Google's Gdrive Raises Instant Privacy Concerns 197
An anonymous reader writes "The rumor mill is already raging over the potential functionality and capacity for Google's online storage service we talked about earlier this week (the company says 'it makes sense' to put all its Web apps under the same umbrella). But Internet rights advocates are now crying foul over liability issues, a probable lack of encryption and a cash-cow model that could scan all your personal data for advertising keywords. From the article: "'Google would be wise to offer users an option to encrypt your information,' says Nimrod Kozlovski, a professor of Internet law at Tel Aviv University. 'It really needs to have really detailed explanations of what the legal expectations are for storing your info.'""
you have the choice (Score:5, Insightful)
You have the choice to:
Seriously, the issues raised are the same as with the other on-line storage services. And, this move by Google mostly integrates/consolidates what they already offer, albeit with the extension of storing any kind of data. I think it's great, I've started storing much of my data on line in various forums and I love the internet access. At your parents house and need a file? Download from the clouds. Got a special inside track on a new job and they need your resume, quick? From the clouds. Serenity now!
If you've got data you think sensitive, encrypt it, or figure out a different way to store it. Personally, from anecdotal, but plentiful, observation, those who store their data "in"/on the internet:
As for the screaming about Google figuring out a way to make money doing this, hwah? Kind of what running a company is about. And the more money they figure out how to make by ads makes the price point that much less for you and me, or anyone willing to trust Google. For the moment, I am. I'm assuming I'll get enough warning signs to not trust them, I'll move my data elsewhere. For now, good for Google.
This isn't new, just big. And, from a personal standpoint, I hope it's one more ding in Microsoft's armor. The more there are alternatives to data locked up in Microsoft's products, the better chances of real competition, and ultimately progress (finally!) in technology. (sorry, had to dig... this is slashdot, right?)
but what (Score:1, Insightful)
Jesus Christ (Score:5, Insightful)
Besides, what's so special even if they'd do this? It's the norm to not encrypt mails. It's the norm to not encrypt instant messages on servers on services that provide offline messaging (Messenger, ICQ,
As usual, when this is released, I think *gasp* that the users will just have to decide for themselves if they care for having encryption or not. They'll also be free to encrypt their data. Why the rumor mill? Just chill and take it for what it is, as with any other service. It's not like Google will force you onto it. Then I could see the fearmongering kicking in early be more motivated.
I am so tired of hearing about this. (Score:5, Insightful)
I do not get it (Score:3, Insightful)
Can't say I'm concerned (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I trust Google as of now... (Score:5, Insightful)
"Internet rights advocates are now crying foul" (Score:5, Insightful)
Just like your emails: you pay them by giving data so that they can search it advertise to you. Why would anyone think that they would do anything else with more of your data.
If you are sufficiently naive to think that a company will simply give you free online storage for no benefit to themselves, than I have a bridge to sell you. Lots of traffic, one careful owner...
This is Madness. This is Slashdot. (Score:5, Insightful)
how could Google encrypt? (Score:3, Insightful)
Encryption has to happen client-side.
Re:I trust Google as of now... (Score:3, Insightful)
Pretty much anyone who has ever dated has been in this situation. And yet the world is littered with broken hearts, cheating/backstabbing boyfriends/girlfriends, bitter breakups, and vicious divorce proceedings. I'm not saying one shouldn't trust people, but your a complete idiot if you think you can't get brutally hurt. At least with love the risk is worth it... what does google give you? Free webmail? Some online storage? Yeah. That's worth handing over my private life for. I can get a service like that for pennies a month. My private life is worth more than that. Is yours really that worthless?
They're a data miner, sure, but they have always done in the least intrusive way as possible.
Ah, so as long as you don't realize it, or even know about it, then its ok.
So thanks for being watchdogs and all, but as of right now, Google has my trust.
If you ever stop trusting them they still have everything you ever gave them, and more.
Your email, your conversations, your documents, your address, the business you associate with, the people you associate with, your friends, your family, the stocks you track, your political leanings, and much much more.
Some us are thinking ahead so that hopefully people like you don't get raped by the future. Your privacy is important, its a shame you value it so poorly.
These "privacy advocates" have no business (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Trust the large corporation (Score:2, Insightful)
I let my E-mail Provider Read All My Mail (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't have GMail. I pay for a service (*) rather than look at ads.
But you know what, I still let my e-mail provider read all my mails. How else does anyone think that spam filters work? You can't filter out spam without reading the e-mails.
It's not like Eric Schmidt is there reading each message looking for the good ones.
* service = fastmail.fm I highly recommend them.
Griping about vaporware (Score:2, Insightful)