lisah writes "Linux.com's Robin 'Roblimo' Miller will moderate a live debate today, Wednesday, December 5 at 1pm US EST (GMT -5), between the GNOME Foundation's press officer Jeff Waugh and fair competition advocate Roy Schestowitz. Both have strong — and opposing — points of view regarding GNOME's involvement with Microsoft's OOXML standard and vehemently defend their positions, so getting them together in the same virtual room ought to prove quite interesting. Although the broadcast will be archived as a podcast and available for free download, you can listen live as it's recorded and also call in to participate and ask questions."
One book? I decided to actually see how big the standard is one day (6000 pages, right?) It was eight encyclopedias (~750 pages each). I'd rather carry the ODF standard any day.
The Republican Youtube debate caused me to loose what little faith I had in CNN's ability to host a republican debate. It made the entire format look ridiculous (whereas I thought the Democratic one was great)
"Those who do not wish to use proprietary software (Flash, MP3) to hear this conference over the Internet are also invited to use this call-in number. It will be active approximately 10 minutes before the live podcast begins."
Yes, it's funny how open source zealots have become something like vegans, and in some places (like linux.com) they have special menus (not so tasty, but good enough). It's like being allergic to mp3.
most vegans I know don't eat vegetables take control of their body and make them hear and see things they can't stop. crap like Flash is the opposite of what open source is trying to achieve, but if you want to give control of your computer to those who want to turn it into a 24x7 revenue source you go right ahead
It didn't make much sense to me when I read it, but then I know some fish eating vegans and vegetarians. The vegans claim fish can't feel pain, because they have no central nervous system and the vegetarian hates fish and wants them all to die ASAP, he's quite amusing.
I am a separate Digg reader. Yes I do. Keep in mind there is also a lot stories on there that bash the hell out of MS and show off cool new things in Linux. It's like the vegan argument [slashdot.org] being made elsewhere. Yes I know that Digg has ties to things I wish it did not but if I always let things like that stop me then I would be living in a far more restricted life on the net. Hell, I remember seeing advertisements for MS studio on Slashdot. They might not have been from MS but since it's supporting MS in sligh
by Anonymous Coward
on Wednesday December 05 2007, @08:18AM (#21583969)
"Look, GNOME and Microsoft are both in the business of restricting what users can do with their computers - we just have different approaches. So let's work together!"
Without trying to stir up a flamewar, it is things like this one that bug me, and have always bugged me about the GNOME project. Far more than the technical issues, as the project has clearly been producing a lot of high-quality software.
I see no reason why a project which was started as a direct response to another project perceived not to be completely Free (which was quite justified at that time) should have anything to do with certifying obfuscated formats made by monopolists or support their proprietary software platforms (see Mono) and pushes by some people within GNOME to make them a central part of the GNOME infrastructure. I don't understand experiments like Eazel, with big industry hotshots coming in to design proper interfaces for the masses who don't understand them, and there are other confusing examples. GNOME was originally a project with a political goal, so I don't understand how its politics have become so bizarre.
As an external observer who doesn't use much GNOME technology, but values the contributions that the project has done to the Free Software landscape, I have to wonder what the hell some people in there are thinking. I realise that there are many different viewpoints within the GNOME project and that this issue is likely not as grave as some are trying to make it, but there is simply no excuse for supporting OOXML in my eyes. None.
What does it all have to do with GNOME anyway? Why is my desktop of choice even entering into a debate on OOXML. If the chap is supporting OOXML because he happens to think that Microsoft has struck gold in their waste land of creativity then that's fine. However if he (and others) are supporting it in the name of GNOME or its community then some thing really needs to be done to decouple this situation from my desktop.
I think GNOME is the best thing since sliced bread and I defend its design chioces. I think OOXML has nothing to do with GNOME and therefor I ignore it completely (in this context). What is different between those on this bandwagon and myself?
I think it is more important to (try to) ensure Gnumeric works. So e.g. 1900 should be a leap year and ceiling() function rounds up (towards positive infinity). OOXML defines otherwise, btw.
I think OOXML has nothing to do with GNOME and therefor I ignore it completely (in this context).
Of course it does. This is about replacing GConfd with an Excel spreadsheet in OOXML format. The current system is too simple, and doesn't have enough things that can go wrong, so clearly complications need to be introduced.
support their proprietary software platforms (see Mono) and pushes by some people within GNOME
I thought Mono was an entirely seperate implementation of the technology that wasn't initially compatible with, or related to the microsoft.NET thing in any case.
Not that I care much, I don't much like all this.NET style stuff anyway, my needs are somewhat simpler. C or Python (or both together, Mmm embedding...) fulfill all of my requirements, and they don't have any platform issues.
