Amiga Inc. Reveals Further Info About Amiga OS5 260
Amiga Gamer writes "Amiga Inc. Acting President Bill McEwen has given an update to Amiga OS5 of sorts. In a previous interview Bill had said of OS5: "The product that we are going to ship is going to be much better than OSX from Apple". "OS 5 is ahead of schedule, and we will be making public announcements concerning the product in the 4th quarter of this year.""
Who cares? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hell, IBM resurrecting OS/2 would make more sense.
Summary of the interview: (Score:5, Insightful)
Robert
The best new feature would be... (Score:5, Insightful)
So far, AmigaOS 4 is a bit like OS X being built for special hardware, just that this one lacks the hardware.
I can understand if Apple doesn't want to let go of OS X like that, because they after all sell a lot of hardware this way, but isn't AmigaOS 4 is in such a horribly sorry state that Amiga Inc would only win on having it support other hardware platforms better?
Re:Sales of the new Amiga... (Score:3, Insightful)
Amiga.......good old days... (Score:4, Insightful)
Then, I upgraded to a 2000 and the 8mhz CPU just wasn't enough. I had to upgrade it with a 68030 running at *gasp* 25mhz and wow things were great. I ran a 2 phone line BBS (using C-net) with my prized USRobotics HST modem and a regular 2400 baud on the other line. Sure, it was a warez bbs but wow those were some great memories! I could multitask the BBS (with 2 users uploading/downloading/posting), write my homework using Scribble!(a wordprocessor), print my homework and have Monkey Island running at full speed while printing. No slowdown. It was amazing at the time, esp. compared to Windows (3.11? Or 3.0? Not sure, barely remember those things then).
The full screen program multitasking, which let you pull up and down a full screened program like slides, was quite amazing and powerful. The games, the sounds, all amazing. Of course, this is compared to AdLib soundcards and CGA/EGA. At the time, there was no reason to "game" with your dad's expensive PC other than the fact that it was "all that is available at home."
But now? C'mon! I soon had to let go of my Amiga when no further developments came along. When Doom came out for the PC along with Wing Commander, Strike Commander, etc., the Amiga just started to look antiquated. Sure, the multitasking element was nice, but it just lost the gaming advantage when no advances in the graphics department were forthcoming. There was just so much potential but the management just took the potential and threw it down the drain. The only graphics update I got was a
Anyway, sorry for the nostalgia. Back to topic: Workbench (the Amiga OS) 3 looks about Windows 3.1 level still, maybe a bit better. It's pathetic. I don't know about Workbench 4 and good lord how could a BRAND NEW market untested and long development dormant OS be better than OSx? C'mon! That's like creating a new model of the DeLorean and saying "This is better than a Ferrari. Trust me!"
More progress with AROS? (Score:4, Insightful)
Sounds like the AROS Project is making more progress than Amiga Inc. is.
Re:All 5 amiga users jumped for joy until (Score:2, Insightful)
The AROS project looks promising but doesn't work with my hardware and this would be just the thing to move them forward.
I was just about to mention AROS until I saw you did
To be honest, despite AROS's limitations, I'd have thought that it's far along enough that the original source code wouldn't help them much - after all, the original source code only runs on either 68k or PPC.
The whole Amiga bankruptcy scene was a comedy of horrors and the new Amiga, Inc. is the twisted punchline.
I agree, it's sad really, it would have been nice to have more choice in computing today, as opposed to just Windows or still-not-ready-for-the-desktop-Linux, or niche-player Apple (which many of us just don't like). It's especially insulting as the companies that did most damage were PC companies - Escom and Gateway - and the way it seems to damage the image of the Amiga (at least on Slashdot). Imagine if a PC company bought Apple, then raised all the prices, and hardly ever bought out new models? Would that mean Macs are crap after all? Of course not.
Hell, rather than trying to build a new platform from scratch, I think I'd find it more pleasing for someone to just release some decent modern PCs, with WinUAE installed as standard, and branded Amiga (I mean, they'll be just as close to the Amigas of 10-15 years ago, as modern Macs are to Macs of the 90s...) Then people can happily run 4GB quad-core machines and smugly call them Amigas if they so wish