Linux Desktop Distro Shootout 383
An anonymous reader writes "InfoWeek has posted an open-source OS comparison. Linux Shootout: 7 Desktop Distros Compared pits openSUSE, Ubuntu 8.4, PCLinuxOS, Mandriva Linux One, Fedora, SimplyMEPIS, and CentOS 5.1 against each other. And the winner is ... Ubuntu. Author Serdar Yegulalp writes: 'Ubuntu 8.4 remains one of the best desktop distributions for many good reasons: it works with almost any hardware you throw at it, and has tons of features for both existing Linux users and prospective converts from Windows.' He also gave openSUSE points for ease of use on the desktop, and Mandriva kudos for ease of administration."
8.4? (Score:5, Informative)
why CentOS? (Score:5, Informative)
Add free version. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:why CentOS? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu 8.04 (Score:4, Informative)
"Almost any hardware you throw at it" (Score:5, Informative)
I sincerely enjoy the Linux experience and appreciate the community, but this statement is positively absurd. Ubuntu's own help files [ubuntu.com] contain extensive lists of wireless cards that have a big fat "No" listed under the "Works out of the box" column. And that's just wireless cards.
One of the primary reasons that the average person abandons Linux is the frustration caused by these types of misleading claims. Somebody says, "Hey, virtually everything works out of the box!" and they think... wow, well, I buy my stuff at top retailers from top brands, surely then my stuff is supported.
Unfortunately for them, their stuff may not work at all, or may work partially. Lots of gotchas for Video cards [ubuntu.com], scanners [ubuntu.com].. the list goes on and on. Nobody is well served by making statements that indicate anything except that hardware support is still a major obstacle for the adoption of Linux on the desktop.
Why Mandriva One? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu 8.04 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu 8.04 (Score:5, Informative)
I find that it's as wise to wait for stability in an Ubuntu release as it is with an MS Windows release. The difference is that stability comes to Ubuntu faster. (o:
I will give Heron a month or two to settle down and then switch.
Ubuntu does more right than any other Linux distribution ever has.
Re:Add free version. (Score:3, Informative)
That said, Fedora 8 was tested, and the beta for Fedora 9 is currently in full-swing and will be released in 8 days [fedoraproject.org], so the comparison is slightly weighted (as all Linux desktop distribution comparisons tend to be) to the most recent release: Ubuntu in this case.
Re:why CentOS? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu 8.04 (Score:2, Informative)
The problem is that I can't use my old xorg.conf. xrandr has deprecated most of its functionality. But there's no way to remove xrandr or downgrade to the previous version of X. There's no information about this in the 8.04 release notes. There was no information period, except for a well-buried Ubuntu wiki page.
My bug report was thankfully triaged almost immediately (probably because Bryce recognised the problem from the heading) and I understand why they did it. But the lack of information is what bothered me most. I wouldn't have upgraded till 8.10 (when the functionality for more than two screens and more than one graphics card is supposed to be introduced into xrandr) if I had known my setup would break, or that there would be this amount of functional regression. And I'm fairly involved in the community (not the xrandr dev side of things of course). I had no idea.
Also PulseAudio has been no end of trouble for me. If I have to install nswrapper just to get sound with Flash, I consider that a major show-stopper.
That said, I'm not leaving Ubuntu. I am downgrading to 7.10 again (again!), and I'll be rather more careful about upgrading in the future.
Re:"Almost any hardware you throw at it" (Score:1, Informative)
http://linux.dell.com/wiki/index.php/Ubuntu_7.04#Dell_Remastered_Ubuntu_7.04_ISO
Dell releases CD versions tailored for the hardware they support under Ubuntu.
Re:"Almost any hardware you throw at it" (Score:4, Informative)
Re:"Almost any hardware you throw at it" (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Add free version. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Speeds & Feeds Perils (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Almost Any Hardware...? (Score:3, Informative)
On a side note, I would try to get away from buying computer parts from Best Buy. The options are limited, the prices high, and you always have some deusche salesmen trying to talk you into the more expensive card "cause it's teh r0x0rz!" even though it's completely wrong for your needs. I would drop by Newegg.com for great price, great shipping service, and huge selection.
Re:Almost Any Hardware...? (Score:2, Informative)
PCMCIA - Laptop (ATH0 drivers)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16839127003 [newegg.com]
PCI - Desktop (ATH0 drivers)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833127075 [newegg.com]
I have systems running these cards and just about every linux distro I tried found and configured them with no issues.
Re:Almost Any Hardware...? (Score:3, Informative)
I picked them up from an InkStop store, they usually have some in stock, at least here in Michigan.
It's not as easy to answer your question as it should be, because manufacturers sometimes change chipsets but don't change model numbers. For example, I have a desktop card, a DLink DWL-G520 (rev B), works fine with Linux. But the (rev B) is important - the (rev A) version has a totally different chipset.
Re:Add free version. (Score:4, Informative)
And "begs the question" doesn't mean "raises the question" or "ducks the issue". It refers to a specific form of argument which _does_, in fact, attempt to answer the question--but does so by assuming the conclusion in one of the premises. Specifically it's an argument of the form
p implies q
suppose p
-> q
Where "suppose p" really is "suppose my side of what we're arguing about is true".
Re:8.4? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:why CentOS? (Score:3, Informative)
What about it do you loathe? I've been using Linux off and on since pre 1.0 slackware, and pretty much constantly for the past five years; Ubuntu's the easiest to install and use out of the box that I've seen.
Granted, I've been only using Ubuntu for the last year, but 8.04 was the first version of any Linux distribution that recognized every single piece of hardware on my laptop during the install, I didn't have to configure a damn thing.
Now, I'm not trying to be a fanboy... I've used Mandrake (before it was Mandriva), Red Hat, slackware, CentOS (Maya won't run on Ubuntu, so I need to use CentOS at work). I just can't say that I've "loathed" any of them. Even when I had to install slackware with like 60 floppy disks.