Mozilla to Develop Mobile Firefox 152
Kelson writes "Mozilla has announced a new initiative to bring Mozilla to the mobile web, including a fully functional mobile version of Firefox (yes, with extensions). The focus will be part of Mozilla 2, the big revision coming after Gecko 1.9 and Firefox 3. Minimo, the previous attempt to port Mozilla to mobile platforms, is apparently dead, but 'has already provided us with valuable information about how Gecko operates in mobile environments, has helped us reduce footprint, and has given us a platform for initial experimentation in user experience.'"
it's a pattern of behaviour (Score:5, Funny)
The thing I like about Firefox, is it's something people can really embrace, and extend.
Re:it's a pattern of behaviour (Score:2, Funny)
Re:By the time.... (Score:3, Funny)
Wow! Someone who actually read the article!
Google Phone (Score:5, Funny)
Odd item in Related Links (Score:4, Funny)
"Let's see, you can get it from this site for $0. But this one is offering it for $0. Or you could go over here and get it for $0, but they charge $0 for shipping. Hmm, I think I'll go with the place selling it for $29.95."
A new name? (Score:3, Funny)
MObile FirefOx
Then, we can abbreviate that to Mofo.
Re:A new name? (Score:3, Funny)
Peer into the future (Score:2, Funny)
First slashdot post:
"Liar Liar pants on..."
"Was he running FireFox?"
-
Re:A new name? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What is with the Mozilla naming conventions? (Score:1, Funny)
Simple.
Reduced memory footprint?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Reduced footprint (Score:4, Funny)
My Precccccciooooouuuuuuusssss?
Re:Why have 23 flavors when you can't do vanilla? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:come on now (Score:3, Funny)
Details page: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/microsoftprograms/iemobile.mspx [microsoft.com].
It's ultra basic. No popup support, no Flash, no