Australia's Geekiest Man 256
An anonymous reader writes "Why have a key to open your front door when you can have an RFID tag implanted in your arm that will do the trick? Computerworld has a story up about the outgoing Linux Australia group president's hacked home, in which just about anything from watering the lawn, to opening his blinds, or checking the mail can be controlled through a software environment. Jonathan Oxer is an electronics and coding whiz who apparently has an RIFD tag implanted in his arm that opens his front door, and his front gate is hooked up with gigabit Ethernet — able to tell him when someone enters the property or send him a virtual email or sms to say he has real mail. Apparently the iPod Touch has just inspired him to begin linking all his little hardware hacks together into the one single, software controlled handheld touch device. I wonder if Steve Jobs ever thought the Touch would end up being used this way?"
Pretty damn cool (Score:5, Insightful)
Excessive? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Cancerous Police state much? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why? By definition, people who are obscenely rich have lots and lots of money, which is a far more effective way to manipulate people than RFID tags. Come on, really, do you picture the super-rich saying, "man, what I'd really like is to be able to implant electronics into the working class so I can watch their every move"? They're rich. They have yachts, and private aircraft, and small islands, and can do anything they want with their lives... do you really think they give a shit about what time Joe Sixpack staggers home with some drunken bar skank?
Re:Cancerous Police state much? (Score:5, Insightful)
That being said, I'm also in no hurry to have any tracking devices implanted in me either.
Re:Then again (Score:5, Insightful)
Favor me with a short answer (Score:5, Insightful)
This means that the tags themselves cannot do any encryption at all.
If this is the case, why the hell would anybody want to use it to gain secure access to anything when anybody nearby the tag with an RFID reader can read the serial number and spoof the tag?
This would be like writing your credit card number on the front of your shirt -
Is my understanding flawed, here? Are there newer RFID tags that actually can do crypto (and are people like those in TFA using them)? I may be wrong in any number of ways, so I'm looking for some more solid info.
Oh - good, only 1-2 of every 100 people get cancer (Score:1, Insightful)
I'm not taking those odds. There's roughly 300 million people in the US. If we gave them all implants and the same percentage of people got cancer that's 30 to 60 MILLION people!
No Science, Silly Math (Score:5, Insightful)
No, I said the OP claimed a HUGE percentage got cancer when in fact they don't. Secondly there was no research done on humans, and mice are not humans.
The fact that 1-2% could even possibly get cancer does not mean 30-60 million people will get it. Science is a bit more advanced than that. I'm not giving you any credit for your math skills. In fact it's probably unlikely they will get cancer at all from this "potential" threat. You are just making outrageous claims from no evidence what so ever.
I would take those odds, they're really quite good, but I don't want to be tagged none the less.
Re:Virtual email? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Then again (Score:3, Insightful)
The button is on the door handle and works both ways. press once to unlock twice to unlock them all, if unlocked one press will lock them alll.
For all RFID systems it shouldn't be all automatic there should still be a physical aspect to work with to unlock the item, even as simple as a button press increases security.
Oh and my car is nothing fancy just a Nissan Sentra.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Then again (Score:5, Insightful)
If handguns are to work at all to deter assault or robbery, a reasonably high percentage of the general population has to be packing. Unfortunately when there are that many guns floating around it's likely the assailant / robber has one too and all you've done is increased the chances of somebody getting killed rather than just mugged or robbed.
In the end I'm not sure I buy the idea that handguns deter crime significantly anyway. Even if they did, given the rate at which they're used to inflict grievous harm by angry spouses, stupid children playing with them, and homeowners spooked by noises shooting themselves in the foot at night, I don't think having handguns distributed into society actually works to reduce overall human suffering.
Re:Then again (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not to rain on anyone's parade (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Virtual email? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:RFID? (Score:2, Insightful)
his ideal situation... (Score:3, Insightful)
So... his ideal situation (which he hasn't actually manage to achieve yet) is to do something that the security systems in most apartment buildings have been doing for decades.