Dell Will Offer XP Past Cutoff Date 351
Dionysius, God of Wine and Leaf, brings news that Dell will be offering Windows XP pre-installed on their computers past the June 30 cut-off date. Computers purchased with Vista Business or Vista Ultimate past June 30 will come with a copy of XP Pro. Dell plans to simply install that copy upon request to save users a step. Perhaps this will help Microsoft officials make up their minds about another extension.
Submitter diversity (Score:5, Informative)
Re:People still BUY Windows? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:2, Informative)
Here in the Gov 'o' Canada we are just starting to migrate to XP.
A lot of US Defense is just migrating to XP as well...
We have our own Support staff, and any user that chooses XP over
"supported" Vista obviously has a support route or has abandoned
the parachute knowingly. Remember that this is "By request".
PS: I'll have the porterhouse
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:5, Informative)
XP has support into 2014. Wiki. [wikipedia.org]
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:2, Informative)
It's my understanding that the only thing changing as of June 30 is that Microsoft is going to stop selling XP. XP will be supported until something like 2014, IIRC.
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:1, Informative)
I work for Dell as a Prosupport Agent, and I get all kinds of software calls that we try our best to fix for people. 90% of the time they start out the call with "I called Microsoft and they said to call you..."
I don't mind those. I accept that Microsoft has gotten away with pushing support away from them to cut costs for so long that it's a given.
It's the "I called my ISP and they said that the DSL modem is connecting, and to call you to fix my Internet" calls that really grill my bacon. Seriously, your L1s can't even do netsh int ip reset log.txt or basic TCP/IP T/S? (Ping, check gateway, etc)? Seriously, what's the problem guys?
XP MCE Anyone (Score:4, Informative)
So is Dell offering MCE as well still?
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:5, Informative)
I applaude this decision and will do my best to support them if they continue selling XP.
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:2, Informative)
I remember, once, doing L2 support, where I got a caller who'd called in with the same difficulty four times and was finally escalated. The first tech had picked the wrong "resolution," and the next three had blindly followed the same wrong set of instructions without ever asking themselves why it would work this time. Clearly, they all suffered from the Bullwinkle syndrome. I, OTOH, looked at what had happened, realized that they'd gone off in the wrong direction and did something that not only was different, but was The Right Thing. In fact, what I did what what should always have been the L1 tech's first line of attack. (I went through the network settings and corrected them instead of removing and replacing Dial-Up Networking Yet Again.)
Re:Why do people still want this OS? (Score:1, Informative)
Expressdigital Darkroom (used for tethering and for controlling a fuji frontier) only supports XP or OSX.
So, essentially, until the software and hardware that we use is supported by vista, we will use XP and OSX.
Re:Activation? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Outlook? You must be crazy. (Score:3, Informative)
Mactrope [slashdot.org] (clever play on Macthorpe [slashdot.org])
gnutoo [slashdot.org]
inTheLoo [slashdot.org]
Erris [slashdot.org] (oldest one)
willeyhill [slashdot.org] (the joke's on me)
westbake [slashdot.org] (clever play on westlake [slashdot.org]).
Hard to keep up.
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:If they won't sell it, we'll steal it. (Score:4, Informative)
Trademarks are slightly different, but you have not framed the issue in the correct manner. It's not the non-use of a trademark that itself causes problems, but rather the failure to defend against others making use of it. You can sit on an unused trademark (say, the "Fairlane" name for Ford) if you might have use for it in the future or if it's a temporary gap in use (like when they retired the "Taurus" name for several years). As long as you prevent someone else from using it, it's not considered abandoned. Like copyright, abandonment is more than not using it. But abandonment and losing rights for failure to prosecute ("dilution") are distinct.
"Abandonware" still protected by copyright remains so. If you own a license already, the law allows you to take some otherwise unlawful means to continue using it once it has been abandoned by the manufacturer, but it does not allow you to sell or distribute it simply because the original company no longer chooses to.
The only place the law is really grey is if the company no longer exists AND no one purchased or was assigned the rights. There hasn't been an affirmative ruling on that to my knowledge, but there's a strong case that the copyright has lapsed if the holder and their estate/successor no longer exist.
Reading the Fine Print (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Outlook? You must be crazy. (Score:2, Informative)
The way this works... (Score:4, Informative)
If you buy Vista Business or Ultimate, you have the option to upgrade to XP Pro or Windows 2000 instead, this only requires you to have a single license install media for the older OS but it doesn't have to be unique.
So dell simply brought a 1 user mass license for XP and give it out with that nifty "pre activated" thing, to everyone who gets vista business.
This process was explained to me by a MS OEM sales rep, sounds stupid imho, why not just keep selling XP?
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:4, Informative)
The grand parent wasn't saying that was how he decided, but rather that is how companies decide. I agree with what you're trying to say, it is stupid for a company to buy into a worthless support contract because legally the software vendor is not responsible for any problems that occur or are they even responsible for providing a solution. Support contracts are basically there so you have a number to call and whine to when shit hits the fan, and when your boss comes around and asks "why isn't it working," you can say, "well it's proprietary software vendor's X's fault." Which sounds a little better than "it broke."
I know how useless support contracts are because we just canceled one. We had an annual "support" contract with an old and dying vendor with some old and dying software. One day we decided to actually talk to them to see if they could fix our issue. And their answer was "pay us more money and we *might* fix it." We replied "nevermind." A month later I figured out what the issue was after dumping their junk software into a test environment and playing with the inputs we had access to. Eventually I found that it had a shitty algorithm for doing something stupid and we happen to have data that ran into the algorithm's worst case run-time. Altered how the data was being fed and the problem went away. I saved the company ten's of thousands of dollars that day.
Next when it came time to renew our annual support contract with this vendor, we decided to not renew it because not only did we know they were trying to leech huge amounts of money from us, but we also had plans to eventually retire the aging system. Bam, thousands of dollars saved for the company again.
Don't think that MS is the only "bad guy" when it comes to "support" contracts. Every big software vendor does it and everyone makes sure to cover their butts. If you honestly think you can save your company a lot of money just by terminating support contracts and ensuring that you can take the responsibility for supporting the software then by all means do it. But there are some support contracts that I think are stupid, but others that I think are essential. The easy way to figure that out is if the system fails, and you can't bring it back up in a reliable amount of time, then you probably shouldn't take that responsibility because you'll probably lose your job.
Re:Ubuntu Instead? (Score:3, Informative)
Just keep in mind that the community has made service packs and shit for Windows 98 and it's all garbage, I tried both the usual sesp21 and the sesp30b and both made my system horribly unreliable.
If you have really reached the point where you are stuck with XP because Vista won't do the job, and you're not currently working on a project to switch your business from Windows to Linux or similar, then you are a sucker. Because Microsoft will just keep fucking you over.