BSA Software Piracy Fight Smacks of RIAA Crackdown 282
Ron Paul Dennis Kucinich writes "A Business Software Alliance raid on musical-instrument maker Ernie Ball Inc. cost the company $90,000 in a settlement. Soon after, Microsoft sent other businesses in the region around Ball's a flyer offering discounts on software licenses, along with a reminder not to wind up like Ernie Ball. Enraged, CEO Sterling Ball vowed never to use Microsoft software again, even if 'we have to buy 10,000 abacuses.' Similar BSA raids around the country have been provoking strong reactions from put-upon business owners, echoing similar reactions to music-lovers targeted by the RIAA."
10,000 abacuses? How about 10,000 Linux installs? (Score:2, Informative)
Also, I have a lot of respect for Ernie Ball products; their guitar strings are my favorite. I'm relating this story to my local LUG. They deserve some respect for publicly denouncing MS.
Dupe (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The solution is simple (Score:5, Informative)
Seriously, this is old.
Re:Actually, you want to kill BSA/RIAA?? (Score:1, Informative)
2002 News? Really? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What ever happened to that saying (Score:1, Informative)
that's from memory...
i wonder how many machines were loaded with that key.
Re:Dupe (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Authority for raids? (Score:5, Informative)
BSA: "We have reliable evidence from a confidential source [read: disgruntled (ex-)employee] that you don't have valid licenses to the software you use."
Company: "You don't have any authority over us. GTFO."
BSA: "Fine."
[BSA starts suit against company, submits evidence to a judge, and during the discovery period requests complete documentation of all software being run on company systems, along with licenses and date of purchase. If company fails to provide, BSA files for a motion to compel or some such legal mumbo-jumbo that basically gives the BSA the judge-approved legal right to take apart every computer and really ruin their day.]
BSA: "According to what we found, it appears you're liable for tens of millions of dollars of damages according to current copyright fines."
Company: "Err... gosh, maybe we overlooked purchasing a few hundred software licenses here and there. Our bad. Say, do you have any kind of compliance deal for companies like ours who accidentally used unlicensed software on every computer we own and where we don't have to admit guilt?"
BSA: "Sure, just fork over $90,000 on top of paying our legal bills and purchasing licenses for all that software we discovered, you admit no wrongdoing, but you also agree to annual audits from here on."
Company: "Yeah, again, our bad... hey, who should we make this payable to?"
[Company makes the payment, BSA cashes it, company buys licenses to all software, and BSA files motion to dismiss suit.]
Re:Missing sales recipts = piracy (Score:3, Informative)
At the same time, did you insist on a copy of the sales reciept?
The BSA is considering copies with certificates of authenticity as sketchy if they are missing the sales reciepts. At home, anything off warranty is missing the sales reciept. The news of the BSA audits is definately encouraging me to go 100% legit. I have a machine that came with Windows that was given to me brand new. I don't have a reciept. It is currently dual boot, but the next hard drive replacement won't include the bundled software.
The software license for some software is licensed for installation on only one PC. The license for some other software is licensed for any PC you or your family has, and may be freely copied and given away as long as you comply with the requirements of the license, such as providing a copy of the source code.
Guess which software license I prefer.
Re:The solution is simple (Score:4, Informative)
Saying "Don't pirate" is easy. Getting a company of any size to reach 100% compliance is utterly painful. It's no different than being autdited by the IRS -- they're going to get you for something.
Re:Seriously though (Score:4, Informative)
Do you have a copy of the reciept for every piece of software? That thumb drive that uses an encryption program... which is installed on the PC, where is the reciept for that $10 thumb drive? No reciept is a violation... Just ask the BSA or read the article. There is almost nobody in full compliance. My biggest violation is a lack of reciepts. All my copies of MS Office are in violation except the newest one simply because I haven't kept the reciepts.
These violations are being weeded out as I migrate to Ubuntu and dispose of the obsolete high liability software.
Re:AutoCad Substitute? (Score:3, Informative)
AutoCAD substitute? Try CATIA... (Score:3, Informative)
Check it out here [wikipedia.org].
Re:10,000 abacuses? How about 10,000 Linux install (Score:5, Informative)
No, a company was fined for not being able to prove they were not using Microsoft software illegally.
Although the EULA doesn't state they must provide a receipt for the software, or that the "Certificate of Authenticity" doesn't certify that the software is authentic (go figure), that is the standard to which Microsoft holds its customers on penalty of lawsuit or (more commonly) extortion.
I received two letters from the BSA in 2003, both warning me that I could be liable for "hundreds of thousands of dollars" if they audit my business and I am unable to prove that every copy of their member company's software was legally purchased. They helpfully offered, "Can your business afford that risk?"
Y'know, I couldn't. I switched to free-as-in-freedom software.
Re:Dupe (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.news.com/2008-1082_3-5065859.html [news.com]
Re:Linux users missed a chance... (Score:3, Informative)
I read an interview with Ernie Ball after the raid. He DID switch to Red Hat Linux, and by his estimate saves $100K per year. He thanked microsoft for the money he is now saving.
Re:10,000 Abacuses? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:BSA Tip Line (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No sympathy for Ball. (Score:3, Informative)
not that there's anything wrong with that (Score:3, Informative)
Re:10,000 Abacuses? (Score:3, Informative)
"Beyond hunting for dicey characters buying and selling counterfeits, the BSA also devotes significant attention to other forms of what it calls piracy by business users. The money harvested in these company-by-company crackdowns is not parceled to its members whose copyrights were infringed; the funds stay with the BSA to fuel its operations. (BSA's worldwide settlements soared 53 percent last year to $56 million.)"
I could list a number of reasons why this statement alone pisses me off, but I'd be wasting my breath. I'd be hard pressed to find someone on this site that would disagree with anything I would have to say. Read through the article, see if you can do it without thinking something rotten about the BSA.