Mobile Linux Group Releases First Specification 46
narramissic writes "Google's Android may be getting all the headlines, but the venerable LiPS (Linux Phone Standards Forum), which launched to much fanfare in 2005, is rolling out the specs. The group, comprised of companies including Orange, France Telecom, MontaVista, and Access, announced Monday that it has completed the first release of its mobile Linux specification, adding components including APIs for telephony, messaging, calendar, instant messaging, and presence functions, as well as new user interface components."
So where are the handset companies? (Score:3, Insightful)
Having a standard is all well and good, but it only matters if someone puts it into a phone.
Also, how many development platforms can survive in the cell phone market anyway? Besides Android and LiPS (we'll ignore Microsoft for now), there are Symbian [symbian.com], the LiMo Foundation [limofoundation.org] and a la Mobile [a-la-mobile.com] - all Linux-based. The first two or three to get accepted will attract the developers and dominate the market (unless they *really* bring something new to the game).
Never let reality temper imagination
playing catchup (Score:5, Insightful)
Google's Android may be getting all the headlines, but the venerable LiPS (Linux Phone Standards Forum), which launched to much fanfare in 2005, is rolling out the specs.
From what I understand, the LiPS had been "stuck in committee" with no real progress until Google announced Android. Then all of the sudden, there was a flurry of activity.
Specs are nice, and it's good to see progress, but the slashdot summary seems to have a distinct "look at LiPS, it's better, it has SPECS!". That's great, but..here's a prototype device running Android [engadget.com], and let's not forget the OpenMoko people, which have not only got a so-close-you-can-taste it physical device, they've got a pretty sorted software package as well, which runs on a couple of existing phone/pda widgets. The OpenMoko stuff and the Palm/HP/etc PDA stuff (I forget the proper project names, sorry!) is quite open and documented. The Linux-on-handheld boys have had working software out there for *years*.
Welcome to the party, boys. Beer's been had, chips are gone- there's some frosting left on the cake platter, though. Same thing to Google- it's nice that they have shiny prototypes, but if they're so open-source, why couldn't they work with any of the existing groups? Ah, I love the open source world: why help someone else, when you can re-invent your own wheel (anyone remember the days of Freshmeat's front page being literally FILLED with mp3 players software?)
Re:Too little, too late (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:So where are the handset companies? (Score:3, Insightful)
In reality, Nokia's S60, and Sony Ericsson UIQ, and DoCoMo's FOMA are about as similar as Mac OS X, Linux, AIX, Solaris, SCO Unix, etc. Imagine if the Unix vendors described their share of the desktop/server market the way Symbian does.
Origins: Why the iPhone is ARM, and isn't Symbian [roughlydrafted.com]
Smartphones: iPhone and the Big Fat Mobile Industry [roughlydrafted.com]
Re:Too little, too late (Score:3, Insightful)
The C++ programming language may support nice toys like templates and meta programming, which tend to be a headache to deal with and a pain to read. As a consequence, at least to some extent, the same applies to the STL. Nonetheless, who is forced to use all features of a language? No one.
So please don't say silly things. You only end up looking silly.
Re:Too little, too late (Score:3, Insightful)
I'll grant you that handling memory management manually on small embedded devices like phones may seem like a good idea, for now. But not for long.