Wikileaks Publishes FBI VoIP Surveillance Docs 145
An anonymous reader writes "The folks on wikileaks have published a new interesting and shocking report: FBI Electronic Surveillance Needs for Carrier-Grade Voice over Packet (CGVoP) Service.
The 88 paged document, which is part of the CALEA Implementation Plan was published in January 2003 and describes in detail all needs for surveillance of phone calls made via data services like the internet.
Wikileaks has not published any analysis yet, so maybe some of the techies hanging around this end of the internet are interested in taking that one on."
Re:paradigm shift (Score:5, Insightful)
Encrypted (Score:2, Insightful)
use smartphones.. use encrypted voip to make all the phone calls, and use the regular service provider to make emergency calls like 911
I think this is the way to go..
I know some one will say there are attacks possible on encrypted connections... but the question is that its not feasible to attack every connection out there.. atleast make their job as difficult as possible.
Re:paradigm shift (Score:5, Insightful)
So yes, Obama is a better pick on individual rights than either of the alternatives.
Whether it will be a huge difference, or whether he will remain true to this, noone can be sure. As in life, there are no guarantees in politics.
Re:paradigm shift (Score:5, Insightful)
Take the free software movement as an example... the movement isn't ruled by anyone, the society of human individuals (programmers) can license their work any way they like, but they _choose_ to push for freedom on to others.
Those who are free to choose are not ruled.
Re:paradigm shift (Score:5, Insightful)
Surveillance of public servants and surveillance of the general populace aren't even remotely similar.
Re:Congratulations... (Score:5, Insightful)
Words not found in pdf with a quick search (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:paradigm shift (Score:3, Insightful)
You would rather have police locked in a room with someone and walk out with a supposedly signed confession disposition when a videotape would have proved it forged? Say what you want about "serve and protect", there are good cops, but it's the bad cops that ruin things for the rest of us.
Re:paradigm shift (Score:2, Insightful)
I think that one fits too.
It's routine Big Brother stuff (Score:4, Insightful)
There's not much new here. If you're familiar with CALEA, the law that hooked the Government into the phone system big-time, this is basically the same set of requirements the FBI wanted for voice calls. There was a big disagreement in the voice world over in-band signalling. The question was whether a "pen register" warrant authorized access to signalling data that goes over the voice channel, like Touch-Tone tones sent to some non-carrier device. The FBI was bitching about that for years.
The trouble with all this stuff is that Congress didn't mandate proper auditing. Every surveillance event in CALEA ought to be logged by the Judicial Branch, at the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. [uscourts.gov] We don't have that.
Re:Words not found in pdf with a quick search (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:PGPfone, where are you? (Score:1, Insightful)
As long as we have governments that routinely want to invade our privacy, our routine conversations should make it very costly for them to do so.
Anyone who uses encryption now attracts attention whether it is warranted or not. The only way to allow those who wish to protect their privacy the ability to do it without opening them up to scrutiny is to raise the background so that they disappear.
Anyone who has information they really need to protect also knows ways to not only encrypt but to hide and conceal the communications (steganography, etc).
I just want to see the invasion of privacy by intrusive and paranoid administrations stopped. Make them call a spade a spade. As long as they can just tap in and monitor everyone in secret and using simple technology, they will. By upping the effort and making them come out of their closet to demand keys, passwords, etc, or to demand people not encrypt, it will blow their cover and allow the general public to see what kind of monster is lurking among us.
If at least some of the programmers on various projects would steer them to make encryption the default, they might just save a country.
And I realize some mechanism would be required to allow standard communications applications to intercommunicate but that could also be the cue to users to upgrade to versions that use encryption.
Re:Encrypted (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:chesting (Score:3, Insightful)
"Privacy" as discussed here is about protecting privacy from the government, to whom we pay taxes and who might imprison us, prosecute us, or target us for our beliefs, words, or affiliations. Privacy from the general public is a different issue. Please argue that issue elsewhere as it confuses (and is probably intentionally meant to confuse) the real issue of privacy with regards to the government. If you still don't understand, I'll repeat it in bold face: "Privacy" as discussed here is about protecting privacy from the government.
Don't play or be dumb and confuse the issues.