ODF Editor Says ODF Loses If OOXML Does 268
An anonymous reader writes "The editor of the Open Document Format standard has written a letter (PDF) that strongly supports recognizing Microsoft's OOXML file format as a standard, arguing that if it fails, ODF will suffer. 'As the editor of OpenDocument, I want to promote OpenDocument, extol its features, urge the widest use of it as possible, none of which is accomplished by the anti-OpenXML position in ISO,' Patrick Durusau wrote. 'The bottom line is that OpenDocument, among others, will lose if OpenXML loses... Passage of OpenXML in ISO is going to benefit OpenDocument as much as anyone else.'"
Re:3 questions... (Score:5, Funny)
We failed already (Score:4, Funny)
What kind of ODF editor is that then? (Score:5, Funny)
Great Shades of Miguel! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:4 possibilities (Score:2, Funny)
1) This guy works for a company that sold its soul to Microsoft in exchange for a useless patent agreement
2) This guy got a large quantity of money from Microsoft in the recent past
3) This guy got a large quantity of crack from Microsoft in the recent past and consumed it
4) Going by the date in the letter (March 24) they released the letter 8 days early
Remember, friends don't let friends post without using preview
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Don't fully understand his arguments (Score:5, Funny)
Ahhhh young grasshopper, to understand his logic and arguments one must first understand the The Time Cube. [timecube.com]
-
Mystery Men and PDF (Score:2, Funny)
What's the point of a superhero if there is no evil overlord?
One should point out that a significant majority of documentation out there is already final and should be non-editable.
PDF is already the defacto standard for this. So presently, OO can easily produce a PDF of a document which can be read by almost anyone. Any MS doc could be converted to PDF by proprietary software. So PDF is the common document format.
It's only when a document has to be edited by a number of collaborators, using different WP and OS that some kind of standard is required. Again, for the most part, the edited document is finalised and can be made into a PDF.
Now practically, typesetting machines can read a text document that is pre-tagged, so it understands font face, size, chapter number, paragraphs, quotes etc etc - and this is all done in plain text. No mystery here at all.
The battle between ODF and docx is the battle between MS and the rest of the world.
ODF should win, simply because it is monopolistic to force anyone to purchase software to view and edit what amounts to be public domain texts.
Re:ODF editor on OOXML (Score:4, Funny)
Sure you can. It just costs extra to get it approved.
OOXML, the standard the best money can buy.
-
Re:3 questions... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How this kind of thing works - Soft Bribery (Score:2, Funny)
OT: STOP PLEASE STOP! (Score:2, Funny)
GAH! I can't take it any more! You don't make a word plural by adding an apostrophe "s"! Unleash the dogs of war. Every man's destiny. CPAs make up their formulas! Is that so bloody hard?! I see otherwise intelligent, educated people making this mistake more and more often, and I'm terrified that it will become accepted. The other day, I caught myself doing it -- now I lie awake at night, afraid to sleep for I know that the "'s"es will return in my dreams.
So, uh, right. Sorry about that, had to get it off my chest. Carry on.