Homemade VoIP Network Over Wi-Fi Routers 71
AnInkle writes "A blogger on The Tech Report details his research and testing of wireless voice communication options for remote mountainous villages in rural undeveloped areas. The home-built project involves open-source software, low-cost wireless routers, solar power, mesh networking, unlicensed radio frequencies and VoIP technology. Although his research began several months ago, he has concluded the first stage of testing and is preparing to move near one of the sites where he hopes to eventually install the final functional network. Anyone with experience or ideas on the subject is invited to offer input and advice."
Urban Networks... (Score:4, Insightful)
Why not cellular? (Score:4, Insightful)
Seems a bit like trying to use bluetooth to connect two buildings in a campus together - nominally cheap hardware, but probably cannot be coerced into doing what you seek.
Re:Why not cellular? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why not cellular? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why not cellular? (Score:1, Insightful)
Wifi you'd be using directional antennas from point to point. Even cell phones have lousy range with a stubby antenna and low power. The point is to use off the shelf wireless tec as a replacement for running land lines, not to build a wireless mobile phone system.
Re:Urban Networks... (Score:3, Insightful)
Gee, you think?
Re:Urban Networks... (Score:3, Insightful)
Al Qaeda NEVER uses electronic communications. They communicate face to face, always. No cell phones, no computers, no GPS, no mail, no land lines, nada. This is why I scream madly at every "homeland" security citation about encryption and internet use. They don't use anything of the sort. That's why we can't find them. That's why they got away. We're building a surveillance state that has no way of watching people riding horses in mountains, but does a bang-up job in keeping us from, oh, building a free hippyphone system using wifi.
Re:Urban Networks... (Score:3, Insightful)