Of course, the problem with your comments is that the GNOME Foundation **doesn't** contribute to or endorse OOXML... We're drilling Microsoft for documentation, so we can make sure FLOSS products (not just GNOME products) can interoperate with it. In terms of conspiracy theories, that's not very potent.:-) There is a very valid point of disagreement: whether engagement will be perceived (or should be perceived) as support, and whether Microsoft will try to do that themselves. I hope that as a community, we
I am certainly not one of those KDE fanboys who will jump at every opportunity to berate GNOME, I am simply a bit confused with how certain things have been handled. Software freedom is something very important to me, as well as you, and I don't see how supporting an obfuscated, potentially patent-infested format designed not to be interoperable with anything, will do anything other than strengthen the position of the monopolist who is one of the main obstacles for more widespread adoption of Free Software i
I don't see how supporting an obfuscated, potentially patent-infested format designed not to be interoperable with anything, will do anything other than strengthen the position of the monopolist who is one of the main obstacles for more widespread adoption of Free Software in the first place.
Everything in the software world is patent infested, but in this case the Microsoft Open Specification Promise covers OOXML 1.0. It may not cover future versions, you may not trust the
then can we also request a song and dedicate it to someone?
"Hello, who's that?" "Hi Robin, it's Richard" "Hello Richard, do you have a question?" "Well actually, I wanted to request a song please" "Um, I'm sorry Richard, but this isn't that kind of show" "Oh, OK then." *Hangs up* "OK, if anyone has any questions, not song requests, then please call this number..."
I'll be listening in and I'm really hoping for a lively debate with lots of ad hominem attacks.
Jeff: "... and the document size is excellent!"
Roy: "Yeah, but tell me one thing: why should we believe someone who cheats on his wife?"
Just what we need, yet more sound and fury, absent any real information. Just two guys who never run out of words, and yet who never really say anything. Waste of time- go watch Springer; it's the same thing, plus chairs will be thrown.
TFA says the debate will be hosted at BlogTalkRadio [blogtalkradio.com]. Fine, but WTF is up with the meta tags on that page? Representative samples include:
AfroNerd
Field Negro
smart mobs
commercial space flight
pornography
No one says a blog has to stay on-topic, of course, but that's... diverse.
OOXML itself might be the bastard mutant stepchild of DIVx [about.com], but there is some room for open source projects to pose for themselves that eternal question:
You ever dance with the devil by the pale moonlight?--The Joker
Does it strike anyone else as strange that GNOME (which, I understand, began as an alternative to KDE because of its reliance on non-free software) is apparently such an enthusiastic supporter of Microsoft technologies like OOXML and.NET?
For the developer who wants to spend his time developing applications rather than worrying about memory management then.Net is a great framework. The fact that it is cross-platform (as long as you're careful with windowing toolkits) is also a bonus. Microsoft purposefully released specs for the framework and it seems to be fairly well specified based on the amount of support in Mono.
OOXML is a bit stranger for Gnome to get involved in. Surely it's something that apps like Open Office should be concerned about, not the desktop people? I'd rather they were putting their effort into improving some of the tools they do have rather than working in things they don't have to directly support.
.
Disclaimer: I use Linux, I even use Gnome (have done since Redhat 7.3), I enjoy the freedom and power of open source, and I do dual-boot Windows XP. I code my own projects in C# and don't hate things purely because they're MS, just because they're generally not as well specified or obviously flawed compared to alternatives.
OOXML is a bit stranger for Gnome to get involved in. Surely it's something that apps like Open Office should be concerned about, not the desktop people?
They are not only "desktop people". I'm not too familiar with Gnome developement but isn't Gnome Office (Abiword,Gnumeric etc.) part of the Gnome project?... OK, I just checked the Gnome Foundation members list: both Jody Goldberg and Morten Welinder of Gnumeric fame are members. Definitely not just "desktop people".
No, the parent post to that said "don't you think it's strange that..." so I was saying no it's not strange for.Net but yes it is string for OOXML. It wasn't "do I want.Net? No. Do I want OOXML? Yes" as that would just be crazy;) Gnome people might not be just desktop people, but Gnome (to me and probably most people) is based around the desktop and the window management/appearance (yes, WM is metacity, but metacity is generally Gnome and not KDE). It includes various config apps and some of the core stuf
For the developer who wants to spend his time developing applications rather than worrying about memory management then.Net is a great framework.
Cross-platform, garbage collected languages existed long before.NET rolled around. Is it really that much better than Python? And now that Java is FOSS, is there truly still a niche for C# on Linux? Hint: "no" works well for both.
