A Google Blunder- the Sad Story of Urchin 164
Anenome writes "Google has a track record of buying startups and integrating them into its portfolio. But sometimes those acquisitions go terribly wrong, as Ars Technica argues has been the case with Google's 2005 purchase of web-analytics firm Urchin Software Corp. 'In the wake of Google's purchase of the company, inquiring customers (including Ars Technica) were told that support and updates would continue. Companies that had purchased support contracts were expecting version 6 any day, including Ars. What really happened is this: Google focused its attention on Google Analytics, put all updates to Urchin's other products on the back burner, and rolled out a skeleton support team. Everyone who forked over for upgrades via a support contract never got them, even though things weren't supposed to have changed. The support experience has been awful. Since the acquisition, we have had two major issues with Urchin, and neither issue was solved by Google's support team. In fact, with one issue, we were helped up until the point it got difficult, and then the help vanished. The support team literally just stopped responding.'"
Two sides to every story (Score:2, Insightful)
Breach. (Score:3, Insightful)
It looked to me that they signed a contract. Therefore, wouldn't it be breach of contract and be actionable in court?
Uncertainty (Score:5, Insightful)
FOSS losers (Score:5, Insightful)
It makes one wonder how many of these companies eschewed open-source solutions, in favor of expensive "supported" software.
Hopefully enough of these examples will eventually reach the tipping point where PHBs will finally begin to wonder what exactly they're getting for their money.
Re:Buyouts (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I blame Microsoft (Score:4, Insightful)
Ok, I'll bite...
Price doesn't have to be the only basis for competition. You can compete on service, and quality of product as well. To make an analogy, look at the retail market. Walmart competes on price, and its pretty successful. Target, knowing that it can't beat Walmart on price, competes by having brighter stores, and higher quality goods. Recently, Target has had a higher growth rate than Walmart, indicating that atmosphere and quality are criteria used by consumers to evaluate stores.
Similarly, you don't have to compete on price with Microsoft, and if you do, you'll probably lose. The trick is to go for quality and service - something that Google has been going for, except in this case. That's why the continued disregard of existing Urchin customers was a blunder - it put a black mark against Google's reputation for good customer service.
Re:Honestly, who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)
Sue! (Score:2, Insightful)
Are they finally evil? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Uncertainty (Score:3, Insightful)
This.
Not that Google doesn't realize this, but they dropped the ball in this case. We have a few major systems being rolled out at the University, and the faculty web tools have sporadic uptimes. Fastest way to have faculty NOT use your tools? Have the system be down just ONCE when they want to use it. "It never works!" is what you'll get and they'll do it themselves from there on out.
Re:What it really shows (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Just goes to show... (Score:3, Insightful)
What did you expect (Score:2, Insightful)
-aggles
Gone wrong? (Score:2, Insightful)
Not a new story (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone remember Dodgeball.com [dodgeball.com]? Google bought 'em when they were hot, everyone expected great things, check out their founder's resignation letter [flickr.com].
Google is competitive, outside and inside. If a product doesn't have a strong voice, strong support, it'll get starved. There are lots of examples of this, where Google (or Yahoo or any other company) buys a smaller company and it's products just kinda evaporate.
Sometimes it is truly a mismatch in cultures. Other times the folks coming in get sucked into 'more interesting' projects and their original ones languish. Once in a while the goal of buying the company was to shut it down, or at least to deny it's benefits to a competitor.
Whatever the case whenever a buyout happens smart folks immediately put together transition plans, if only contingency ones.
In my career I've had CA buy and rape/pillage/burn (not always in that order!) any number of products we've depended upon. Yahoo! also has a record of ingesting, partially digesting, then eventually burping up a barely recognizable (and rarely for the better) version of the original service. Same for Amazon - anyone else recall Firefly, PlanetAll, A9 with street-views, etc.?
Urchin is just one more example of why committing to a product or service that isn't it's owner's primary interest is a risky gamble. Never assume the status quo; companies & priorities change and that's how inattentive customers get caught out.
Re:Why PHB's go with commercial services (Score:1, Insightful)
Oh, I understand all right. To some degree, it is CYA maneuvering. But once you peer beneath the veneer of "support" what are you really getting? Urchin is a good example because it is a fancy web-log reporting tool. Not necessarily beyond the capabilities of a few internal developers, or other existing tools in the OSS world.
See, this is exactly the kind of problem with Career Management attitudes today. You yourself indicated that your final solution is to spend more money lawyering up, and even more money on an 'alternate' solution. The only real rationale for the purchase is to have someone else to yell at.
And PHBs keep getting away with it, because nobody seems to call them out on all the money they waste on empty promises and vaporware.
Security issue with Urchin!! (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem is thus:
1. The ordering screen where you enter your VISA card number is loaded over https
2. The ordering screen includes the urchin.js [google-analytics.com] script file, but this file is loaded over unsecured http
3. This means that urchin.js could be replaced in transit with another script which could steal your personal info by, for instance, changing the form you are submitting to point to another server.
In this case, the Firefox "lock" icon displays an error: "Warning: Contains unauthenticated content". Unfortunately, this is very easy to miss. I only spotted it because I use the Petname Toolbar [mozilla.org], which prevents phishing and spoofing. The toolbar would not let me set a petname for this site, because the unsecured content could literally change anything on the page, so it wasn't safe. If you don't already have the Petname Toolbar installed, I highly recommend that you install it.
Urchin could close this hole if they allowed urchin.js to be loaded over https, but the file isn't available over a secured link. To anyone using urchin.js, make sure you don't include that file on your secured pages.
What's even more disheartening, is that this site was verified as "hacker safe" by ScanAlert [scanalert.com]; missing such an obvious hole really decreases my confidence in their testing methods.
Re:Superior free software support (Score:3, Insightful)
This even goes for proprietary derivates of BSD licensed open codebases; FreeBSD has gotten a ton of stuff (e.g, the SCSI stack, the netgraph stack) from proprietary derivates.
Eivind.
Re:Superior free software support (Score:1, Insightful)