OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta Released 390
Sean0michael writes "OpenOffice.org has announced their 3.0 Beta is ready for testing. The new version includes some great enhancements, including MS Office 2007 import filters, an improved notes feature, a built-in Solver component, and an Aqua interface for Macs. The site has a complete list of Beta features. Download your beta release from their site."
Re:Aqua (Score:4, Informative)
Looks like there is only an Intel version, no universal binary.
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
PDF Import Extension (Score:4, Informative)
" Available Soon... PDF Import Extension
The PDF Import Extension allows modifying existing PDF files for which the original source files do not exist anymore. "
However, that was August 2007 [sun.com].
Re:*STILL* no outline mode. (Score:5, Informative)
Lack of outline mode is bug nÂ3959 [openoffice.org] and if you had as much as skimmed its content you would know why it is taking longer to develop than you think it should.
Everyone agrees it is important, everyone is impatient, the developers know all about it, but it is not a trivial hack, so it will take resources and therefore time.
Re:Hang in there guys (Score:5, Informative)
I can open a word document with OO. I cannot open an OO document with Word.
I can open a Word Perfect document with OO. I cannot open a WP document with Word.
OO has the cool cachet of the GPL, while Word is just another boring corporate moneymaker.
OO has fewer bugs and faster bug fixes.
OO costs nothing, while stupid people pay good cash for Word that could otherwise be spent on more important things like beer, games, and more beer.
The only thing Word has going for it is that the Uncyclopedia parodies Bill Gates [uncyclopedia.org] (and even includes a real criminal justice system mug shot [uncyclopedia.org] of him) but not Scott McNealy [uncyclopedia.org]. I mean, if Uncyclopedia doesn't make fun of you your software must really suck, right?
Re:Still low limit on Calc rows? (Score:5, Informative)
We're querying data out of a database and trying to do simple processing on it (the type that Excel does very well) in the simplest ways we can, and present it to the bosses. Yes, I could write a Java program to subtotal all our payments by type and spit it out in some kind of elegant format, or we could spring for a dozen more Crystal Reports licenses, but the fact is that Excel does this just fine, and now we don't even have to use 6 worksheets within a workbook to hold it all.
I hate Microsoft, but I just have no way of recommending replacing Office with OpenOffice while this is an issue.
Oh, and by the way (not directed at you, but at the stuck-up git who wrote that quote, which I read, too): when someone says they have a reason to use more than X of something in your product, and all it would cost you to give it to them is (I think) changing the types of a bunch of variables, and maybe adding a couple of extra converter methods, you don't tell them, "No one should ever need that many! Only an idiot would even ask for that!" You either say, "Well, we don't currently have enough demand for that feature to be worth the trouble," or you just darn well do it!
Dan Aris
Re:Aqua (Score:5, Informative)
Ooooh! I want to be that douche bag!
Seriously, this is a great step forwards, but like most ports it is still seriously lacking in real functionality, especially when it comes to features that OS X offers, but other OS's do not. These include:
Please note. These don't mean OO.org sucks or the developers are lazy or anything else. It just means that there is a real usability and functionality concern when comparing a not quite polished port to a native application. One of the drawbacks of cross-platform applications (especially when they are not designed as cross-platform initially, but try to port to new platforms) is they tend to miss things and also tend to become a least common denominator when it comes to features. Windows and Linux don't have a universal grammar checker, so if you use OO.org on OS X (which does) it is ignored, despite being implemented by default in all native applications.
Re:Don't Hate! (Score:5, Informative)
And while sun does have the copyright, the community plays a role in the development process.
Furthermore, some other projects do use OO code, eg neooffice [wikipedia.org]
Re:Aqua (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Still low limit on Calc rows? (Score:3, Informative)
I agree that if you have 65k+ records or rows of data, a spreadsheet probably isn't the best tool.
However, there are several reasons why handling such data in Excel/OO is not unreasonable. These include:
So, the short answer is that if you have only think you have a hammer (Excel), everything starts looking like nails.
