNU+Linux on our laptops, desktops and servers (2 laptops, 2 desktops, 1 home server and one dedicated web server) and have never compiled the Linux kernel. The only times I've ever bothered compiling anything is if I want cutting-edge, not-even-released-yet software, and what's wrong with that?

    Funny, I was starting to think that there would be a single day on Slashdot without an anti-Microsoft story.

    Here's a deal for you: when there is a single day where Microsoft don't cock things up, shill standards organsations or act as an abusive monopoly then there will be a single day on Slashdot without an anti-Microsoft story.

  • true story (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Kristoph ( 242780 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:22PM (#20355907)
    I actually had this happen to me:

    - A Vista installation at a company I work with 'invalidated'.
    - I called Microsoft.
    - A person named Josh, who had quite an Indian accent as well as a speech impediment answered and after MUCH effort I provided the information required. (Please note I have the greatest respect for people of Indian decent as well as people with speech impediments but you can, I am sure, appreciate how this makes communication difficult.)
    - A few minutes later he came back on and said that 'Microsoft is currently having computer problem' and please can I call back later.

    In fairness, 2 days later the machine automatically revalidated but the whole thing was rather comedic.

    ]{
  • Re:WGA sucks (Score:3, Interesting)

    by aichpvee ( 631243 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:24PM (#20355923) Journal
    They'd just be creating a market for knockoff dongles. A real solution (for microsoft) would be to just accept the shitloads of cash they're making and stop thinking that they need to act like assholes when they're not rolling around in huge piles of it.

    For the rest of us there's always the real solution of just not using it. It's been working out pretty well for me.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:29PM (#20355959)
    I never install copy protected software, since I feel that it validates my right to use the software that I have paid for.
    If i was buying the software on a lease/maintenance agreement, things might be different, but Windows is VERY expensive, and rather poor quality. I know of no other server OS that needs frequent reboots to correct weird slowdowns, and strange resource leaks.
    I am just glad that I switched to Linux when Microsoft went down the product activation route with Windows XP. They cleary think that their customers are criminals, and i'm sure most of their customers have a similar opinion of Microsoft for delivering substandard products and exercising criminally monopolistic practices.
    Good ridance Microsoft. I don't miss you.
  • Re:WGA sucks (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Computershack ( 1143409 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:45PM (#20356149)

    The only times I've ever bothered compiling anything is if I want cutting-edge, not-even-released-yet software, and what's wrong with that?

    It's 2007. I use cutting edge software on Windows, to the point of daily builds. Never needed to compile one yet.

  • by flyingfsck ( 986395 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:47PM (#20356175)
    Hmm, it also wasted at least two hours of my time when I tried to install a new system and activation would not work. I traced through countless routers before I finally figured that it must Microsoft that is a fault and not our firewalls - so I installed a hack. Thank god for The Pirate Bay...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:52PM (#20356243)
    Not a problem. Found a legit copy on eBay I could afford. Installed that over the pirated version. Not a problem.

    Downloaded and installed the WWDC beta of 10.5. Not a problem.

    Are we seeing a pattern here?

    DRM, copy protection, vendor lock in, Genuine Advantage, Sony's rootkit fetish.

    NONE of them work.

    And when something like this which affects millions of legitimate users happens, what is end result that gives MS reason to ensure it doesn't happen again?

    You go and buy their latest OS AGAIN!

    Seriously, how many times are you going to let yourselves be fucked over by MS, before you switch to Linux or Mac or just sodding file class action suits against the bastards?

    In Soviet Russia, YOU fuck over Operating System monopolies!
  • by gelfling ( 6534 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @04:58PM (#20356303) Homepage Journal
    A court agreeing with Microsoft that you do not own your own computer you merely license it.
  • by jbn-o ( 555068 ) <mail@digitalcitizen.info> on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:10PM (#20356417) Homepage
    Framing this issue around inconvenience misses the more important underlying point. Your freedom to control your stuff matters. This incident is a harbinger of bad things; ostensibly Microsoft is trying to prevent illicit use yet chiefly adversely affects legal users. A system which denies users the freedom to control their data, their computer, and (as more of their life is conducted on their computer) their lives.
  • by Bearhouse ( 1034238 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:10PM (#20356419)
    Do you mean 'wrong' as in 'immoral', or 'wrong' as in 'does not work'?

