Australians Running On-Line Poll Based Senators 293
exeme writes "The 2007 Australian election was recently announced and a new completely on-line based political party is running for election to the Australian Senate. Senator On-Line will give Australian residents eligible to vote a chance to vote in on-line polls for every piece of legislation that comes to the Senate. The senator will then blindly vote in accordance with the majority.
The party has no position on anything until it is voted on and has been approved by the Australian Electoral Commission as a legitimate party. The party will be running two candidates in each Australian state." I imagine this could have a huge impact on CowboyNeal related legislation down under.
Re:Interesting approach (Score:2, Informative)
http://senatoronline.com.au/faq [senatoronline.com.au]
2. Who can vote on each Bill or Issue?
Every person recorded on the Australian Electoral roll is entitled to join SOL, without any membership fees, as a 'poll member'.
Re:Nice one... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Interesting approach (Score:3, Informative)
This is not new and definitely not a new step in democracy - if anything it's a step backwards from the representative democracies we have now to direct democracies the Athenians (I think) had when they invented the entire thing ages ago.
Re:Depends on definition of majority (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Digital Divide (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Nice one... (Score:1, Informative)
No, I think you need to clear up your vocabulary.
Your definition of democracy is correct.
What you call a "republic" is actually "representative democracy [wikipedia.org]". A representative democracy is where we elect people to vote on bills for us instead of us voting on everything.
The real definition of "republic [wikipedia.org]" is an entity where the head of state is not a monarch and the people have input into their government.
wtf mate? (Score:3, Informative)
Here's a better title:
New Australian Party Backs Internet Opinion-poll Driven Candidates
Now, internet aside, how is that any different from business as usual?
Re:Nice one... (Score:3, Informative)
A Democracy can be direct, as you describe, or representative, as the US and every one of significant size is.
A Republic is a nation whose head of state is not a monarch; a useful distinction a few hundred years ago, not so much today.
Re:Democracy? (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/Party_Registration/Registered_parties/sol.htm [aec.gov.au]
http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/02%2F377+ASIC+accepts+enforceable+undertaking+from+Mr+Berge+Der+Sarkissian?openDocument [asic.gov.au]
Australian Senate != US Senate (Score:4, Informative)
Most of the time it works pretty well(though the current government is sort of suffering quite a bit because in the last election they took the senate too and there's no one there to buffer their own stupidity), but it's not composed of the same sorts of people as the US Senate and an on-line senator would fit in pretty well there.
Add the fact that most politicians tend to just vote the way of the polls anyway.