I tend to go to R [r-project.org] or Tableau [tableausoftware.com] (which is basically a nice interface that sits on top of a database, Excel file or flat file) when I have many thousands of records, but the former has a learning curve, and the latter isn't cheap.
Re:Aqua (Score:5, Informative)
http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/Dev_BEA300_m2/
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
Unless there is no OOo for PPC.
Re:Clones needed, references checked (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Hang in there guys (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Don't Hate! (Score:4, Informative)
Now, I have never contributed to OOo, so I can't speak for how they actually handle individual contributors. Many open source projects are not always very inviting to individual contributors, especially when their opinions differ from the core devs (see GNOME). But they certainly do accept code from others.
Re:Aqua (Score:1, Informative)
BFD. Much of the Mac UI, not to mention the rest of OS X, didn't originate with Apple either. And the similarities are only superficial: KDE is skinnable.
Apple rarely comes up with anything original.
Quicksilver has spawned a dozen clones.
Again, BFD. Hotkey command input has been around for a long time, too.
Reveal codes feature: Vote for it! (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395 [openoffice.org]
BTW: work has started on it.
Re:Hang in there guys (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
and on some torrent trackers.
I've installed it alongside 2.4 - it's a lot slower than 2.4 (so much so that it's close to unusable on my 1.5 Ghz G4), but it has the lifesaving feature of being able to open
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
I filed the first two years ago. I haven't filed any in a while because they don't have a bug report feature built into the program and to file bugs requires you to register an account, (including your personal info) with Sun.
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
It's actually fairly easy to write Cocoa apps that can be ported to Linux and the BSDs via GNUStep (it has a few extensions to Cocoa, but these can be installed on Macs without the rest of GNUStep). It doesn't support AppleScript, but Objective-C is part of GCC (which Apple themselves use), so there isn't any need to install extra compilers on Linux / BSD systems.
"Unfortunately, Apple refuses to support nice languages, like Python, Smalltalk, or C#"
Apple doesn't need to support everything itself. Here's a list of Cocoa bridges for all the languages you list, as well as various others you didn't mention:
http://www.cocoadev.com/index.pl?CocoaBridges [cocoadev.com]
"or nice APIs, in order to keep the Macintosh platform separate and proprietary"
Apple support POSIX, X-Windows, and OpenGL (to name but three), none of which is proprietary, and as as GNUStep proves, there's nothing preventing third parties from writing Cocoa-compatible systems for other platforms. After all, why should Apple do all the work when Open Source supporters keep telling the rest os to write stuff for ourselves if there isn't a FOSS solution that does what we want?
Re:Aqua (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Hang in there guys (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Aqua - LaunchD, etc... (Score:5, Informative)
LaunchD
Bonjour (Dynamic DNS Stuff (mDNS))
iCal Server
Thats just a few
Re:Aqua (Score:3, Informative)
FWIW OpenOffice.org started as the *proprietary* suite Staroffice, which was bought by Sun and open sourced.
Re:OOo *still* lacking some basic functionality (Score:2, Informative)
I'd love to pitch in with the coding, but I sadly cannot afford the time and energy required to dig through OOo's extraordinarily convoluted API documentation to figure out how to update the source code myself; I started the process, but gave up in disgust at how the docs are organized.
Wow, you actually found documentation? I tried writing an OO.o macro once. I have almost gotten back my sanity now. =)
But anyway, there's one part where OO.o differs from Word: Documents are not coupled to the application. You don't have to use OO.o to process OpenDocument.
Theoretically, it'd not be that difficult to whip up an external application that does various word count methods - after all, there's several word count methods for English too! (Some divide character count by six, some pick a page from the middle of the manuscript, multiply lines by average line length, then multiply by number of pages in manuscript, etc, etc...)
I've written a word count tool for my own use for LaTeX text myself in 15 minutes... and there's a bunch of libraries for parsing OO.o. How hard can it be? =)