KDE 4 to Be Released on January 11th 300
VincenzoRomano writes "It's official! KDE 4.0 will be released on January 11th of next year. The release itself doesn't sound very firm, as 'the developers are confident to be able to release a more polished and better working KDE' and not the long awaited prime-time release. At the very first Alpha release on march 11th, the release date had been forecasted to October 2007, and then shifted to the end of the year with the second Beta. Despite this, the promises for the fourth version are quite interesting and maybe deserve a 'stay tuned'."
KDE File Manager (Score:5, Interesting)
Konq was the killer app for me, I have to confess I'm a little worried about Dolphin becoming the default file manager. I've not used Dolphin much yet, but it will have to be pretty damn good to match what Konq could do. Will I still be able to have terminal, web and file panes all within the same tab? How about dragging images from a website to my /home within a single window, or middle clicking a file or link to open it in a viewer in a new tab? Konq allowed me to keep the amount of open windows to a minimum. I guess time will tell and I should start playing with Dolphin.
I should note that I bloody hate Dolphins (my ex loved the damn things). They aren't as cute as you think, they smell of fish and have attempted genocide [wheelock.edu] on porpoises and even attack humans [scotsman.com]. Why is it that every crystal swinging hippie who lives 1000 miles from the sea wants to be a marine biologist? Dolphins!
Re:What are the main differences between KDE & (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:who might slip the release date? (Score:2, Interesting)
Excellent news for old-farts. (Score:4, Interesting)
Good news: the memory footprint of 'Strigi' is supposed to be lower then Beagle
Great news: You can install/use KDE4 without 'Plasma' (KDE 4 eyecandy)
Awesome news: KDE-based apps should work on Mac & Windows (properly ported)
Firefox has done an awesome job of weening people off Internet Explorer as "The Internet", as more killer-apps (Amarok I am looking at you) become available on Windows it will be easier to get folks to switch.
I use Fluxbox as my WM with KDE-base and KDElibs for my backend. Conky is as fancy as it gets for my eyecandy. I look forward to KDE4 because of all the good stuff that I can make use of. I just hope to $deity that they keep the eye-candy as optional. I am not looking forward to their whole concept of active-desktop/"its where you work dude"/make it an experience that people can interact with.
Rule #1) The DE/WM is HOW you access your programs, and should be invisible to the process.
Rule #2) Just because the median processor/ram is 42-times more powerfull then it was x-years ago does not mean that your programs can be 42-times more bloated.
Rule #3) Keep everything optional. Just because you think that everybody on the planet is stupid for not wanting something, does not mean everybody actually does want it.
Re:Sounds familiar (Score:2, Interesting)
i thought anonymous cowards trolling and talking from their asses weren't supposed to be moded +5 informative...
Re:What are the main differences between KDE & (Score:4, Interesting)
In between these two extremes there are people who actually use their computer. You don't have to change everything to make yourself more comfortable.
Here are a few things that I tweak/use regularly:
Display bug kills my KDE experience (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What are the main differences between KDE & (Score:4, Interesting)
o My wife spilled water in my keyboard (which I love, so I don't want to replace). The left control key doesn't work, so I have X configured to rebind the capslock key ask control.
o I have tons of non-standard apt repositories configured for different programs that I want to keep up-to-date automatically.
o I configured a 32-bit chroot environment so run WINE and Opera work with a 64-bit OS.
o I have a few locally-compiled apps, some of which I've added shell support for.
o I've customized the keyboard shortcuts, albeit mostly to mimic windows. I prefer Win+R to Alt+F2, so shoot me.
o A buncho of UI adjustments (mainly the Kicker)
OTOH, I do still have the default background.
Re:What are the main differences between KDE & (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:What are the main differences between KDE & (Score:4, Interesting)
However, there are dozens of little tiny obscure features that I use and love, and that wouldn't exist if KDE weren't so configurable. Examples: I have a "stay on top" button on the window titlebars, which I use fairly often, I have several windows configured with custom settings through "Special Window Settings" (to make them show up on the right desktop, for example), I've disabled icons on my desktop altogether, I've tweaked my keyboard shortcuts and configured the extra keys on my keyboard for common actions, and a whole bunch of other little things that I've added over the years. These are less than 1% of the available options, but the point is that they're the 1% that I care about.
Re:Birthday for me? (Score:5, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Sounds familiar (Score:3, Interesting)
That's not a difference between KDE and Vista. Actually, KDE and Vista are very much the same in this regard, and the main point of Vista is a slew of new changes under the hood that aren't immediately visible to end users. In fact, that's the main reason users are griping; they don't see too much difference between XP and Vista except for some eye candy. However, anyone who actually develops programs for Vista is not complaining about it or jumping on the anti-Microsoft bandwagon that seems to be so crowded right now. WPF, WCF, DirectX 10, and WF are all very useful for developers, and the programs we can write using them will be very cool, and will ultimately impress end users. But it will be a while before some of these new features in Vista are fully exploited, and until then, the common user gripes. Don't mistake their griping for knowledgeable critiquing though; most are clueless, and what you just said about KDE applies equally well to Vista.
Re:Birthday for me? (Score:2, Interesting)