Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Media Movies Security

'I Was a Hacker for the MPAA' 385

Wired has up an article with a man named Robert Anderson, who was recruited by the MPAA in 2005 to inform on people in the BitTorrent community. In a tell-all interview with the site, Anderson explains how the powerful media organization encouraged him to obtain the information they were looking for: "According to Anderson, the MPAA told him: 'We would need somebody like you. We would give you a nice paying job, a house, a car, anything you needed.... if you save Hollywood for us you can become rich and powerful.' In 2005, the MPAA paid Anderson $15,000 for inside information about TorrentSpy -- information at the heart of a copyright-infringement lawsuit brought by the MPAA against TorrentSpy of Los Angeles. The material is also the subject of a wiretapping countersuit against the MPAA brought by TorrentSpy's founder, Justin Bunnell, who alleges the information was obtained illegally."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

'I Was a Hacker for the MPAA'

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 22, 2007 @07:09AM (#21070339)
    After reading about crap like this, I'm happy that I no longer consume the shit spewed forth by the mass media. Just over two years ago I sold my TV and DVD player, gave away the DVDs and CDs I had to relatives and friends. Since then I haven't watched TV, watched a movie (on disc or in the theater), listened to mainstream music, or otherwise involved myself with their product.

    Instead of buying mainstream CDs, I go listen to local bands play at a variety of pubs and other venues, and buy directly from them if I like what I hear. The local theater productions are often far better than the latest Bruce Willis shitflick out of Hollywood. Instead of watching TV, I go biking, rockclimbing, and I also play recreational badminton.

    So I'm glad to say that my funding of this sort of bullshit has been minimal, if at all. I urge more people to take a path similar to the one that I've chosen. You'll be far better off, both in terms of the entertainment you do experience, the money you save, and the fact that you're not funding the mainstream media in any way.

  • Re:obligatory (Score:5, Interesting)

    by im just cannonfodder ( 1089055 ) on Monday October 22, 2007 @07:39AM (#21070501) Homepage
    This maybe a silly question but isn't hacking illegal in the usa as part of GW,Bush's anti terror laws? If this is the case shouldn't the mpaa members all now be under investigation by the cia/fbi?
  • by Fuzzypig ( 631915 ) on Monday October 22, 2007 @07:56AM (#21070587)
    Biggest pile of Elephant wank I have ever seen! "If you hack TorrentSpy", "you can have anything you wish for", so here's a measly $15k! If he was tasked with saving a multi-billion dollar industry on his own, surely they could have a a quick whip-round at the MPAA directors meetings and probably raise 10x that in small change!!! Hacing TorrentSpy??!! WTF!? Hardly rocket science is it, its a publicly open web-server pushing out glorified text files telling you where file sharers are sharing copyrihted material! A few pokes about on WhoIs, the odd phone call here and there, leaving the IP collector on a few weeks on a few very popular torrents, work out the ISPs of those sharers and Bob's your Auntie's Live-In Lover, bish-bosh-zoom $500k please!

    I'm sorry, but this smacks of FUD from the MPAA/RIAA bullshit, brain-storm meeting! How can we scare off casual "pirates"? I know, says bow-tied twat number 1, lets make up shit about professional hackers gathering your details and bringing down the fabric of society, or at least one of the 75 popular torrent sites.

  • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) on Monday October 22, 2007 @08:04AM (#21070633)
    So an association of businesses used legal methods to protect their legal and legitimate income stream.

          Mr. Coward, please tell me why I can't:

    a) watch a DVD that I purchased legally on my television via the TV-Out port on my video card, using my computer's DVD drive to read this legal DVD? Macrovision prevents that. There are ways around it, but they are illegal due to the DMCA.

    b) watch a DVD that I purchased legally in linux, because apparently Hollywood hasn't bothered to write an official DVD-decoder for that operating system, yet they maintain that if anyone else does it, it's a DMCA violation?

  • Re:obligatory (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MadJo ( 674225 ) on Monday October 22, 2007 @09:49AM (#21071469) Homepage Journal
    Geez, lay off the caffeine next time.

    "Hacking" or "to hack" has many different meanings already. (The term was not invented by those 'hackers', and will not be the sole property of said hackers.
    Google and Xerox don't like it when their name is used as a verb, but it still happens. If you don't believe me, then google it.)

    Merriam Webster defines "hack [m-w.com]" as follows:

    Main Entry:

    Pronunciation:
            \hak\
    Function:
            verb
    Etymology:
            Middle English hakken, from Old English -haccian; akin to Old High German hacchn to hack, Old English hc hook
    Date:
            13th century

    transitive verb
    1 a: to cut or sever with repeated irregular or unskillful blows
    b: to cut or shape by or as if by crude or ruthless strokes
    c: annoy, vex --often used with off
    2: to clear or make by or as if by cutting away vegetation
    3 a: to manage successfully
    b: tolerate

    intransitive verb
    1 a: to make chopping strokes or blows ; also : to make cuts as if by chopping
    b: to play inexpert golf
    2: to cough in a short dry manner
    3: loaf --usually used with around
    4 a: to write computer programs for enjoyment
    b: to gain access to a computer illegally


    Yes, the term is being muddied by the media, but language is always in flux, meanings change. New words appear. Perhaps it's time to give the 'white hat' hackers a new term? Or start using the term 'white hat' more.
  • Re:obligatory (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sconeu ( 64226 ) on Monday October 22, 2007 @11:22AM (#21072603) Homepage Journal
    Come on... it's only illegal if "ordinary people" do it. If $BIG_CORP does it, it's a patriotic act to catch those Evil Content Pirates(tm).

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a bipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer

Working...