Time Warner Cable Tries Metering Internet Use 589
As rumored a couple of months back, Time Warner is starting a trial of metered Internet access. "On Thursday, new Time Warner Cable Internet subscribers in Beaumont, Texas, will have monthly allowances for the amount of data they upload and download. Those who go over will be charged $1 per gigabyte... [T]iers will range from $29.95 a month for... 768 kilobits per second and a 5-gigabyte monthly cap to $54.90 per month for... 15 megabits per second and a 40-gigabyte cap. Those prices cover the Internet portion of subscription bundles that include video or phone services. Both downloads and uploads will count toward the monthly cap."
Re:isn't this a breach of contract? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:5, Informative)
In Australia the plans are usually for bandwidth/month, so you pay according to line speed, GB/month etc, but it's fairly uncommon (except for wireless broadband) to be charged for excess usage (they just drop the speed to something painful like 64kbps).
Many of the ISP's have unmetered content, such as local mirrors for major linux distro's, file repositories and some entertainment related stuff. So, for example, all the Ubuntu updates for our computers are not metered - in some circumstances that's VERY useful (eg: an office with 10 computers).
But Australia's internet is a horrible state of affairs generally - just putting in our experience here FWIW.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:1, Informative)
There is no bandwidth cap. They have set up their service precisely for 'heavy users' - they were one of the first ISPs to use ADSL2+ over here. Be it torrents, usenet, ftp or http, it just works - at around 2MB/sec. Even better, latency is minuscule when it comes to gaming - something else they consider important. You even get the choice of increasing your latency and dropping a little download speed in return for another megabit of upload.
Cost? £22 a month. Best ISP ever, even if they are now owned by O2. I think that works out a bit cheaper than Time Warner's offering, anyway.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:3, Informative)
Also - if you've got 10 machines running the same OS, wouldn't it be worth setting up an internal mirror / patch distribution server so you only need to pull the data down your internet pipe once?
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:2, Informative)
Caching proxy server a better solution (Score:3, Informative)
> server so you only need to pull the data down your internet pipe once?
To mirror the entire Ubuntu update repository would probably be pretty wasteful unless his office is quite extraordinary. And just mirroring the files needed by one computer will not necessarily be OK for all the other ones, unless he's very careful to install packages only on an office-wide basis. I think a better solution for him would be to use a proxy (like Squid) to cache the update files.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:2, Informative)
But honestly, who cares about that. Nowadays the support of the ISP effectively ends at the router, if they supplied it (or it's a model they support). I know AOL had stupid software you had to install etc., but that's not the case in the vast majority.
Back in the days of dial-up internet where you had to set up your modem, your winsock application, proxies, etc...etc.. they had experts who knew how to do things for a specific OS (too bad if you had mac in those days - go to a apple-specific ISP!), but now it's not really relevant.
Holding out on us (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:1, Informative)
Record profits for what, 6 years in a row or thereabouts? How do you foreigners oil price to profit ratio compare?
Re:VOD? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A little unfair hosters vs providers (Score:4, Informative)
Simple Solution (Score:1, Informative)
It blocks all ad content from being downloaded, I use it to speed up my horribly slow internet connection.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:4, Informative)
Re:This isn't cost recovery, it's profiteering. (Score:1, Informative)
Dreamhost is probably the worst company you could cite. They're notorious for promising the moon and not being able to deliver.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:2, Informative)
have you ever tried to use the internet when absolutely everyone using your isp is trying to wring that last little bit of quota out for the month? ("who cares if you get throttled 1 day from the end"). calculating billing periods based on sign-up dates spreads the load over the whole month, instead of having 2-3 days when the internet is unusable
Re:Cancel (Score:3, Informative)
Would you like to pay for a T1 connection for me? I think not.
Re:Welcome to our world (Score:2, Informative)
Geez, talk about ignorance [yahoo.com]... Those gross margins of over 40% certainly back your argument that the oil companies are hardly making any money. The fact that only 4% of the gas price goes to the gas seller speaks nothing of the profits made for digging out the crude oil and selling it for ridiculous prices. Evil or not, they are making profits at a rate that many other companies would like to... You certainly shouldn't be feeling sorry for them.
Hue and Cry (Score:2, Informative)