    Personally, I think it's both.

    Like many people here, (I imagine), I change hardware frequently, and am also cursed with being my neighbours', friends', childrens' software and hardware support. So I get this 'activation' bs regularly. Have you ever tried fixing a system that was delivered with a 'recovery' CD, that tries to access some (corrupt) partition etc...of course, no 'original' installation CDs

    How long before you cut your losses and install from one of your 'corp.' CDs, or - if it's not in the family - download some streamlined thing from isohunt? Believe me, its 10x quicker than going the ms way. Shit, it's not even as if they or I did not BUY the software in the first place... Anybody want a load of VALID ms serials - you can have 'em...

    The real problem is that 'activation' punishes the honest user, whilst doing little or nothing to stop the pirates... /end rant.

  • by SeaFox ( 739806 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:33PM (#20356619)
    Isn't it interesting that the government doesn't consider systems like WGA a threat to national security?

    The dangers of software monoculture are well known, now combine that with an authentication system the government has no control over. Once the entire Windows desktop marketshare (+90% of all desktops) is using a Windows OS featuring WGA, what's to stop criminals and terrorists from capturing the datacenters that house these servers and holding a major factor in world finance hostage?
  • by tji ( 74570 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:48PM (#20356731)
    I didn't realize WGA did periodic (constant?) checks on the system validity. I thought it was just a one-time check at installation (like entering the product ID on Win2K). That's hilarious that you can pay MS hundreds of dollar for the software, only to have it crippled when they screw up and accuse you of being a thief.

    Why do people use that crap?
  • by Nullav ( 1053766 ) <moc@noSPAM.liamg.valluN> on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:52PM (#20356777)

    It's good that you haven't needed to compile a program because Windows doesn't come with a compiler.

    A person who won't compile a program has no advantage over a person who can't.
    By that logic, someone with Ubuntu can't compile anything, because it doesn't come with a compiler. All someone on Windows needs to do is install MinGW/Cygwin. Hell, you could just install an IDE like Eclipse (and the required plug-ins)/Codeblocks/VC++ and be done with it there.
  • Re:WGA sucks (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Ajehals ( 947354 ) on Saturday August 25, 2007 @05:53PM (#20356789) Journal

    Makes me wish you could still pick up a pci video card for $5 at places.
    It cant be just me who has a shelf full of pci video cards. Or maybe I should start throwing legacy kit out (my current laptop is a 500Mhz Dell, simply because its little, light and just keeps going - 2 batteries give me 5-6 hours of usage, and there are two bays...) but I just cant bear to get rid of stiff that could be useful to me or someone else...

    Hell the pile of semi working laptops I have sat here very from a powerbook 100 (still works) through a dell latitude ( I think a 166 Mhz processor) through to a High end HP laptop with a busted screen (runs headless).

    But as for PCI video cards, they always come in handy, like whenever I feel the need to add another monitor to my desktop - I was up to 4 for a while but the S3 card I used on monitor 4 was less than worthless at 800x600, (I'm back to a 15" a 19" and a 21" all on different cards, one of which is AGP). In fact on top of a stack of pci video cards I also seem to have a pile of 15" LG monitors that have been retired..

    Forgot the point of the post now, but I haven't had a coffee since 6 so its probably OK.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 25, 2007 @08:01PM (#20357635)
    Close. Now try rephrasing it with a slightly different logic.

    Suppose the government (US and allies) wants to keep, or be able to achieve when needed, control of people computers, say being able to put spyware, get access to user files, shut down machines etc, what requirements would the system have to allow this?

    1: It needs to be produced by a single company with strong ties to the government(s).

    2: It must employ methods to allow remote access of user files and system resources.

    3: It must be closed source, and people exposed to the source code must be closely monitored.

    4: It must be as widely used as possible, in order to discourage the use of alternatives. Giving it away installed on new PCs by default and closing one or both eyes when dealing with piracy will help to spread it.

    On other words, Windows fits perfectly the requirements of the most obiquitous system of global public surveillance ever conceived.

    Now back to your post, WGA isn't considered a threat to national security because WGA is a brick of the national security building.

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...