China Buying US Directed Sound 'Weapon' 350
holy_calamity writes "The directed sound weapon made by US company ATC is being exported to the Chinese police, despite the public law banning sales of weapons to China. Turns out that such 'non-lethal' technologies are not covered by this law — an omission that may become more widely known if they are used to quell high-profile protests during the Olympics."
Is it really a weapon? (Score:3, Interesting)
Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
AFAIK, the principles behind the technology aren't all that complicated.
Re:Is it really a weapon? (Score:4, Interesting)
Not to start a slashwar, but our government has redefined many standard terms in the past 8 years, so a weapon may be classified as anything more destructive than the Death Star. Everything else is called "French Toast" and is clearly non-threatening in the greater scheme of things.
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
I would be absolutely shocked if the PRC doesn't already have existing teams whose sole function is to RE stuff.
Re:Might as well make a buck... (Score:2, Interesting)
Kate Bush knew about this years ago (Score:2, Interesting)
We were working secretly for the military
Our experiment in sound was nearly ready to begin
We only know in theory what we are doing
Music made for pleasure
Music made to thrill
It was music we were making here until
But they told us all they wanted was a sound
That could kill someone
From a distance
So we go ahead
And the meters are over in the red
It's a mistake in the making
From the painful cries of mothers to the terrifying scream
We recorded it and I put it into our machine
But they told us all they wanted was a sound
That could kill someone
It could feel like falling in love
It could feel so bad
But it could feel so good
It could sing you to sleep
But that dream is your enemy
We won't be there to be blamed
We won't be there to snitch
I just pray that someone there can hit the switch
But they told us all they wanted was a sound
That could kill someone
From a distance
And we go ahead
And the meters are over in the red
It's a mistake we have made
And the public are warned to stay off
And the public are warned to stay off
Re:Yes let's... (Score:5, Interesting)
The images of pretty affluent Chinese living in modern-looking cities we've come to enjoy in the Western media are not exactly indicative of what actually goes on over there. It's a big country with a billion people.
In any case, it's illegal to express negative feelings about the glorious Communist Party or its leaders, so I'm not sure who you've been talking to over there. Just about every Chinese I've ever met here in the US love their country, but they've rarely had anything but negative things to say about their government, regardless of the era they happened to leave.
Re:Yes let's... (Score:5, Interesting)
the vast majority of Chinese are very happy with their government at the moment
On the other hand, it was recently reported that there were over 85,000 protests in China last year, some of them violent. That is a staggering number. I suspect these sound machines will see a lot of action.
Re:Mixed feelings on this (Score:3, Interesting)
If i had the points, I would totally mod you up for your insight.
Re:Mixed feelings on this (Score:2, Interesting)
This is from my experience living in China before. After living there for over a year, I could walk around all day amongst throngs of people and have nothing affect my nerves even the slightest tinge. I think it is a related phenomenon. Not to sound too selfish -- but if nothing is bothering you, and nothing is bothering your friends and family, then nothing is wrong.
Re:Non-lethal? (Score:5, Interesting)
I had the pleasure of playing with one of these in a previous job, and the pain of having it turned up too high while I was in front of it. The LRAD is good for causing extreme discomfort, and disorienting a large crowd of people, and though it may cause permanent hearing damage if abused, I can't see it killing anyone.
Re:police = military (Score:2, Interesting)
The local cop who keeps the peace with judicious use of authority is an endangered species.
The military and law enforcement are both quickly becoming just another arm of a political machine who's purpose is to act as a PR agency for how "tough on crime" or "committed to stopping terror" politicians are. Reality has left the building.
Re:Non-lethal? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Non-lethal? (Score:1, Interesting)
Deaf, maybe. Dead? Definitely not. Not until way past 160dB. The current IASCA world record is 180.4 dBa.
Per a forum post discovery.com[1], you achieve *ONE* pound per square inch of pressure at 170dBa.
The same list[1] puts 'death from shock wave alone' at over 200dBa. I don't know what these machines are capable of, but 160dBa just gives you a headache and maybe a torn eardrum.
[1]http://community.discovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7501919888/m/9511927169
Re:Non-lethal? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:police = military (Score:1, Interesting)
Times are changing
Re:Non-lethal? (Score:2, Interesting)
Furthermore, rupturing your eardrums is not trivial. That's like saying shooting someone with a
As someone who suffers from hearing loss and tinnitus, I can tell you it is hellish. Your hearing systems in your body make up probably the most sophisticated, complex sensory system you have. We can fix eyes relatively easily; touch is a little tricky; taste and smell are tough but loss of those is truly rare. Sensorineural hearing loss, on the other hand, is far too common, untreatable, and probably will be for the foreseeable future.
Yet, here's people like you, making "harmless" sonic weapons, and this morally deficient company, selling them to a government whose M/O is repression of all dissent. You're designing/manufacturing weapons that deliver a payload that would be considered torture or cruel and unusual punishment in many circumstances. How do you figure that's justified?
I just personally don't get it. Lethal weapons I understand. Sometimes people need to be killed; I'm no pacifist. But if you're going to take violent action against someone, either make it truly recoverable or make it lethal. Don't make it something that will rob them of hearing or sight or movement or feeling for the rest of their lives. That's the worst thing you can do to a person. Ask someone who's been intentionally wounded with a gun - why couldn't a fist or a bat have done that job? Instead, the victim is given a lifetime of suffering from the wound. If you dare to pull a gun - or any weapon - on someone, as they always say, you should be shooting to kill.
Sorry for the flaming/trolling,