I've never seen a "full app" written in Python, and especially not one for Windows, only small config utilities and the like for Gnome etc. It is possible, since Exaile is a Python app, but Python is still very much in the minority. As for Java, it still doesn't have the direct runable-ness of an exe that.Net does that Windows users are used to. If you're publishing for the non-tech savvy then that counts for a lot.
There may have been other cross-platform, garbage collected languages before.Net, but how ma
As for Java, it still doesn't have the direct runable-ness of an exe that.Net does that Windows users are used to.
And whose fault is that?
Answer: Microsoft, for not including a JRE in Windows. Apple has a JRE, you can just directly run a.jar executable. It could be that way on Windows if Microsoft wasn't hell-bent to destroy Java.
(Also, I don't have a.NET runtime on any of my computers, and.NET exes are totally unrunnable on all of them, including the Windows ones.)
Answer 2: it is also Sun's for having JAR files that aren't necessarily executable and can't be differentiated from library JARs..Net, on the other hand, has.exe for executable and.dll for library code (normally). To your basic user then that's far more accessible and understandable than these strange JAR files that sometimes run and sometimes don't. Even after I've installed Sun's JRE/JDK on Windows then JAR files end up with a "text file" icon. That's sure to confuse people and should be something that
And, importantly from a non-techy point of view, it normally fails without a visible message. Okay, so.Net apps aren't greatly better with their cryptic error and error number, but at least it gives you something to look for to work out why it isn't working.
Jars being libraries and executables can be advantageous in one way but at the same time then it is a bit like bending to rules and botching a solution. Yes, you can re-use an app that is Jared up as a library for another app, but that then means you've
There's no smoking gun, but Miguel's own writings on the topic suggest that even GNOME was intended to be a playpen for him to start cloning Microsoft's technologies. From http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/gnome-history.html [ximian.com]:
At Microsoft I learned the truth about ActiveX and COM and I got very interested in it inmediately. Upon my return to Mexico Federico and I started to design a GUI control infrastructure for Unix that we code named `GNOME'. He was working as the maintainer of the GIMP back th
Fun, fun, fun (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Do you believe every word of it?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
The Republican Youtube debate caused me to loose what little faith I had in CNN's ability to host a republican debate. It made the entire format look ridiculous (whereas I thought the Democratic one was great)
6pm in GMT (Score:2)
Irony (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Did that make sense to you when you wrote it?
Re: (Score:1)
As a carnivore (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Just checking the link for Roy Schestowitz (Score:2)
Slashdotted already ? Or maybe the Novell boycotter also boycotted the invoices from the webhost ?
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Which Side Will Say This First? (Score:5, Funny)
It's things like this that bug me about GNOME (Score:5, Insightful)
I see no reason why a project which was started as a direct response to another project perceived not to be completely Free (which was quite justified at that time) should have anything to do with certifying obfuscated formats made by monopolists or support their proprietary software platforms (see Mono) and pushes by some people within GNOME to make them a central part of the GNOME infrastructure. I don't understand experiments like Eazel, with big industry hotshots coming in to design proper interfaces for the masses who don't understand them, and there are other confusing examples. GNOME was originally a project with a political goal, so I don't understand how its politics have become so bizarre.
As an external observer who doesn't use much GNOME technology, but values the contributions that the project has done to the Free Software landscape, I have to wonder what the hell some people in there are thinking. I realise that there are many different viewpoints within the GNOME project and that this issue is likely not as grave as some are trying to make it, but there is simply no excuse for supporting OOXML in my eyes. None.
Re:It's things like this that bug me about GNOME (Score:4, Insightful)
The clue to the second clause lies in the first.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's things like this that bug me about GNOME (Score:5, Interesting)
I think GNOME is the best thing since sliced bread and I defend its design chioces. I think OOXML has nothing to do with GNOME and therefor I ignore it completely (in this context). What is different between those on this bandwagon and myself?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:1)
I think it is more important to (try to) ensure Gnumeric works. So e.g. 1900 should be a leap year and ceiling() function rounds up (towards positive infinity). OOXML defines otherwise, btw.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course it does. This is about replacing GConfd with an Excel spreadsheet in OOXML format. The current system is too simple, and doesn't have enough things that can go wrong, so clearly complications need to be introduced.
