Congressman Tells Comcast, Hands Off BitTorrent 304
An anonymous reader writes "Just a few months back, the Net Neutrality debate was all but dead. Luckily for fans of a free Internet, the telcos are their own worst enemies. Recent stories involving Verizon Wireless blocking pro-choice groups, AT&T censoring Pearl Jam's anti-war comments from a streaming concert, and most recently, Comcast finally admitting to using anti-BitTorrent filters. The Net Neutrality debate would appear to be alive and kicking, with Congressman Rick Boucher (D-VA) being the first politician to make a public statement sharply criticizing Comcast's actions."
Re:Nice glasses (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Sigh (Score:5, Informative)
Completely blocking an entire protocol isn't QoS, Qos is about giving priority to certain types of traffic that need lower latency or more bandwidth, an example would be VoIP which needs low latency to not become useless.
What Comcast has been doing is outright blocking an entire protocol, sort of like how some ISPs block their users' ability to use SMTP, mostly outbound but in some cases inbound as well. The difference being that there is a good reason to block outbound SMTP, it may be a PITA for those trying to run their own mail server but at least the reason isn't so much direct greed as it is to protect the network at large from zombie machines trying to spam the rest of the net...
/Mikael
Re:Nice glasses (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Sigh (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Great start (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Simple soulation (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Comcast Tesll Congressman: We Own Your Colleagu (Score:3, Informative)
oligarchy: a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
from: http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=oligarchy [merriam-webster.com]
What is being missed in all this (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Comcast Tesll Congressman: We Own Your Colleagu (Score:5, Informative)
That is why F.C.C. rules should be changed to ban paid-for political ads on radio, tv, satellite and cable.
They should bring back the old rules where broadcasters commit on their license/renewal applications to a minimum amount of public affairs programming (which could included free political time) and limits on the maximum number of commercial minutesper hour. Broadcasters could pick their own numbers, but could be at a disadvantage at renewal time if a competing applicant wants to do more to serve the community.
What I suggest is not a restriction on free speech, only a restriction on what broadcasters can accept payment for.
Most of the corruption we see with our politicians relates to them selling out to obtain money for campaigns. Eliminating money from the picture for radio and tv would certainly lessen the need to raise money for campaigns.
We should go back to earlier much more restrictive rules on how many stations a licensee could own. I think we should go beyond that and require that some specified percentage (perhaps increasing over time) of stations in a region have licensees that live in the city-grade coverage area of their station. Having local licensees would go a long ways towards making broadcasters more responsive to serving the needs of their local communities.
Having a free and diverse press and broadcasters and a free flow of information is essential for democracy to function properly. We should not allow any corporate or special interest groups to own a sizeable chunk of our broadcast stations. These stations are supposed to be trustees of the public interest, not just cash cows for large companies.
Re:Comcast seems to be fast (Score:1, Informative)
Or maybe that I've downloaded 2.0GB and only managed to upload 6MB?
Re:Sigh (Score:2, Informative)
You can always price out a T2 instead of complaining about your cable service so you don't have an oversold pipe. Of course, you don't want to pay full price for the level of service that you want, you expect all those web surfing dolts to subsidize you.
Lest you think I'm just some cable apologizer, I don't like the advertising either. When I first got my cable modem, the advertising was "up to 10 Mbit/s" while the modems were capped at 2Mbit/s. It took 6 or 7 years to finally get the level of service I was sold. I just think you're being hypocritical for bitching they should block one service while leaving your pet service unthrottled and then complaining you aren't getting your money's worth when your monthly payment only covers a fraction of the cost of the full bandwidth you want.
habeas corpus (Score:3, Informative)
There are currently limitations on habeas corpus for aliens, not citizens.
The GP is right and you're wrong on this. All the Bush admin feels it needs to do is call someone an enemy combatant [consortiumnews.com]. This admin denied the US citizen Jose Padilla habeas corpus. CATO has called this a Dangerous Precedent [cato.org].
Falcon