Average Web Page Size Triples Since 2003 241
Andy King writes "Within the last five years, the size of the average web page has more than tripled, and the number of external objects has nearly doubled. While broadband users have experienced somewhat faster response times, narrowband users have been left behind." The article breaks down a number of changes besides just page size, including image types and video duration.
Check out the size of the /. front page. (Score:3, Interesting)
(Front Page?)
Times change (Score:1, Interesting)
!=haven't, rather == can't get (was Re:OMG !) (Score:3, Interesting)
Low bandwidth, flexible pages using CSS are also good for people on mobile units w/ small screens.
William
Re:Check out the size of the /. front page. (Score:5, Interesting)
The biggest thing I'd argue is that advertisements have gotten heavier over the years, with static images giving way to animated images giving way to flash objects.
Parkinson's Law hold true after 60 years (Score:5, Interesting)
Whatever next? Software expands to fill the hardware available....?
Re:Times change (Score:5, Interesting)
It might be extra work, might even be a pita, but 'unfeasible'? Most modern websites of any size separate content from presentation through some sort of content management system.
With a decent CMS it should be trivial to offer a 'light' version of your site - I think someone else mentioned the low graphics version of the BBC news site as an example.
It is possible that a lot of the content that is increasing page sizes are flash adverts - if I fire up internet explorer there seems to be an ever increasing number of these animated adverts (can folk actually read a web page with three animated adverts amongst the text?). I'd hazard a guess that the reason many sites don't offer light versions of their pages is the threat to revenue through decreased ad views and has very little to do with the complexity of serving up two variants of a website.
Re:Check out the size of the /. front page. (Score:3, Interesting)
I checked.
Around 75KB, down to 17KB with gzip compression.
Plus around 20KB in png/gifs.
Not that big.
Re:Arrgh! "Narrowband" used on slashdot! (Score:2, Interesting)
In a more technical sense in telecommunications, though broadband is divided into into channels, where baseband just has one signal over the maximum of the bandwidth of the medium. So while cable is a broadband technology and 100-base-TX is a baseband technology, 100-base-TX is of course, much, much faster than cable.
The opposite of 'narrowband' is 'wideband', which doesn't mean the same thing as 'broadband' despite the fact the 'wide' and 'broad' are synonyms.
Confused yet?
Re:Check out the size of the /. front page. (Score:3, Interesting)
Home movies have always sucked. And in HD they SUCK more. You see HD, even 1080i, requires you to pan slowly, limit zooming and other fast or shakey camera motions. now HD amplifies the careless shooting of the home video and makes people even more sick.
Honestly as a videographer I wish they required classes before people buy a camcorder. Either that or make the camera shock the user if it is tilted or moved too fast or if zoom is used when record is pressed.
My biggest complaint... (Score:3, Interesting)
It has however, benefited my pocket since many of the businesses who have had a site built by these morons come looking for someone to "make their sites work better." It does still amaze me that even in this day and age your average business still doesn't check the credentials or abilities of the people that they hire as programmers.
-Goran