Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
IBM Technology

IBM's Five Predictions for the Future 230

StonyandCher writes "IBM has released its second annual set of 'Next Five in Five' predictions. The company's crystal ball also revealed that the long-simmering trend toward "smart energy" devices will proliferate wildly. "Dishwashers, air conditioners, house lights, and more will be connected directly to a 'smart' electric grid, making it possible to turn them on and off using your cell phone or any Web browser," a company statement asserts."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IBM's Five Predictions for the Future

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    These new web controllable appliances will be vulnerable to exploits, resulting in someone's house burning down a house after a hacker turns on their stove.
    • by RobertM1968 ( 951074 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:42PM (#21826202) Homepage Journal

      These new web controllable appliances will be vulnerable to exploits, resulting in someone's house burning down a house after a hacker turns on their stove.

      Perhaps - if they become commonplace. There (for many years) have been controllable "appliances"... this is just an expansion of something that already existed. With stuff from SmartHome or X10, one could already control lights, AC, heat, security systems (with "back-links" to lights, and other stuff), locks and certain appliances via the web (and of course from home computers and dedicated/semi-dedicated consoles). Dishwashers (washing machines, dryers, etc) are something not yet on the "total control" aspect of such products... but I dont even see a need for that other than the "because I can" factor... why load a dishwasher and then wait to get to work/a friend's to go online to tell it to turn on (again, other than the "because I can" factor)?

      • by Almahtar ( 991773 ) on Thursday December 27, 2007 @12:21AM (#21827008) Journal
        I have a computer sitting at home hooked up to a stereo, with a webcam. I frequently remote desktop into it to retrieve some document or another. One day I got a diabolical plan, turned the webcam on and logged myself into two IM accounts, hooked up my microphone and started yelling "Here boy! Come here Sam (my dog's name)!", and laughed when my poor bewildered bullmastif showed up on a (very slowly refreshing) webcam wondering where the hell my voice was coming from.

        The dude intently staring at his laptop saying "Here boy, come here!!" draws a lot of attention in a cafe, but it was worth it.

        Why bother looking like a freak just to confuse a poor dog? Because I can!
        I'm hopeless.
        • by Viol8 ( 599362 )
          "poor bewildered bullmastif "

          What is it with some (usually short or skinny) guys and macho dogs? Is it a compensation device for deficiancies elsewhere?
          • Is that not being a bit stereotypical?

            Do you actually know the character of a bullmastiff? I know, and it is not what people think it is. A Bullmastiff is not a dangerous dog. It's working dog meant to track you down, and "sit" on you.

            http://www.bullmastiffsonline.com/history.html [bullmastiffsonline.com]

            "Gamekeepers then started their search for a dog that was strong, silent, fearless, agile and powerful enough to be able to run down and knock the poacher to the ground. They also required a breed that would not maul the poacher bu
          • by 0racle ( 667029 )
            Big dogs, even very big dogs, are often some of the sweetest, kindest and gentlest animals you can own. Perhaps you should try to not be a dick instead of implying things about others.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by PhotoGuy ( 189467 )

        Dishwashers (washing machines, dryers, etc) are something not yet on the "total control" aspect of such products... but I dont even see a need for that other than the "because I can" factor... why load a dishwasher and then wait to get to work/a friend's to go online to tell it to turn on (again, other than the "because I can" factor)?

        And there's more to it than that. I've seen more than one appliance meltdown in my day, and I've been glad I've been there to unplug them and take care of the problem. My gi

        • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

          by JimNTonik ( 1097185 )

          How about noise? Maybe you want to run the dishwater when you're out of the house so that it doesn't bother you when you're trying to relax at home? That feature in itself would be worth it for some.

          • by barakn ( 641218 )
            1. Turn on dishwasher. 2. Step outside.
          • Some dishwashers have timers for that reason. The whole "step-outside" thing doesn't work if you want to be sleeping while it runs.
          • For far less cost than a home automation system, you can get a silent dishwasher :)
            • Re: (Score:3, Funny)


              You must be a blessed man. I tried this idea, and not only did she turn out not to be silent (far from it) but the on-going maintenance costs were way beyond what I thought the initial purchase price was going to be.

              Even worse, the divorce and replacement costs would be enough to bankrupt me, so I'm stuck with this old model.

      • why load a dishwasher and then wait to get to work/a friend's to go online to tell it to turn on

        My mom often loads up the dishwasher before she leaves for work. When she leaves, I am usually still in bed so she usually doesn't turn it on. The current solution is to leave a note on the fridge that says "turn on the dishwasher when you get up!" and it works pretty well, but obviously it would be more handy and reliable for her to be able to either start it remotely or, even better, set a timer that tells

        • by Tim C ( 15259 )
          But does your mum not start the dishwasher because she wants it to start at a specific time, or simply because you're in bed? From the wording of your post, it sounds like the latter, and that she simply doesn't want to risk waking you up.

          I can't think of any reason why I would not want to start my dishwasher immediately if it was full and ready to go, unless I was concerned that it would wake someone up.

          even better, set a timer that tells it to start up at some specific time.

          This is a solved problem [amazon.com]. My pa
      • by tempest69 ( 572798 ) on Thursday December 27, 2007 @05:36PM (#21833752) Journal
        The concept of remote activation is sorta primitive. The real concept of smart devices is about utilizing smart metered power. The concept is this.. The power company auctions off power in real time to devices which automatically bid for "cheap energy blocks" The cheap energy blocks never exceed the price of standard energy. This allows the power company to adjust load based on production from non-predictable sources. So when a windfarm starts going crazy with power, the air conditioner in your house can go full steam for quarter price. As the number of smart devices increases, the prices can auction to higher values. As smart devices get more vogue, we can rely on sporadic power generation more and more.

        Right now, the power companies predict usage, with little control, with smart energy, they can tune usage much more efficiently.

        Storm

    • I would just redirect the neighbor's fridge to goatse and wait....
  • Spam (Score:4, Funny)

    by QuickFox ( 311231 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:40PM (#21825834)
    Next-generation spam:

    Nice house you've got there. Wouldn't it be sad if all the appliances suddenly went wild?
  • by toddbu ( 748790 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:40PM (#21825836)
    Any time anyone says that I can do something like power down appliances from my browser, I don't buy it. Either my appliances should be smart enough to power down on their own, or they should send me email telling me that it's time to shut them down. Polling for power consumption through a web site is pretty much a worthless idea.
    • Mod Parent Up (Score:5, Insightful)

      by maillemaker ( 924053 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:04PM (#21825994)
      I agree entirely. If I have to tell my appliances how to behave, then it is /I/ who am smart, not the appliance.

      Smart would be if I set a monthly power budget and all my appliances figure out together how to best achieve their jobs within that budget.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Gorobei ( 127755 )
        Agreed.

        Designing a good dishwasher is pretty damn simple, and cellphones are definitely not involved.

        1. It should have a button marked "WASH" - that causes the dishes to get washed. That's the whole point of the fucking machine.
        2. For extra credit, it can have a button marked "WASH CHEAPLY IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS" - I can understand that, and might press it before going to work some days.
        3. It should have a big hole in the top where I can pour several pounds of dishwashing detergent. When it starts runnin
        • Spin the dial to set the time you need the wash to be finished by (or don't spin it if you want it started straight away).
          Push the dial to lock it in (or start).

          I have a (Sony) vcr with a neat dial-based quick timer setting mechanism. You just twiddle the knob to set the start time and then push it in, twiddle it to set the end time and push it in, twiddle it to set the channel and push it in.
          • by Gorobei ( 127755 )
            That dial technology does sound cool, modulo the adding detergent thing (has that been solved?)

            If truth be known, I probably wouldn't even buy an iDishwasher. My current dishwasher setup is hi-tech enough that I need only place the used plate, etc, in a visible location, and the kitchen system whisks it away, cleans it, and returns it to the correct cupboard. My hi-tech stove is a similar marvel: it often detects that I am hungry, and asks me what I want to eat (my wife has to translate because it lacks
            • My current dishwasher setup is hi-tech enough that I need only place the used plate, etc, in a visible location, and the kitchen system whisks it away, cleans it, and returns it to the correct cupboard. My hi-tech stove is a similar marvel: it often detects that I am hungry, and asks me what I want to eat (my wife has to translate because it lacks an English language module,) then, a little while later, it produces the requested food item. Quite cool, actually. I'm surprised these things haven't caught on m
        • LOL! I just bought a new house, with a brand new dishwasher.

