Comparing Visual Studio and Eclipse 294
An anonymous reader writes "Getting started with Eclipse can be confusing. New concepts, such as plug-in architecture, workspace-centric project structure, and automatic build can seem counterintuitive at first. Without waxing too philosophical about IDE design, this article presents the main differences between Visual Studio and the Eclipse IDE."
Eclipse vs Visual (Score:5, Funny)
Now, to get the folks that can add studio into the equation....
Re:Eclipse vs Visual (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I beleive the technical term is (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Question (Score:2, Funny)
The latest 2005 editions even come with a set of custom options for configuring your resource hogging.
The flashing file save icon has been redesigned and now displays as an alpha blended bead of annoyance.
Re:That's not a comparation !! (Score:5, Funny)
It's more like Introduction to Eclipse for Visual Studio developers.
Re:That's not a comparation !! (Score:4, Funny)
Well, it's only the Slashdot summary that's misleading, then.
Re:I beleive the technical term is (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Eclipse isn't really an IDE anymore (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Plugins make Eclipse what it is (Score:5, Funny)
Why does your boss hate you?
Re:NetBeans (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Plugins make Eclipse what it is (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Plugins make Eclipse what it is (Score:3, Funny)
Re:That's not a comparation !! (Score:3, Funny)
I haven't used it, but it should be pointed out that Eclipse is now so big that it's also used for a lot of stupid reasons -- that it's used for $foo doesn't prove that it's a good fit for $foo, or for anything else.
I used to be in a project where we used Visual Studio 6. In reality, it sucked, so I wrote all my code in Emacs.