BBC and ISPs Clash over iPlayer 350
randomtimes writes "A row about who should pay for extra network costs incurred by the iPlayer has broken out between internet service providers (ISPs) and the BBC. ISPs say the on-demand TV service is putting strain on their networks, which need to be upgraded to cope. '"The iPlayer has come along and made downloading a legal and mass market activity," said Michael Phillips, from broadband comparison service broadbandchoices.co.uk. He said he believed ISPs were partly to blame for the bandwidth problems they now face. "They have priced themselves as cheaply as possible on the assumption that people were just going to use e-mail and do a bit of web surfing," he said. ISPs needed to stop using the term 'unlimited' to describe their services and make it clear that if people wanted to watch hours of downloaded video content they would have to pay a higher tariff, he added.'"
Re:Amen (Score:3, Informative)
I am suscribed to the cheapest package (which costs £18 per month, none less) and can't imagine the anger of guys paying for the more expensive offers and then finding they can only download 350 MB per hour before being limited to 50Kbps download...
But the real problem is that of the power of corporations against the simple guy. A similar type of abuse happens with airlines like Ryanair or Easyjet. Just try to get a refund for your ticket, and according to their policies they will only refund the tax... but guess what? if you actually contact them for the tax (it does not matter if it is about £150 ) they will say that the "administration fees" are higher than the tax they would return to you and hence they won't give you anything.
Oh well, the wonders of capitalism.
Re:Why isn't it treated lake any other utility? (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.shaplus.com/bandwidth-meter/index.htm/ [shaplus.com]
Re:Marketing isn't the problem (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why isn't it treated lake any other utility? (Score:2, Informative)
The people who waste bandwidth on them by not installing something like adblock.
Re:Amen (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Caching not a solution (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Marketing isn't the problem (Score:2, Informative)
Not accurate at all. The BBC simply suggested that content providers should publicly name ISPs who block or impede content so consumers could vote with their wallets, and that was after an extensive post about how both sides could manage the network strain:
What was actually said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/ashley_highfield/ [bbc.co.uk]
Re:Common Sense is asking too much... (Score:3, Informative)