Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Government News

FCC Requires Backup Power For 210K Cell Towers 248

1sockchuck alerts us to an article in Data Center Knowledge that explores ramifications from the FCC's decision a couple of months back to require backup power for cell sites and other parts of the telecom infrastructure. The new rule was prompted by wireless outages during Hurricane Katrina. There are more than 210,000 cell towers in the US, as well as 20,000 telecom central offices that will also need generators or batteries. Municipalities are bracing for disputes as carriers try to add generators or batteries to cell sites on rooftops or water towers. The rules will further boost demand in the market for generators, where there are already lengthy delivery backlogs for some models.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FCC Requires Backup Power For 210K Cell Towers

Comments Filter:
  • by EmbeddedJanitor ( 597831 ) on Monday December 10, 2007 @11:53PM (#21651379)
    A generator is far less likely to get knocked out that power lines. Consider how many points of failure there are in grid-provided power.

    24 hours is sufficent to cover for brief, minor outages. It is not enough to cover for anything close to a natural disaster where many sites lose power and there are not enough resources to fix them all in 24 hours.

    Here in New Zealand, all our telecom has 24 hour battery backup but it is sized "just right". Last year we lost power for approx 40 hours due to a severe snow storm. The phones lasted for appeox 25 hours.

  • by techno-vampire ( 666512 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @12:00AM (#21651409) Homepage
    Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator.


    Not so. That all depends on where the damage is. If it's at, or fairly near the tower, quite possibly. If the power's out because a power line was dropped by the temblor, there's a good chance that the cell tower and any generator are just fine. I remember after the Northridge Quake there were major power outages, but the equipment worked just fine as soon as the power was back. As far as floods go, there's no reason not to install them in waterproof rooms to make sure they're OK even if that room's under water.

  • by Tisha_AH ( 600987 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @01:03AM (#21651775) Journal
    To provide solar power to a cell site would require several hundred square feet of space to mount the panels. Sizing a solar power system for infrastructure requires planning for when the amount of sun is at the minimum (approx 2 hours during wintertime at northern latitudes). A aolar system must put a full charge on the battery system to account for charging losses, battery inefficiency, and the continual demand of the load. To match up to a solar power system you need a very significant battery string (when I do system calculations I assume that the system can go for three days without sun). Mounting a wind turbine on a cell tower is problematic too. An antenna structure has a loading (ANSI 222 (f or g)) that has to account for ice, maximum wind and the surface area of the tower, feedline, antennas, etc... A wind turbine adds ALOT of loading to a structure. I suspect that 90% of the cell towers out there right now could not pass the structural analysis under ANSI.
  • by T_O_M ( 149414 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @01:33AM (#21651955)
    Because the Communications Act of 1934 (and as ammended) requires the FCC to regulate telephone companies as part of Interstate Commerce.
    Also because cell phones use radio frequencies, also regulated by the FCC.
  • by TooMuchToDo ( 882796 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @01:49AM (#21652057)
    Most critical unmanned infrastructure uses natural gas generators onsite, not stored diesel, so they're not going to run out unless the natural gas infrastructure is damaged as well (which is a definite possibility in cases such as Katrina).
  • by TooMuchToDo ( 882796 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @01:54AM (#21652079)
    GSM does allow you to prioritize emergency traffic:

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:cwTrqX9BMl8J:www.cse.umkc.edu/~beardc/WorkSummary.pdf+GSM+emergency+priority+traffic&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us&client=firefox-a [64.233.167.104]

    Wireless Priority Services
    - Became a high priority after September 11, 2001.
    Extension of the U.S. wireline GETS system that had been around for many years.
    Used the same call queuing approach.
    Only available from GSM providers
    - Only GSM has priority call identifiers.

  • Katrina (Score:5, Informative)

    by tsotha ( 720379 ) on Tuesday December 11, 2007 @06:36AM (#21653381)

    Regarding hurricane Katrina:

    I work for a large cell carrier. We had backup power to every single cell in the area. In fact, after the hurricane we were doing pretty well, though some of the towers were taken out by debris. Only a couple were actually submerged. We lost a few trunk lines, but for the most part the system was working.

    The problem was we didn't have any way to get gas to the generators. The roads were impassible, and based on news reports we were reluctant to send crews in to the sites we could reach for security reasons. So after a couple days the cell sites started going offline one at a time as the generators ran out of power.

    As far as I know every one of our sites, in the entire country, already has a couple days worth of backup power.

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...