Google to Offer Real-Time Stock Quotes 299
Apro+im writes "Today, Google announced that Google Finance will report real-time prices on NASDAQ-listed securities. While real-time stock quotes are not new, they have long encumbered with subscriptions, legal agreements, or pay software. This may be the first free source for real-time quotes."
This is a big deal... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This is a big deal... (Score:5, Insightful)
Google vs Bloomberg (Score:5, Insightful)
I've wondered if Google might just enter the financial data market strongly. Google knows how to deal with large amount of data better than many places that are somewhat stuck in the past.
Re:I'm curious about the bandwidth (Score:4, Insightful)
We're talking about two entirely different beasts.
Re:How will Google make money? (Score:5, Insightful)
How does Google make money at anything? They'll sell your eyeballs to advertisers.
Re:ja1217 (Score:1, Insightful)
Any such process is inherently self-limiting. If you find an algorithm to make effective profit, people will take notice, and start emulating your trades. This eventually leads to a decrease in liquidity. There are always short-term models available with profit-generating potential. The problem is not finding these models, but exploiting them before market forces change the balance to obviate your model. If you are smart, and willing to make a concerted effort, you can profit this way. But far greater profits have been gained through random chance, than through any sort of trading model.
There are true patterns in the stock market. These can be exploited, and it's exciting to do so. The problem is that the patterns shift like sand in the wind. You can keep up, but it is exhausting from mental and capital standpoints. The best strategy to profit from the stock market, IMHO, is to possess a keen understanding of world affairs and economics, and to recognize global or national trends before most others. You can always get lucky and get a cookie. But perseverence and a stock of cash to weather the rough times are the true components of success.
Re:This is a big deal... (Score:3, Insightful)
I beg to differ (Score:2, Insightful)
Unless you meant that it can't be done in a way that guarantees a profit
For the most part, market makers have to be daft to not make money. And there are computerized market makers.
Re:Who needs real time stock quotes? (Score:4, Insightful)
Ironically, nobody. At least not at the personal level. Hedge funds need'em in order to buy/sell ETFs in relation to the underlying---and hopefully do it quicker than anyone else (ie: making the market `efficient'---by making a profit!)
At consumer level... if you care for ``real time quotes'', you're not investing, you're gambling.
Re:Simpsons already did it. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Maybe to some, not to me. (Score:5, Insightful)
Now -investment- is *not* a zero-sum game, over time most companies turn a profit (those who don't go bankrupt), and so buying random stock at random times and keeping it until you need the money will, on the average, give you precisely the same return as the market-average.
The Random Walk book gives good advice, except I personally prefer just naked stocks instead of index-funds. For the fairly simple reason that index-funds have -low- costs (typically 0.2%/year or thereabouts) whereas holding random stock has -zero- overhead-cost pro year.
4% pro year over 30 years give 324% (4% above inflation is a fair longterm guess for the stockmarket) 4.2% over the same period gives 344%. It's not a big deal though, either is sound advice.
index funds make sense if you ain't got enough money to invest to get an acceptable diversity yourself. Personally I change from index-funds to raw stocks when I can afford to hold 10+ different stock in a market. (which means for example for OSE, you'd need on the order of $20K)
Also in most funds, the fund-managers are technically the owners of the stock, and you own only a part of the fund. Which means, for example, that you don't get a vote on the general assembly. Instead the fund-managers get to vote -- even though it's YOUR money that bougth the stock.
Re:Simpsons already did it. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Simpsons already did it. (Score:3, Insightful)