Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Software IT

Office 2003 Service Pack Disables Older File Formats 555

time961 writes "In Service Pack 3 for Office 2003, Microsoft disabled support for many older file formats. If you have old Word, Excel, 1-2-3, Quattro, or Corel Draw documents, watch out! They did this because the old formats are 'less secure', which actually makes some sense, but only if you got the files from some untrustworthy source. Naturally, they did this by default, and then documented a mind-bogglingly complex workaround (KB 938810) rather than providing a user interface for adjusting it, or even a set of awkward 'Do you really want to do this?' dialog boxes to click through. And of course because these are, after all, old file formats ... many users will encounter the problem only months or years after the software change, while groping around in dusty and now-inaccessible archives."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Office 2003 Service Pack Disables Older File Formats

Comments Filter:
  • by User 956 ( 568564 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @01:32AM (#21879622) Homepage
    many users will encounter the problem only months or years after the software change, while groping around in dusty and now-inaccessible archives.

    Is that how one interfaces with rarely-used document archives? via groping?
  • That's why (Score:1, Funny)

    by Smordnys s'regrepsA ( 1160895 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @01:49AM (#21879716) Journal
    I only use software I coded myself, of hardware I've built myself, out of metals I've mined and smelted myself, etc...


    Well, thank god we're all so worried about security! Now those "unsecure" files as so secure, not even the author can read them!
  • Revenge (Score:5, Funny)

    by The Clockwork Troll ( 655321 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @01:54AM (#21879740) Journal
    I am the maintainer of Visicalc. This means war.

    Think Visicalc 26 service pack 3 is going to import Multiplan files?

    Think again, bitches.
  • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @02:15AM (#21879840)
    Is that how one interfaces with rarely-used document archives? via groping?

    Bender: If by "interface" you mean "have sex with" and if by "rarely-used document archive" you mean "your girlfriend", then yes, "groping" is the correct term. As follows:

    Hey baby, can I interface with your rarely-used document interface?
    Later, want to kill all humans?
  • by dbIII ( 701233 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @03:10AM (#21880054)

    Is that how one interfaces with rarely-used document archives? via groping?

    That's assuming they date back to the Clinton admistration. In California this approach will be required for current documents.

  • by ScrewMaster ( 602015 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @03:17AM (#21880080)
    In other words, their lips moved.
  • by harlows_monkeys ( 106428 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @03:19AM (#21880090) Homepage

    Most students, business and personal users don't wish to be unable to open their 10 year old document because it's no longer supported. Students want to be able to access old study notes

    If a student has been held back that long, the old notes are probably not going to help!

  • by Actually, I do RTFA ( 1058596 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @03:57AM (#21880220)

    Software? I use pen and paper to do all the hex calculations and use a morse code key to write to the hard drive. But, I suppose if you are going to trust a machine where anyone can break into your home and change the code on it, then you deserve the lack of security that leads to.

  • by Heir Of The Mess ( 939658 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @04:03AM (#21880236)

    Reminds me of this story:

    With nearly half a century of experience using computers to run their business, Chris M's company knew that law all too well. Ever since that fateful Wednesday -- still known throughout the company as The Crash of '68 -- they swore, Never Again. And forty years later, they've kept their promise.

    Over the years, Chris's employer has come as close to a Perfect Technology Infrastructure as anyone. They hire the best network administrators money can buy and give them whatever resources they need to ensure that the infrastructure remains solid. And that they do.

    The company's backup and retention plan is nothing short of immaculate. Every system they've ever purchased -- from that old payroll program on the System/360 to that bizarre parts database for OS/2 -- can be brought back to life, if not physically than through virtualization. A walk through their "software archive" was a treat for many; new technicians are often astonished to learn, not only of the existence of 8-inch floppy disks, but that the company still has the 8-inch install disks for CP/M. And a drive to run them on.

    Naturally, thanks to the aforementioned Murphy's Law, this elaborate backup and retention is rarely, if ever, called into use. The only excitement the network technicians ever get is that occasional, frantic, "Oh Crap! I accidentally deleted that critical PowerPoint presentation" call. And even that is easily solved by walking the user through their self-service file restoration system.

    But a little while back, the network technicians received a restoration request that actually sounded interesting. A production manager needed a report of the "old old" part numbers for a long out-of-production assembly. "Old old" referred an ancient mainframe system that had been replaced by the "old" system over ten years go and finally shut down in 2001. Restoring the "old old" system meant setting up a new emulation environment, mounting the old disk image, and praying that it boots up without a hitch.

    This was the first time ever that an actual user had requested such a restoration, so the network technicians were naturally a bit nervous. But thanks to their meticulous planning and procedures, everything went fine. The system booted up without a hitch and the production manager was summoned to log in to the terminal they had set up for him. He sat down at the chair, keyed in his username, and then paused for a moment.

    "Now, what was my password five years ago?"

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @04:26AM (#21880344)
    Helldesk_Hound, your account appears to have been taken over by a 7 year old. Maybe if you get in touch with slashdot they'll reset your password so you can get it back?
  • by mrjb ( 547783 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @04:49AM (#21880420)
    > Is that how one interfaces with rarely-used document archives? via groping?
    Yes, didn't you know? You should have RTFM:

    GROPE

    NAME

                  grope, egrope, fgrope, rgrep - print lines matching a pattern
                  in rarely used document archives

    SYNOPSIS

                  grope (options) PATTERN (FILE...)

    DESCRIPTION

                  grope searches the named archives FILEs (or standard input if none are
                  named, or the file name - is given) for lines containing a match to the
                  given PATTERN. By default, grope prints the matching lines.

                  In addition, three variant programs egrope, fgrep and rgrep are avail-
                  able. egrep is the same as grope -E. fgrope is the same as
                  grope -F. rgrope is the same as grope -r.

    BUGS

                  Backreferences are very slow, and may require exponential time.
  • by User 956 ( 568564 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @05:33AM (#21880584) Homepage
    Thank you Microsoft for demonstrating why we need ODF.

    For ultimate data portability, I prefer MDF.

    And a chisel.
  • Re:Revenge (Score:3, Funny)

    by lysse ( 516445 ) on Wednesday January 02, 2008 @12:04PM (#21882740)
    Well, at least the world is now safe from the arbitrary execution of 6502 machine code.

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...