          The front of that thing looks like a Christmas tree! Hot Wash. Regular Wash. Pots and Pans Wash. High Temp Wash. Air Dry. Heat Dry.

          You are very correct - there should be one damn button - WASH.

          I don't mind so much having to add detergent with every load (I just spent 5 minutes filling it up with dishes, after all), but the interface is complicated.
    • by walt-sjc ( 145127 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:37PM (#21826172)
      Journalistic garbage is what it is.

      This is not about controlling your dishwasher through a web browser. That's fucking stupid and everyone in the industry knows it's stupid. Unfortunately, things are dumbed down for the consumer to understand.

      This is about automated energy management. Devices need to talk to each other and with the grid in order to be "smart". This allows energy suppliers and users to be able to manage / balance energy usage. But it's more than just energy usage - it's about devices that cooperate with each other. Your occupancy sensor works with the lighting and heating systems to keep people comfortable. They work with ambient light sensors and window blinds to keep the sun out when it is at a bad angle, or let let it in and power off / dim the overhead lights... You can come up with thousands of examples here...

      Echelon in San Jose has been developing this technology for many years, as have others. It's secure and reliable. Hell - remote energy management has been desirable / SOP for at LEAST 15 years, where chain stores remote control heating / lighting from corporate headquarters. It's just that power-line network technology has gotten good and inexpensive enough to move into much smaller devices. No, this isn't X-10 crap, it uses 128 bit device ID's and is a full network protocol. I tossed all my X10 crap years ago as it was WAY too unreliable and devices were poor quality. Unfortunately, the good stuff hasn't really made it down to the consumer level yet.
      • I'm all for the concept, but right now my DishNetwork receiver box can't even talk to my DVR, which can't even talk to my TV, not even to ask simple questions like "are you turned on?" "What channel are you on?"

        And that's a field where the benefits to the average consumer are obvious and immediate. Getting appliances to talk to each other is a pipe dream.
      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        by rodrigo1979 ( 255519 )
        I agree with the parent above

        I work in the HVAC/Building Automation/Energy Management field and can tell you that the application of the future is Automated demand response.
        One of our customers is now signed up on a program with SCE. On set days during the summer months when energy demand is expected to go higher than normal, we receive a signal over the Internet to a box with an integrated relay. Upon receiving this signal our web-based EMS system initiates a sequence for demand response by shutting off li
    • Hey this stuff is great. Next time I leave my house and forget to turn off my television, I use my cell phone to turn off my home television while I'm away at the restaurant.

      I have this dishwasher, and it turns off after the cycle is complete. It's AMAZING, and I don't even need to turn it off using a webbrowser. Sometimes, I can even set it to 'Air Dry' after the wash cycle.... without a cell phone. Incredible. ;)
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by jbengt ( 874751 )
      Commercial/industrial/hospital installations are already commonly providing interfaces through the web browser. In a large system a remote interface can often avoid the time and expense of a trip to the site to turn on a system just because someone's having an off-hours meeting.

      Although "powering down" an appliance doesn't have much utility on the face of it, it could be useful to be able to shut something down or turn it on from your browser when you're away. The common dumb example is to turn heating o
      • by tylernt ( 581794 ) on Thursday December 27, 2007 @01:50AM (#21827424)

        However, a better solution than monitoring that through the web is to shut the damn valves at the hose connection (you're supposed to do that every time you finish washing clothes, the hoses are prone to failure if left under pressure, but nobody, including me, does that.)
        They have hoses with integral valves now. There is a reducer in the washer end to restrict the flow, and a spring loaded valve in the supply side. If there is low flow, the safety valve is open (to allow the washer to operate). If there is high flow (burst hose), the valve closes, stopping the flood. Won't help you with a slow leak but it's still an improvement.

        There are also electric models that sit between the washer and the outlet. When it senses a current draw from the washer, it opens the solenoids to allow the water to flow. If the washer is off, the solenoids snap shut. This is safer but of course much more expensive.
    • by raftpeople ( 844215 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @10:18PM (#21826390)
      "Why didn't you power me down before you left? Do you think money grows on trees? When I was your age we shut off ALL appliances before leaving the house, by HAND! And another thing..."
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Hoi Polloi ( 522990 )
      Why would I want to control my lights remotely? Except maybe for a timer for security reasons when I'm away, otherwise I really don't need the lights on when I'm not there and if I'm there I can handle the light switch. If I can't remember to turn them off when I leave I'm not going to remember to find a wi-fi connection, logon to a website...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:40PM (#21825840)
    Yay for the editors linking to a blog ...that links to IBM's actual site.

    IBM Reveals Five Innovations that Will Change Our Lives Over the Next Five Years
    http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/22683.wss [ibm.com]
  • Smart roads, smart power grids, massively cross-indexed medical files... it may sound good on paper (and I would debate that in some cases), but who is going to rip up their extant traffic light systems, or rewire their house (let alone a city grid) for that kind of functionality?

    Who's going to provide this functionality, for that matter? Will we end up with a dozen mutually incompatible systems, and what happens when we want to upgrade what's already been half installed?

    • by rminsk ( 831757 )

      ... or rewire their house (let alone a city grid) for that kind of functionality?

      Southern California Edison is already doing this with SmartConnect [sce.com]. They plan on replacing 5 million electric meters between 2009 and 2012.

      SCE's new meters will also be able to "talk" through home area networks, providing customers with near real-time energy use and cost information to enable energy conservation. The Edison SmartConnect system has the ability to provide the information from the meter into the home through a two-way wireless interface allowing customers to immediately see how their actions affect usage. The result is expected to increase sustained energy conservation that will reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and smog-forming pollutants by a minimum of 365,000 metric tons per year -- the equivalent of removing 66,000 cars from the road.

    • by QuickFox ( 311231 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:09PM (#21826024)

      Who's going to provide this functionality, for that matter?
      Let's hope it's not Microsoft, or rewiring the traffic lights won't be enough, they'll also need to add lamps — red to stop, yellow to pay attention, green to go ahead, and Blue Light Of Death on system crash.
      • Interesting you mention Microsoft. I was considering buying the Ford Focus because of the cool multimedia control thingy, until I saw the ad on tv saying it is "Powered by Microsoft".
    • Who's going to provide it?

      Well let me see, I wonder if IBM would publish a report (advertise) research only being worked on by their rivals?
  • by dotancohen ( 1015143 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:52PM (#21825908) Homepage
    While these "smart grids" and "smart phones" and "smart appliances" are getting smarter, the idiot behind the wheel or at the keyboard is getting dumber and more pampered by the minute. We're getting so sheltered and pussywhipped that we won't be able to function as an independent species within a few decades. And no, I didn't read TFA, I'm too smart for that.
    • by Unoti ( 731964 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:59PM (#21825954) Journal

      We're getting so sheltered and pussywhipped that we won't be able to function as an independent species within a few decades
      You're probably right, but it's not really a bad thing. I can sure type faster and program computers better than my grandfather could. Don't think of humans in isolation. Think of them in combination with their technology. We may be wimpier in many ways compared to our ancestors. But if you make the comparison including our current technologies then we're advancing quite rapidly. We have longer life expectancy due to medical technology and better knowledge of health and nutrition. If you think of humans in a broad sense that includes knowledge and technology, then our progress as a race is stunning. We're better in countless ways now than we were just a short time ago, and getting better faster than we ever have before.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by mcsqueak ( 1043736 )

      While these "smart grids" and "smart phones" and "smart appliances" are getting smarter, the idiot behind the wheel or at the keyboard is getting dumber and more pampered by the minute.
      Yes, I'd agree and can see this coming... its exactly what I thought when I saw that ad for the Lexus that can parallel park itself. HELLO! I don't want to be driving on the same roads as people who cannot parallel park for themselves. Drivers are bad enough as it is, already...
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      We're getting so sheltered and pussywhipped that we won't be able to function as an independent species within a few decades.

      Humans haven't "function[ed] as an independent species" since cavemen first chipped tools out of flint. Technology is what makes us human beings rather than just rather weak, slow, hairless apes.
    • Fortunately, there are still vast tracts of barren forests for you. Why don't you just check out, burn all your artificially-created clothes, and live the hunter-gatherer lifestyle in the great Canadian north?
    • by Kjella ( 173770 )

      We're getting so sheltered and pussywhipped that we won't be able to function as an independent species within a few decades.

      I'd be the first to admit that in a primitive hunter-gatherer society, my skillset would be essentially worthless and I'd probably die a quick death from inexperience. That said, there's a huge difference between what you're taught and what your innate abilities are. Place any newborn child with a primitive tribe in the Amazon, and I doubt he'll do much differently than the natives. If we really needed to, there'd be no problem reverting to a more primitive society. While we wait for the apocalypse, I'll c

  • by Original Replica ( 908688 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:52PM (#21825916) Journal
    The company said that during the next five years, a "wave of connectivity" between vehicles and roadways will help keep traffic flowing smoothly

    Yeah the theoretical technology might exist, but major improvements to the national infrastructure will take decades to implement.

    "Dishwashers, air conditioners, house lights, and more will be connected directly to a 'smart' electric grid,

    Again this require a major improvement to parts of the infrastructure. On top of that, my parents already own all the appliances they want, they will not likely get many new ones anytime in the next five years. Maybe an HDTV.

    For example, phones will enable users to snap a photo of an article of clothing, pull in results from the Web about the brand and where to buy it, and then render the garment on top of a 3-D image of the user, IBM said.

    Many stores I have been in do not let you photograph the merchandise, if you can suddenly comparison shop the goods in any given store I can only see that policy getting stronger.

    This article sounds more like "The World of Tomorrow" than something I would expect out of a respected technology company.
    • The infrastructure for most of it already exists; all you need is a pervasive wireless data network, which cellphones have now provided.

      Infrastructure aside, we do need smarter clients; more gps-aware cellphones (so I can be warned before taking a route where all the cars are moving slowly), and other connected appliances (so my AC will shut off when I'm over 2 miles away from home, or I can punch a button telling my car I want the seats to be nice and warm in 5 minutes). It's more a problem of company

  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:53PM (#21825918) Journal
    So, according to IBM, there will be demand for how many computers? seven or eight?
  • Flying cars too! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by thanatos_x ( 1086171 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @08:57PM (#21825944)
    I have no doubt that some of these things will come to pass, but within 5 years? Nope, sorry.

    1. We'll be able to track produce, and every detail of it of where it's been, etc. - This would require a database and some ID tag (likely RFID) or an Read/Write tag and no database. Currently these are too expensive to have seen widespread use in larger goods, and despite predictions that they're just around the corner, they've been unable to lower the price past a certain point. RFID will happen, but it won't happen this fast.

    2. Smart Networks - This requires a significant investment in infrastructure, and it would seem, smart cars. This is something that may start within 5 years, but only cars made past a certain date will actually be 'smart', and until a certain percentage is 'smart' there's not much use for the system (possibly reducing the motivation for investment in the non-car infrastructure, though GPS/Onstar type services may provide enough incentive. Still it won't be here in 5 years.

    3. Cell phones - Stupid example. I don't need to know what clothing will look like on me in 3d, and this seems like an application that would be horrible on cell phones, even with advances in computer technology. It MIGHT happen in Asian countries, as they tend to have more advanced cell phones and seem to enjoy odd tech things that don't catch on well in the US (vending machines, etc)

    4. Smart Devices are over-rated. Until you can easily access your computer from your cell phone, this won't be down the road 5 years. Yes I'm sure you can do it, but it's not common, certainly not on non-smart phones.

    5. Doctors - It'll happen, medicine will advance, but i don't think we'll see any amazing changes. Admittedly I know little about this field, but I haven't heard anything huge inventions lately that will revolutionize the field.
    • Even the act of eating will take on new meaning, in IBM's view: "You will know everything from the climate and soil the food was grown in, to the pesticides and pollution it was exposed to, to the energy consumed to create the product, to the temperature and air quality of the shipping containers it traveled through on the way to your dinner table."

      Ummmm, it says here that it was grown in soil high in magnesium sulfate, used 5kwh to grow and get here, was stored at 45F, and was in shipping container X458GDFR. That's great. Assuming the data isn't bogus, what the hell do I do with that? Now I've lost my appetite.

      Computers will also be able to compare your health data to an ocean's worth of other patient records, helping with diagnosis and treatment, the company said.

      You appear to have a 95% match to pancreatic cancer and a 0% match to any cure.

  • by Darkforge ( 28199 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:02PM (#21825970) Homepage
    Looks like they've got four more years to make these come true:
    http://www.ibm.com/ibm/ideasfromibm/us/five_in_five/010807/index.shtml [ibm.com]
    • We will be able to access healthcare remotely, from just about anywhere in the world
    • Real-time speech translation -- once a vision only in science fiction -- will become the norm
    • There will be a 3-D Internet
    • Technologies the size of a few atoms will address areas of environment importance
    • Our mobile phones will come close to reading our minds
    • It's gotta be hard to come up with 5 year predictions that are both sensational enough to print and yet still plausible within 5 years. If you had to make a list with perfect hindsight that they could have done 5 years ago, what would you have on it?
    • When did IBM start making these 5-year predictions? I'd like to see 2002's predictions. They probably predicted flying cars.
    • Real-time speech translation
      As in Babelfish combined with speech recognition and syntisizing?

      For some reason I see this leading to a series of very confusing diplomatic incidents.
    • Hey dude, it's here already
      • We will be able to access healthcare remotely, from just about anywhere in the world
        -- i get get-a-bigger-penis pill commercials every day, everywhere, from everywhere, and this is healthcare, kind of
      • Real-time speech translation -- once a vision only in science fiction -- will become the norm
        -- i call over skype with my girlfriend, and i don't understand anything, something gets lost in the translation ...
      • There will be a 3-D Internet
  • oh please... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by apodyopsis ( 1048476 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:02PM (#21825972)
    ..spare me this drivel.

    somebody please give me an example of why I should ever want to control my dishwasher from my phone or my web browser.

    the only intelligence I want in my gadgets it on the lines of smart machines that can detect the load and vary the power consumption and resource usage accordingly. possibly the only interaction I would want is a little minimalist chime to alert me that the cycle or current operation has finished and some human interaction is needed.

    *everything* else should work behind the scenes to my benefit to save power or alert me when the washing powder is running low.

    interaction by web browser? what utter rot. I would say "whatever next, a fridge with a built in web browser?" but I remember talk of such stuff a few years ago...

    • Lets just hope we have the option to turn external communication off.
    • one thing i would like in my nifty smart dishwasher is a light bulb.

      most of my other kitchen appliances have a light that illuminates the interior when the door is open and i'd like one for my dishwasher too, kthxbai.
    • by glwtta ( 532858 )
      somebody please give me an example of why I should ever want to control my dishwasher from my phone or my web browser.

      I would love to be able to do that! Of course I'm assuming I will also be able to collect my dirty dishes off the living room floor, drag them to the kitchen, and load the said dishwasher, all from my browser.

      Otherwise, it seems kinda useless...
    • "somebody please give me an example of why I should ever want to control my dishwasher from my phone or my web browser."

      MMmmm well I have a suggestion. If the devices in my house were to measure their power usage, then connect via wi-fi to the net, I could use my browser to figure out which appliance(s) is/are costing me the most per month.

      That may not entice you much, but I've had roommates that didn't think they were the cause of the expensive utilities.
    • exactly. When i want to turn my dishwasher on is just after i have finished filling it. It is far more convenient to press the start button on the machine than to go and find my laptop. As for powering down, it should do that once it's finished, simple.

      the only intelligence I want in my gadgets it on the lines of smart machines that can detect the load and vary the power consumption and resource usage accordingly

      fisher and paykel have been making washing machines like that for decades.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      interaction by web browser? what utter rot. I would say "whatever next, a fridge with a built in web browser?" but I remember talk of such stuff a few years ago...

      Unfortunately, that dark day is basically here. [lge.com] We can be a pretty absurd species, that's for sure. What we really need are Bluetooth enabled underwear, then they could let our cellphones know when we sh*t ourselves. Or maybe scissors with routers, that would also be nice.

  • by tacocat ( 527354 ) <tallison1&twmi,rr,com> on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:10PM (#21826032)

    I don't think there will be that much interest in smart appliances like they describe. I think this is a technological path to consider, but it will be over ruled by the fact that we, as a planet, are running out of per capita energy.

    We may be able to create a lot of energy, but the per capita demand worldwide is growing such that Americans (who consume more energy per capita) will experience a severe energy shortage and as such, the focus will not be on more appliances that are smart and therefore have a passive load on the household grid, but focus on appliances that actually stop using all electricity when you turn them off. Many don't these days because of the hot start design features.

    For the rest of this decade the US will experience energy shortages in terms of higher gasoline prices, higher heating gas prices, and higher electricity prices (and summer shortages). This will force us to reconsider a lot of the appliances that we already have and re-prioritize what we want in future appliances.

    • You have it backwards. Appliances are resource hungry largely because they are dumb. You have lights and air conditioners running hour after hour because they don't know nobody is home. You have sprinklers going because their owners don't know how much water to use for the region given recent and predicted weather patterns. You have a refrigerator with the compressor running constantly because it's too dumb to know its door is ajar, or its coils are dirty, and it has no way to tell anybody what is wro
  • "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
  • RFC 3251 (Score:3, Funny)

    by pv2b ( 231846 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:21PM (#21826106)
    Does anybody know whether it's going to be compatible with RFC 3251 Electricity over IP [ietf.org]?

    Anybody wanting to develop a smart electricity grid should take a look at that document, includes lots of information about hazardous voltage drops and other pitfalls that can be avoided.
  • by psychicninja ( 1150351 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:41PM (#21826194)
    FTA:

    In effect, doctor's will gain superpowers - technologies will allow them to gain x-ray like vision to view medical images; super sensitive hearing to find tiniest audio clue in your heart beat;
    So... doctors will have the heretofore unheard of power of the X-Ray and stethoscope. Truly a new day is dawning!
  • WHY?? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by YrWrstNtmr ( 564987 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @09:51PM (#21826246)
    "Dishwashers, air conditioners, house lights, and more will be connected directly to a 'smart' electric grid, making it possible to turn them on and off using your cell phone or any Web browser,"

    If I am out...why in the hell do I want to take time to manage all my household appliances? I am 'out' for a reason. Presumably to have fun. Other than that, I am at home or work.

    Heat and A/C? Nope, sorry. Either maintain a constant temp, or follow the damn program I already gave you.
    Dishwasher? Oh please. If it's full enough, I'll start it now. Empty it whenever. Or maybe I'll start it just before I go to bed.
    House lights? Again...follow the (individual) timers, or just stay off. Simple, cheap, pretty foolproof.

    What possibly would I need to change settings on if I am 'out'. About the only thing I can think of that I might want to alter is the TiVo settings. Which I can do already. And that is (for me) a non issue. In two(three?) years, I haven't found a need to do it once.
    • by jrumney ( 197329 )

      What possibly would I need to change settings on if I am 'out'.

      Coming back from holiday is the main use case I can see, where you want to set the heating low while you are away, or turn off aircon in summer, then turn it up just before you come back. The other use case would be for people with irregular hours, for whom timers don't offer the flexibility they need.

      • My current programmable thermostat does that. Ok...only 7 day blocks at a time. But if gone for several weeks, I could set it to low, and come 'up' every Sunday (or whatever my return day is). Reprogram when I get back.

        But the end to end infrastructure needed to allow me to reprogram my climate control via web or phone, for a maybe once a year instance, is way beyond what I want to do. Or pay for.
    • Smart Grid?? Does it mean another Enron can bill Grandma-on-welfare $13 per KwH in a smart non-criminal way?
      Whenever these tech companies look into the crystal ball they see stuff that never ceases to amaze me.
      And this is from the same company which said the world needs probably 5 computers.

  • "smart energy" devices? I prefer "dumb" energy devices where they are really off instead of the standby crap they have now. Standby is mostly broken now anyways, the whole point of standby on TVs was that you could use your remote and open the TV and start channel surfing immediately. Now because everything is more complex I have to wait for my TV to "boot" up for a few seconds first. The only difference between this and having the TV starting from a "cold" start is that I waste energy when it's off.
  • No, this is good... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ed 'g3' ( 231005 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @10:11PM (#21826342) Journal
    for some functions, central heating being the main one. Setting off home early? Log in and get the place warmed up. Getting back late? Log in to postpone the warm up cycle. Go one step further and tie the location of your gps-enabled car / mobile phone / wristwatch etc to CH behaviour so as to have it off or frost proof setting when you're a long way away, to have it full on when you're in the house or on an established route such as commuting back from the office and drop to background heat at other times. Each person in the house would need the phone / wristwatch / implant though! And not much point in the summer. But it'd be useful for anyone who comes and goes at irregular times, who (therefore) can't program a timer to keep heating optimally efficient.
  • Riiight (Score:4, Insightful)

    by mqduck ( 232646 ) <mqduck@@@mqduck...net> on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @10:24PM (#21826442)

    Even the act of eating will take on new meaning, in IBM's view: "You will know everything from the climate and soil the food was grown in, to the pesticides and pollution it was exposed to, to the energy consumed to create the product, to the temperature and air quality of the shipping containers it traveled through on the way to your dinner table."
    Will such information increase sales or revenue to producers? No. Will it hurt? Quite possibly.
    Will producers make such information available? It shouldn't take a genius to answer this question.
    • >> "You will know everything from the climate and soil the food was
      >> grown in, to the pesticides and pollution it was exposed to, to
      >> the energy consumed to create the product, to the temperature
      >> and air quality of the shipping containers it traveled through
      >> on the way to your dinner table."
      >
      > Will such information increase sales or revenue to producers ?

      Yes it will ! Differenciation is what make a product stand out
      from the lot. This has already begun to happen in a
  • From a company that gave us Office Vision. That worked really well.
    • Yep, IBM should probably just stick to things like semiconductor process improvements, one place where they've actually been extremely successful. The closer they get to end-users, the more they seem to do really dumb stuff.
  • by Ralph Spoilsport ( 673134 ) on Wednesday December 26, 2007 @10:59PM (#21826632) Journal
    From TFA:

    he company said that during the next five years, a "wave of connectivity" between vehicles and roadways will help keep traffic flowing smoothly, drive down pollution and get you to your destination easier, "without the stress."

    This will be accomplished through "intelligent" traffic systems that automatically adjust light patterns and shift traffic to alternative routes, as well as cars that exhibit "reflexes" thanks to communication with other vehicles and roadside sensors, according to IBM.

    Utter and catastrophic bullshit. Those features MIGHT be available in 5 years, but the stupid bint up the street who just bought tha gas guzzling Caddilac SUV is NOT going to be getting one in five years. She will likely still be driving the gas guzzling POS Caddy. And I will DEFINITELY still be driving my Prius. And my brother is going tobe buying a new car next year, and it will likely be a used Ford. He ALWAYS buys used Fords.

    Essentially, for that technology to have ANY penetration in 5 years, it needs to have been made available last year or the year before. It takes an average of 10 years to replace 75% of the car fleet. This does NOT bode well given the petroleum situation....

    RS

  • Living in a rural area I have heard stories about people with their remote controlled homes starting up the furnace or whatever remotely in order to have the house toasty when they arrive. The problem with that is the critters who decided to nest on said furnace, or the broken gas hose, etc. so when Mr. and Mrs. tech get home they are greeted by the smoldering remains.
  • It seems like most of the comments so far are against the idea of having machines you can control via the web or your phone and I too don't see the point of having web access to my laundry machine or my dishwasher (well, my hypothetical dishwasher).

    But I live in Japan and that means a few things; I rely heavily on my cellphone to get things done. Internet, mail, news, weather, etc. Moreover, my apartment, like most Japanese housing, doesn't have central heat. Instead I rely on a (admittedly reasonably hig
  • by XNormal ( 8617 ) on Thursday December 27, 2007 @04:34AM (#21827900) Homepage
    Smart homes with remotely controlled appliances have featured in predictions for about 20 years now. Always about 5 years out.

    I predict they will remain in the prediction lists for the next 20 years.
  • For the love of god, PLEASE link directly next time! Why are the editors allowing this stuff?
  • by Greg_D ( 138979 ) on Thursday December 27, 2007 @08:45AM (#21828604)
    Connected together with a switch to turn them all off. Turn off the lights and TV in any room and look around at all the nice little glowing LEDs that are shining back at you. There's no f'n reason whatsoever for those things to still be consuming electricity, yet they run 24/7 whether they are "on" or not. Want to conserve energy? Fix that first and THEN deal with smart appliances.
  • This is the future, being able to turn on a fucking dishwasher from anywhere in the world? I was supposed to have a flying car years ago. Where the fuck is it?

    I want my goddamn flying car!!!!!

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...