Re: (Score:2)
I thought Mono was an entirely seperate implementation of the technology that wasn't initially compatible with, or related to the microsoft
Not that I care much, I don't much like all this
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/ecma-tc45-statement.html [gnome.org]
I think having read this most of your points just do not stand anymore.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
There is a very valid point of disagreement: whether engagement will be perceived (or should be perceived) as support, and whether Microsoft will try to do that themselves. I hope that as a community, we
Re: (Score:2)
Software freedom is something very important to me, as well as you, and I don't see how supporting an obfuscated, potentially patent-infested format designed not to be interoperable with anything, will do anything other than strengthen the position of the monopolist who is one of the main obstacles for more widespread adoption of Free Software i
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Everything in the software world is patent infested, but in this case the Microsoft Open Specification Promise covers OOXML 1.0. It may not cover future versions, you may not trust the
If we can call in (Score:2, Funny)
"Hello, who's that?"
"Hi Robin, it's Richard"
"Hello Richard, do you have a question?"
"Well actually, I wanted to request a song please"
"Um, I'm sorry Richard, but this isn't that kind of show"
"Oh, OK then."
*Hangs up*
"OK, if anyone has any questions, not song requests, then please call this number..."
Ad Hominem (Score:4, Funny)
Jeff: "... and the document size is excellent!"
Roy: "Yeah, but tell me one thing: why should we believe someone who cheats on his wife?"
What!? Gnome supporting OOXML!? (Score:1)
Where have I been? Living under a rock?!
two fact-challenged foamy debaters (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
WTF with that feed host? (Score:2)
TFA says the debate will be hosted at BlogTalkRadio [blogtalkradio.com]. Fine, but WTF is up with the meta tags on that page? Representative samples include:
No one says a blog has to stay on-topic, of course, but that's... diverse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:No point. (Score:4, Interesting)
For the developer who wants to spend his time developing applications rather than worrying about memory management then
OOXML is a bit stranger for Gnome to get involved in. Surely it's something that apps like Open Office should be concerned about, not the desktop people? I'd rather they were putting their effort into improving some of the tools they do have rather than working in things they don't have to directly support.
.
Disclaimer: I use Linux, I even use Gnome (have done since Redhat 7.3), I enjoy the freedom and power of open source, and I do dual-boot Windows XP. I code my own projects in C# and don't hate things purely because they're MS, just because they're generally not as well specified or obviously flawed compared to alternatives.
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
.Net? No. OOXML? Yes.
Didn't you mean ".Net? Yes. OOXML? No." ?
OOXML is a bit stranger for Gnome to get involved in. Surely it's something that apps like Open Office should be concerned about, not the desktop people?
They are not only "desktop people". I'm not too familiar with Gnome developement but isn't Gnome Office (Abiword,Gnumeric etc.) part of the Gnome project? ... OK, I just checked the Gnome Foundation members list: both Jody Goldberg and Morten Welinder of Gnumeric fame are members. Definitely not just "desktop people".
Re: (Score:2)
Gnome people might not be just desktop people, but Gnome (to me and probably most people) is based around the desktop and the window management/appearance (yes, WM is metacity, but metacity is generally Gnome and not KDE). It includes various config apps and some of the core stuf
Re: (Score:2)
Cross-platform, garbage collected languages existed long before .NET rolled around. Is it really that much better than Python? And now that Java is FOSS, is there truly still a niche for C# on Linux? Hint: "no" works well for both.
Re: (Score:2)
As for Java, it still doesn't have the direct runable-ness of an exe that
There may have been other cross-platform, garbage collected languages before
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And whose fault is that?
.jar executable. It could be that way on Windows if Microsoft wasn't hell-bent to destroy Java.
.NET runtime on any of my computers, and .NET exes are totally unrunnable on all of them, including the Windows ones.)
Answer: Microsoft, for not including a JRE in Windows. Apple has a JRE, you can just directly run a
(Also, I don't have a
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Even after I've installed Sun's JRE/JDK on Windows then JAR files end up with a "text file" icon. That's sure to confuse people and should be something that
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
But I have been using Azureus on windows and I never had to wonder about JAR or not JAR with it.
At the end of the day it's all up to the people who package the software.
Re: (Score:2)
In
With a jar, I can execute it and it runs, or I can use it as a library, no problems. If it doesn't have an Executable class defined it fails.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, so
Jars being libraries and executables can be advantageous in one way but at the same time then it is a bit like bending to rules and botching a solution. Yes, you can re-use an app that is Jared up as a library for another app, but that then means you've
Re: (Score:2)
I was under the impression that Bittorrent was rather popular with the kids.
On Linux, many of them. Since the question at hand involves Gnome software, that seems pretty relevant.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
There's no smoking gun, but Miguel's own writings on the topic suggest that even GNOME was intended to be a playpen for him to start cloning Microsoft's technologies. From http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/gnome-history.html [ximian.com]: